President Obama’s financial fix is a failure. As America’s economy continues to fail, we are told daily by President Obama as to how our recovering economy is on the right track. Our stock market and our currency rates continue to fluxuate more down than up. New unemployment rates are declining, but the total number of the unemployed continues to increase. Obama administration leaders told us as to how many jobs were being created or saved? We never got an explanation in defining ‘jobs saved’?
Is it possible that our own government agencies are manipulating, misguiding, and or falsifying Americans with erroneous history and facts? Reports are that food prices are down by .1%. This is contrary to my personal observations. Could it be a fact that unemployment numbers and rates are higher than reported? Could it be that the ‘Dow’ did fail on May 6, 2010, but a government agency poured hundreds of billions of federal dollars into the ‘Dow’ in support? If not, why has the individual making the mistake by selling with ‘Billions’ rather than ‘Millions’ of issues not been identified?
The Obama administration and majority Democrat Party leaders on Capitol Hill continues to act as the only answer to these solutions are to spend and spend. This continued excessive spending is digging credit debility for our taxpayers, their children, and more. We are spending to the end of any credibility being able to ever repay the debt. What, where, when, and how is their solution to repay?
How criminal is President Obama’s administration and his ‘Storm Troopers’, alias as some 500 SEIU members, ‘… exploded with 500 screaming, placard-waving strangers on a mission to intimidate my neighbor, Greg Baer. Baer is deputy general counsel for corporate law at Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500), a senior executive based in Washington, D.C. And that -- in the minds of the organizers at the politically influential Service Employees International Union and a Chicago outfit called National Political Action -- makes his family fair game’… ‘Waving signs denouncing bank "greed," hordes of invaders poured out of 14 school buses, up Baer's steps, and onto his front porch. As bullhorns rattled with stories of debtor calls and foreclosed homes, Baer's teenage son Jack -- alone in the house -- locked himself in the bathroom. "When are they going to leave?" Jack pleaded when I called to check on him.’ http://money.cnn.com/2010/05/19/news/companies/SEIU_Bank_of_America_protest.fortune/index.htm
Where are ABC, CBS, and NBC? Where are others of the main-stream media? Are AG Holder and President Obama supporting SEIU members to intimidate law-abiding citizens? Why has President Obama failed to criticize these actions? Is it representative of majority Democrat Party Capitol Hill members to accept these kinds of illegal activities?
Oscar Y. Harward
Thursday, May 20, 2010
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Richard Blumenthal, Resign! You Lied For Your Own Political Gain.
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Is Barack Obama a qualified American by birth President
For more than one year I have been following the issue, “Is Barack Obama a qualified American by birth President” as required by our US Constitution? For this time, many Americans have prosecuted and carried law suits into Federal Courts with Judges dismissing the suits. To me, many Judges just dismissed many of these suits as "with" or "without" merit.
This one article has a different wrinkle which should be researched, investigated, and find the truth to be found.
Is President Barack Obama an “American by birth President” or is he a fraud being supported by the majority Democrat Party on Capitol Hill?
Americans need to know. More than 600,000 Patriots have died on the battlefield in defense of our American Flag, our US Constitution, and our freedoms.
Oscar Y. Harward
oharward@carolina.rr.com
http://conservativechristianvoice.blogspot.com
BORN IN THE USA?
Investigators: Obama using Connecticut Soc. Sec. Number 3 experts insist White House answer new questions about documentation
Posted: May 11, 2010
9:57 pm Eastern
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=152773
Two private investigators working independently are asking why President Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.
In addition, the records indicate the number was issued between 1977 and 1979, yet Obama's earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at a Baskin-Robbins ice-cream shop in Oahu, Hawaii.
WND has copies of affidavits filed separately in a presidential eligibility lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia by Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels and Colorado private investigator John N. Sampson.
The investigators believe Obama needs to explain why he is using a Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants that was issued at a date later than he is known to have held employment.
See the movie Obama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential eligibility mystery!
The Social Security website confirms the first three numbers in his ID are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049.
"Since 1973, Social Security numbers have been issued by our central office," the Social Security website explains. "The first three (3) digits of a person's social security number are determined by the ZIP code of the mailing address shown on the application for a social security number."
The question is being raised amid speculation about the president's history fueled by an extraordinary lack of public documentation. Along with his original birth certificate, Obama also has not released educational records, scholarly articles, passport documents, medical records, papers from his service in the Illinois state Senate, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and adoption papers.
Robert Siciliano, president and CEO of IDTheftSecurity.com and a nationally recognized expert on identity theft, agrees the Social Security number should be questioned.
"I know Social Security numbers have been issued to people in states where they don't live, but there's usually a good reason the person applied for a Social Security number in a different state," Siciliano told WND.
WND asked Siciliano whether he thought the question was one the White House should answer.
"Yes," he replied. "In the case of President Obama, I really don't know what the good reason would be that he has a Social Security number issued in Connecticut when we know he was a resident of Hawaii."
Siciliano is a frequent expert guest on identify theft on cable television networks, including CNN, CNBC and the Fox News Channel.
Daniels and Sampson each used a different database showing Obama is using a Social Security number beginning with 042.
WND has further confirmed that the Social Security number in question links to Obama in the online records maintained by the Selective Service System. Inserting the Social Security number, his birth date and his last name produces a valid Selective Service number.
To verify the number was issued by the Social Security Administration for applicants in Connecticut, Daniels used a Social Security number verification database. She found that the numbers immediately before and immediately after Obama's were issued to Connecticut applicants between the years 1977 and 1979.
"There is obviously a case of fraud going on here," Daniels maintained. "In 15 years of having a private investigator's license in Ohio, I've never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly."
The hottest book in America is the one that exposes the real Obama and all his men (and women)! Get your autographed copy only from WND!
Does the Social Security Administration ever re-issue Social Security numbers?
"Never," Daniels said. "It's against the law for a person to have a re-issued or second Social Security number issued."
Daniels said she is "staking my reputation on a conclusion that Obama's use of this Social Security number is fraudulent."
There is no indication in the limited background documentation released by the Obama 2008 presidential campaign or by the White House to establish that Obama ever lived in Connecticut.
Nor is there any suggestion in Obama's autobiography, "Dreams from My Father," that he ever had a Connecticut address.
Also, nothing can be found in the public record that indicates Obama visited Connecticut during his high-school years.
Sampson's affidavit specifies that as a result of his formal training as an immigration officer and his 27-year career in professional law enforcement, "it is my knowledge and belief that Social Security numbers can only be applied for in the state in which the applicant habitually resides and has their official residence."
Daniels told WND she believes Obama had a different Social Security number when he worked as a teenager in Hawaii prior to 1977.
"I doubt this is President Obama's originally issued Social Security number," she told WND. "Obama has a work history in Hawaii before he left the islands to attend college at Occidental College in California, so he must have originally been issued a Social Security number in Hawaii."
The published record available about Obama indicates his first job as a teenager in Hawaii was at a Baskin-Robbins in the Makiki neighborhood on Oahu. USA Today reported the ice-cream shop still was in operation one year after Obama's inauguration.
Politifact.com, a website typically supportive of Obama, claims he worked at the Baskin-Robbins in 1975 or 1976, prior to the issuance of the number in question.
"It is a crime to use more than one Social Security number, and Barack Obama had to have a previous Social Security number to have worked at Baskin-Robbins," she insisted. "Under current law, a person is not permitted to use more than one Social Security number in a lifetime."
Another anomaly in the law enforcement databases searched by Daniels and Sampson is that the date 1890 shows up in the field indicating the birth of the number holder, along with Obama's birth date of 08/04/1961. A third date listed is 04/08/1961, which appears to be a transposition of Obama's birth date in an international format, with the day before the month.
Daniels disclosed to WND the name of the database she searched and produced a computer screen copy of the page that listed 1890 as a date associated with the 042 Social Security number.
Daniels said she can't be sure if the 1890 figure has any significance. But she said it appears the number Obama is using was previously issued by the Social Security Administration.
After an extensive check of the proprietary databases she uses as a licensed private investigator, Daniels determined that the first occurrence of Obama's association with the number was in 1986 in Chicago.
Daniels assumes, but cannot prove, that Obama took on a previously issued Social Security number that had gone dormant due to the death of the original holder.
Daniels has been a licensed private investigator in Ohio since 1995. Sampson formed his private investigations firm, CSI Consulting and Investigations, in 2008. He previously worked as a deportations law enforcement officer with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
The Daniels and Sampson affidavits were originally recorded by attorney Orly Taitz in an eligibility case against Obama last year.
This one article has a different wrinkle which should be researched, investigated, and find the truth to be found.
Is President Barack Obama an “American by birth President” or is he a fraud being supported by the majority Democrat Party on Capitol Hill?
Americans need to know. More than 600,000 Patriots have died on the battlefield in defense of our American Flag, our US Constitution, and our freedoms.
Oscar Y. Harward
oharward@carolina.rr.com
http://conservativechristianvoice.blogspot.com
BORN IN THE USA?
Investigators: Obama using Connecticut Soc. Sec. Number 3 experts insist White House answer new questions about documentation
Posted: May 11, 2010
9:57 pm Eastern
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=152773
Two private investigators working independently are asking why President Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.
In addition, the records indicate the number was issued between 1977 and 1979, yet Obama's earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at a Baskin-Robbins ice-cream shop in Oahu, Hawaii.
WND has copies of affidavits filed separately in a presidential eligibility lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia by Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels and Colorado private investigator John N. Sampson.
The investigators believe Obama needs to explain why he is using a Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants that was issued at a date later than he is known to have held employment.
See the movie Obama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential eligibility mystery!
The Social Security website confirms the first three numbers in his ID are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049.
"Since 1973, Social Security numbers have been issued by our central office," the Social Security website explains. "The first three (3) digits of a person's social security number are determined by the ZIP code of the mailing address shown on the application for a social security number."
The question is being raised amid speculation about the president's history fueled by an extraordinary lack of public documentation. Along with his original birth certificate, Obama also has not released educational records, scholarly articles, passport documents, medical records, papers from his service in the Illinois state Senate, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and adoption papers.
Robert Siciliano, president and CEO of IDTheftSecurity.com and a nationally recognized expert on identity theft, agrees the Social Security number should be questioned.
"I know Social Security numbers have been issued to people in states where they don't live, but there's usually a good reason the person applied for a Social Security number in a different state," Siciliano told WND.
WND asked Siciliano whether he thought the question was one the White House should answer.
"Yes," he replied. "In the case of President Obama, I really don't know what the good reason would be that he has a Social Security number issued in Connecticut when we know he was a resident of Hawaii."
Siciliano is a frequent expert guest on identify theft on cable television networks, including CNN, CNBC and the Fox News Channel.
Daniels and Sampson each used a different database showing Obama is using a Social Security number beginning with 042.
WND has further confirmed that the Social Security number in question links to Obama in the online records maintained by the Selective Service System. Inserting the Social Security number, his birth date and his last name produces a valid Selective Service number.
To verify the number was issued by the Social Security Administration for applicants in Connecticut, Daniels used a Social Security number verification database. She found that the numbers immediately before and immediately after Obama's were issued to Connecticut applicants between the years 1977 and 1979.
"There is obviously a case of fraud going on here," Daniels maintained. "In 15 years of having a private investigator's license in Ohio, I've never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly."
The hottest book in America is the one that exposes the real Obama and all his men (and women)! Get your autographed copy only from WND!
Does the Social Security Administration ever re-issue Social Security numbers?
"Never," Daniels said. "It's against the law for a person to have a re-issued or second Social Security number issued."
Daniels said she is "staking my reputation on a conclusion that Obama's use of this Social Security number is fraudulent."
There is no indication in the limited background documentation released by the Obama 2008 presidential campaign or by the White House to establish that Obama ever lived in Connecticut.
Nor is there any suggestion in Obama's autobiography, "Dreams from My Father," that he ever had a Connecticut address.
Also, nothing can be found in the public record that indicates Obama visited Connecticut during his high-school years.
Sampson's affidavit specifies that as a result of his formal training as an immigration officer and his 27-year career in professional law enforcement, "it is my knowledge and belief that Social Security numbers can only be applied for in the state in which the applicant habitually resides and has their official residence."
Daniels told WND she believes Obama had a different Social Security number when he worked as a teenager in Hawaii prior to 1977.
"I doubt this is President Obama's originally issued Social Security number," she told WND. "Obama has a work history in Hawaii before he left the islands to attend college at Occidental College in California, so he must have originally been issued a Social Security number in Hawaii."
The published record available about Obama indicates his first job as a teenager in Hawaii was at a Baskin-Robbins in the Makiki neighborhood on Oahu. USA Today reported the ice-cream shop still was in operation one year after Obama's inauguration.
Politifact.com, a website typically supportive of Obama, claims he worked at the Baskin-Robbins in 1975 or 1976, prior to the issuance of the number in question.
"It is a crime to use more than one Social Security number, and Barack Obama had to have a previous Social Security number to have worked at Baskin-Robbins," she insisted. "Under current law, a person is not permitted to use more than one Social Security number in a lifetime."
Another anomaly in the law enforcement databases searched by Daniels and Sampson is that the date 1890 shows up in the field indicating the birth of the number holder, along with Obama's birth date of 08/04/1961. A third date listed is 04/08/1961, which appears to be a transposition of Obama's birth date in an international format, with the day before the month.
Daniels disclosed to WND the name of the database she searched and produced a computer screen copy of the page that listed 1890 as a date associated with the 042 Social Security number.
Daniels said she can't be sure if the 1890 figure has any significance. But she said it appears the number Obama is using was previously issued by the Social Security Administration.
After an extensive check of the proprietary databases she uses as a licensed private investigator, Daniels determined that the first occurrence of Obama's association with the number was in 1986 in Chicago.
Daniels assumes, but cannot prove, that Obama took on a previously issued Social Security number that had gone dormant due to the death of the original holder.
Daniels has been a licensed private investigator in Ohio since 1995. Sampson formed his private investigations firm, CSI Consulting and Investigations, in 2008. He previously worked as a deportations law enforcement officer with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
The Daniels and Sampson affidavits were originally recorded by attorney Orly Taitz in an eligibility case against Obama last year.
Monday, May 10, 2010
National Security Policies – Democrat Party v. Republican Party
Let us examine a difference between elected Democrat Party leaders and elected Republican Party leaders on ‘National Security’.
President Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, and a majority of elected Capitol Hill Democrat Party leaders allowed and/or supported the prosecution of Navy SEALS in Military Courts.
These same elected Democrat Party leaders reject captured terrorists to remain at GITMO. This majority elected Democrat Party leaders support a terrorist attempting to bomb an airplane on Christmas day and/or a terrorist who attempts to leave a bombed SUV in New York’s Times Square to be tried in US Courts. These majority elected left-wing Democrat Party leaders choose to reject these radicals as captured terrorists; therefore, to be tried in Military Courts.
The majority of elected Republican Party leaders criticize President Obama and others for ‘allowing the prosecution’ of Navy SEALS in Military Courts or any other courts. These four captured insurgent radicals were terrorists who killed four Blackwater agents as they were transporting supplies for a catering company to Americans. These terrorists tied two of Americans’ hands behind their backs and threw them off a bridge. One of the captured terrorists, ‘Ahmed Hashim Abed’, was one of the US terrorists’ ‘most wanted’.
These majorities of elected Republican Party leaders want terrorists to remain at GITMO. These majorities of elected GOP leaders desire to try every terrorist attempting to bomb an airplane on Christmas day, and/or a terrorist who attempts to leave a bombed SUV in New York’s Time Square to be declared as radical wartime insurgents and be tried in Military Courts. These elected Republican Party leaders choose to ban each and every terrorist from attacking America ‘ever’ again.
This is representative of a major ‘National Security’ difference between elected Democrat Party leaders and elected Republican Party leaders.
A majority of elected Democrat Party leaders oppose trying terrorists in Military Courts, but favor trials in US Courts.
A majority of elected Republican Party leaders favor terrorists be tried in Military Courts, not in US Courts where a terrorist case may be dismissed on a simple judicial error.
Now, President Obama has appointed nominee Elena Kagan for a lifetime appointment to the SCOTUS. Obama’s nominee, Kagan has ‘NO’ experience as a Judge anywhere, not even in your local county District Court. Additionally, Elena Kagan opposes our US Military recruitment on college campus and did oppose college campus recruitment while serving at Harvard Law School Office of Career Services.
A majority of elected Republican Party leaders support US Military recruitment on college campuses and others, as our US Military protects our US Flag, our US Constitution, and our freedoms.
Oscar Y. Harward
President Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, and a majority of elected Capitol Hill Democrat Party leaders allowed and/or supported the prosecution of Navy SEALS in Military Courts.
These same elected Democrat Party leaders reject captured terrorists to remain at GITMO. This majority elected Democrat Party leaders support a terrorist attempting to bomb an airplane on Christmas day and/or a terrorist who attempts to leave a bombed SUV in New York’s Times Square to be tried in US Courts. These majority elected left-wing Democrat Party leaders choose to reject these radicals as captured terrorists; therefore, to be tried in Military Courts.
The majority of elected Republican Party leaders criticize President Obama and others for ‘allowing the prosecution’ of Navy SEALS in Military Courts or any other courts. These four captured insurgent radicals were terrorists who killed four Blackwater agents as they were transporting supplies for a catering company to Americans. These terrorists tied two of Americans’ hands behind their backs and threw them off a bridge. One of the captured terrorists, ‘Ahmed Hashim Abed’, was one of the US terrorists’ ‘most wanted’.
These majorities of elected Republican Party leaders want terrorists to remain at GITMO. These majorities of elected GOP leaders desire to try every terrorist attempting to bomb an airplane on Christmas day, and/or a terrorist who attempts to leave a bombed SUV in New York’s Time Square to be declared as radical wartime insurgents and be tried in Military Courts. These elected Republican Party leaders choose to ban each and every terrorist from attacking America ‘ever’ again.
This is representative of a major ‘National Security’ difference between elected Democrat Party leaders and elected Republican Party leaders.
A majority of elected Democrat Party leaders oppose trying terrorists in Military Courts, but favor trials in US Courts.
A majority of elected Republican Party leaders favor terrorists be tried in Military Courts, not in US Courts where a terrorist case may be dismissed on a simple judicial error.
Now, President Obama has appointed nominee Elena Kagan for a lifetime appointment to the SCOTUS. Obama’s nominee, Kagan has ‘NO’ experience as a Judge anywhere, not even in your local county District Court. Additionally, Elena Kagan opposes our US Military recruitment on college campus and did oppose college campus recruitment while serving at Harvard Law School Office of Career Services.
A majority of elected Republican Party leaders support US Military recruitment on college campuses and others, as our US Military protects our US Flag, our US Constitution, and our freedoms.
Oscar Y. Harward
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)