Obama Campaign - "If I Wanted America To Fail"

Total Pageviews

Daily Devotions


If you support our national security issues, you may love and appreciate the United States of America, our Constitution with its’ freedoms, and our American flag.

If you support and practice our fiscal issues, you may value worldly possessions.

If you support and value our social issues, you may love Judeo-Christian values.

If you support and practice all these values, that is all good; an insignia of “Wisdom” . - Oscar Y. Harward

Monday, August 30, 2010

Under Democrat Party rule, why do we vote anymore?

By: Oscar Y. Harward

A few days ago I received an E-mail from a local friend, “Tracey”, concerned as to how President Obama and his administration are ignoring our Constitution and US Code. The friend’s declaration was, “I don’t know why we vote anymore!”

My friend is concerned as the Arizona legislature enacted Senate Bill 1070 (SB1070) and Governor Brewer signed the legislation into law; only for Attorney General Eric Holder to file a lawsuit to overturn Arizona’s SB1070. Earlier, President Obama and AG Holder both admitted they had not read Arizona’s SB1070. The new law is to control and/or prohibit illegal immigration and the criminal elements within.

Arizona law, SB1070 is compliant to the US Constitution, Amendment X: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

ICE Director John Morton says he will not enforce US Immigration Code. ICE now confirms that they are dismissing current prosecutions, and will cease deportation of illegal immigrants. That decision is an “impeachable” act.

Title 8 Section 1325 of the U.S. Code:

"Improper Entry by Alien," any citizen of any country other than the United States who:

Enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers; or
Eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers; or
Attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact; has committed a federal crime.

Violations are punishable by criminal fines and imprisonment for up to six months. Repeat offenses can bring up to two years in prison. Additional civil fines may be imposed at the discretion of immigration judges, but civil fines do not negate the criminal sanctions or nature of the offense.

To my friend Tracey, “It appears we do have a President and administration that chooses to disobey and/or ignore the law. Sadly, the majority Democrats on Capitol Hill should/could address and correct this unlawful activity, but they elect not to. Voting does count! Voting does matter! President Obama and the majority of Democrats on Capitol Hill must obey the laws of our nation”.

One line within the United States Junior Chamber (Jaycee) Creed is “That government should be of laws rather than of men”. All must obey the law.

Friday, August 27, 2010

Islamic Muslim ideals attack Judeo-Christian values

By Oscar Y. Harward

America was established in our Constitution by our Founding Fathers as a Christian nation; not to be divided by any other community or group. There is so much supportive evidence to substantiate this as a fact.

Today, America is being forced to change its’ Judeo-Christian values in making room with a radical Islamic Muslim organization and its ideology. Over the past twenty to thirty years, the growth of immigration of Muslims in America has exploded.

Muslims, being committed to the Quran, follow many actions which are unacceptable in our Judeo-Christian community. Their belief is to kill any and all Christian Americans and anyone within the worldwide Jewish community. These Muslims are willing to kill members of their own family who may decide to disassociate themselves from the Islamic Muslim beliefs. Muslims’ Quran teaches Sharia Law. Muslim leaders are learning our law and forcing our citizens of the Judeo-Christian community to adjust to their lifestyle when actually our lifestyle is intensely opposed to their ethics. The Quran was inspired and written by one individual. The Bible was inspired and written by many men.

Over the past thirty eight (38) years, the Muslim community, without cause, has attacked and/or killed Americans for some fifty nine (59) times http://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/forum/topics/list-of-islamic-terror-attacks. Are Muslims practicing war between America and the Islamic Muslim community?

With these similar instances of the Muslim community, is it time for America to legislatively take a look at Muslims as a religion. Dr. Michael Kessler, who is Assistant Director of the Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs and Visiting Assistant Professor of Government at Georgetown University, said in the Washington Post, “Islam is not a religion. It is a violent political ideology of which religion is only one component and is based on its own set of laws that has no tolerance for non-Muslims."

Muslim Clerics and all other leaders in their community around the world must call upon their followers to disassociate themselves from the radical Sharia Law and other teachings within the Quran. Muslims must respect the Judeo-Christian values as founded by our early American fathers in our Constitution.

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Republican Party jobs v. Democrat Party unemployment

By Oscar Y. Harward

America’s economy is based on an open free market. Businesses create jobs. Overall, Republicans support businesses. Most businesses support the Republican Party. Republicans and most economists understand the importance of preserving existing employment and creating newer jobs.

Democrats usually support Organized Labor which has forced many of America’s businesses out of business. Labor Union demands for higher wages and benefits often exceed businesses’ ability to compete in the world market. An excellent current example is the United Auto Workers Union chose to deny its’ membership the right to vote on maintaining an Indianapolis, IN factory with an average pay rate of $15.50/hr.; thus, forcing GM to close this factory putting more than 600 jobs in jeopardy. The $15.50/hr. was a competitive rate of pay with other auto manufacturing.

No need to worry! President Obama and the majority Democrat Party on Capitol Hill will extend unemployment benefits at taxpayers’ expense, as long as it is necessary. When Unemployment Insurance is depleted, the taxpayers pick up the tab.

Democrat Party legislators, have by legislation, prevented businesses from giving money to political campaigns participating in the political process. At the same time, Labor Unions are free to spend almost unlimited funds in participating in the political process. Is that equality? Labor Unions expend almost all of their funds in support for (re)election of candidates of the Democrat Party as Democrats support Organized Labor.

President Obama, who is failing to govern the Presidency to upstart our economy, is complaining that businesses should not be allowed to participate in the election process as Organized Labor does. Again, is that fair? SCOTUS says Obama is wrong.

The economic issue of the day is jobs, jobs, and more jobs. Businesses create jobs; Labor Unions do not.

Generally speaking, when you support Democrats candidates who support Labor Unions, you may effectively be voting to export jobs or terminate jobs. Labor Unions often end up driving away jobs.

Generally speaking, when you support Republican candidates who support businesses, you may effectively be voting to create new jobs and/or expansion of more jobs in the marketplace. Businesses quite often expand more jobs.

November 2, 2010 becomes a special day on jobs and our US economy. The issue becomes: “Do you support the Republican Party and jobs, or do you support the Democrat Party and unemployment”?

Monday, August 23, 2010

President Ronald Reagan – A Personal Legacy

A reprint from July 22, 2008


A personal summary interface with a “giant of a man” in real life about a distinguished time within our US history.

I loved Ronald Reagan’s “Wisdom”. It was as if God provided him the right words, at the right time, and all the times. Yes, I did consider President Reagan a political friend. Ronald Reagan ran for President of the United States in 1976, 1980, and 1984. I like to say I worked in each of the three campaigns. North Carolina Republicans provided Ronald Reagan his very first Presidential GOP Primary victory in 1976.

Over the years, I ask Ronald Reagan:

While spending a short private meeting with Ronald Reagan in a one-on-one engagement with another personal friend, I asked Ronald Reagan to just “Keep It Simple Stupid” (KISS). He did.

To keep his promises to support Conservative “Fiscal, Social, and Moral” issues to the American people. He did.

For a special invitation for my young son, Michael and me to his January 1981 Presidential Inaugural. He did.

Upon Ronald Reagan being shot by John Hinckley on March 30, 1981, and knowing God would take care of Ronald Reagan, I, with my son, Michael, went to town for purchasing a Get-Well card and mailed it with a special note to President Reagan. Inside that note, I suggested to our President that the next time he was to be in Monroe, NC, I would propose he purchase some new life insurance from me. He did not.

To remember Bobby Allison of NASCAR in his final race of the 1982 year in California, as Bobby was on his way to winning the NASCAR Championship, so long as he finished in fifteenth (15th.) place or better in that race. I proposed he make arrangements on national TV and congratulate race car driver, Bobby Allison on his championship. After Bobby Allison won the “Daytona 500” in February 1982, the first words to come from Bobby Allison’s mouth were, “I love Ronald Reagan”. The final race of the year was rain shorted, with little TV coverage of Bobby Allison’s victory, so there was no Ronald Reagan – Bobby Allison TV interview. It was covered via radio. He tried – TV Rained out.

In the Spring of 1983, and hearing for the first time Lee Greenwood's “God Bless The USA”, I immediately contacted the White House, asking Ronald Reagan to make contact with Lee Greenwood, and invite him to the 1984 GOP National Convention. Ronald Reagan met with Lee Greenwood in Nashville, TN. Lee Greenwood did sing “God Bless The USA” at the 1984 GOP National Convention. He did.

To telephone my dad and mother on their 50th.(?) wedding anniversary to “congratulate”. He did.

To appoint now US Federal Court of Appeals Judge, David Sentelle, of Charlotte, NC to be appointed to US District Court, NC Western District. Mrs. Shirley Bossbach also submitted a letter of recommendation for this appointment. Today, Justice David Sentelle sits on the DC Court of Appeals as Presiding Judge of the Special Division for the Purpose of Appointing Independent Counsels. He did.

Thank you President Reagan for sharing just one moment in your most memorable leadership by restoring our morality, for rebuilding our national economy, for rebuilding our US Military, for tearing down the Communist “Iron Curtain”, for tearing down the physical wall which separated the City of Berlin in Germany. But most of all, thank you for representing the “dawning of America”, by instilling in each of us the ability to “believe in (y)ourself”. Ronald Reagan’s success was his continual focus on “old time Common Sense”. He learned it. He practiced it. He lived it. He legislated by it. God was his Pilot. From an “ole time plowboy” of yesterday, Ronald Reagan was a “goodun”.

God Bless Ronald Reagan and God Bless America!

Oscar Y. Harward

Sunday, August 22, 2010

Wake up America! Social Security is in trouble.

By Oscar Y. Harward

Is America Mr. Stupid? President Obama reported on August 20 that Social Security is not in trouble.

Over the last three decades, the Democrats on Capitol Hill, in their words, have been protecting Social Security. In doing so, the liberal Democrats have refused to allow conventional investments on the income of the Social Security fund as collected from American workers. Many in the GOP have proposed that a more conventional diversified investment portfolio would improve the Social Security investment returns while protecting reserves.

More and more Americans are reaching retirement age, as well as others who qualify for Social Security benefits due to death or disability. Our dwindling Social Security fund has been sending warnings to Americans for many years. Democrats continue to allow the Social Security funds to function without any corrective action for protection. Now we have reached a dangerous time where, without some immediate restorative action, we may see the Social Security fund perish.

The first question that the American taxpayers’ may ask is, “Where is the Social Security Fund Account”? The answer is that there is no separate Social Security fund. Liberal legislators on Capitol Hill have continued for years to count the Social Security fund income as just one more part of the entire budget, rather than putting the Social Security fund income into a protective “lock box”. That decision allows those on Capitol Hill to squander more otherwise, over-budget spending.

America is now in debt to the tune of $13 Trillion. This leaves every living human being, from infants to and including the elderly, in America into debt by more than $43,000 or every taxpayer in excess of $120,000. This over-spending debt is owed to Communist China, Saudi Arabia, and others.

Bernard Madoff is currently in prison for stealing Americans’ investments. Liberals on Capitol Hill should be and would be had lawmakers lacked the authority to write the legislation which allows them to misappropriate and spend by command. America must awaken as to how the Liberals on Capitol Hill are destroying (y)our wealth to an era of no return. These debts must be paid to these foreign lenders by someone, sometime.

Regardless of what President Obama says, Social Security is in financial trouble, but Social Security recipients must be protected at all cost. When will the excessive over-spending budgeting end? How can America repay this debt? What are Americans willing to give up to save our nation and pay (y)our debt?

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Facts Obama Doesn’t Want You to Connect - by Anita MonCrief


What really happened during the 2008 elections? Recent information regarding the primary caucuses paints the picture of a campaign that would stop at nothing to win. A campaign that was willing to strong arm candidates and volunteers in order to meet its goal. The documentary We Will Not Be Silenced delves into the Obama 2008 Campaign.

“We believe The Democratic National Committee (DNC) made a grave error by depriving American voters of their choice of Hillary Clinton as Democratic nominee. Senator Clinton, by all accounts, except caucuses, won the Primary Election and, therefore, should be the 2008 Democratic Nominee. That didn’t happen, due largely to illegitimate and illegal acts. We have interviews of many accounts from caucus states recounting threats, intimidation, lies, stolen documents, falsified documents, busing in voters in exchange for paying for “dinners,” etc. There are at least 2000 complaints, in Texas alone, of irregularities directed towards the Obama Campaign, that have lead to a very fractured and broken Democratic Party.”

In July, the 2007 2nd Quarter Obama Donor List was revealed and tied back to Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) and its sister organization Project Vote. On Friday, August 13th a three-judge panel of the United States Court of appeals for the Second Circuit upheld a funding ban on ACORN stemming from Congressional action:

“Congress cut off ACORN’s federal funding last year in response to allegations the group engaged in voter registration fraud and embezzlement and violated the tax-exempt status of some of its affiliates by engaging in partisan political activities.”

A clear picture of Obama and his desire to win has emerged and the public is now aware of strong arm tactics and illicit coordination with groups like ACORN. Will an imminent FEC complaint reveal that ACORN/Project Vote used tax-exemept grants and funds to run a partisan voter registration drive to get Obama elected?

Project Vote’s 2007-2008 Development Plan lays out a plan to raise over $20 million dollars through a program that including targeting maxed-out presidential donors. The plan– unaltered since June of 2007 — can be found here.


What is particularly interesting about the plan is that Sandy Newman is mentioned several times including in a the section below.

“Establish a ‘Finance Committee’ who will serve as the financial voice of PV. Put together a small group of PV core funders and/or supporters who can solicit new donors and/or connect PV staff to donors or the appropriate contacts. Points: Sandy, Zach, Jeff, Slater, and Karyn”

As a Development Associate with Project Vote, I attended meetings with Sandy Newman, Zach Polett, and Karyn Gillette at Newman’s offices in downtown Washington, DC. As a founder of the organization, Newman was extremely involved in Project Vote’s finances despite having left the leadership staff in the early nineties. Newman is mentioned on Obama’s website as a friend, and mentor. Click to enlarge.

According to Ballotpedia:

“Project Vote (or Voting for America, Inc.[1]) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit, 501(c)(3) organization. According to its website, Project Vote provides “professional training, management, evaluation and technical services on a broad continuum of key issues related to voter engagement and participation in low-income and minority communities.” It was founded in 1982 by Sandy Newman and its current executive director is Michael Slater, who has worked for Project Vote since 2004.”

The problem with lying is that it often becomes hard to keep those lies straight. Project Vote’s own website states that it has been around since 1982 and several of its grant application reference this year, but Project Vote and Obama both maintain that he worked for a different organization that was started around 1994. This organization, they claim, of course, was never affiliated with ACORN. The screen shot below was taken last year of Project Vote’s website.

Interestingly, Project Vote’s own tax returns repeat this lie as seen in the screen shot below:

Maybe Michael Slater of Project Vote can explain why their website says one thing but their tax returns say another.

Back to Sandy Newman. In 2007, Newman did reach out to potential funders and penned a memo to interested parties in the voter registration/participation community. Newman stressed the importance of the work that ACORN/Project Vote and how important the 2008 elections were.

“Together with the voters added to and remaining on the rolls because of the registration drives conducted over the last two cycles, voters galvanized by these three kinds of programs (even before counting voter turnout work) would exceed the 2004 presidential margin in nine states! They would also have an important impact (whomever they may choose to support) on other elections up and down the ballot, from US House and Senate races, Governor and Secretary of State through state legislature and races at the bottom of the ballot”

Newman also urged funders to give even if the reasons may have been to influence the outcome of the election. Newman gently suggested other ways of giving.

“They may also believe that reducing such distortions is likely to yield policies more in keeping with the interests of those whose representation in the electoral process has been inadequate. The fact that a donor may hold such a belief, or even that it may motivate giving decisions, does not cause a charitable contribution to be improper, provided that the donor intends that the actual work supported remain strictly non-partisan – that is, the work supported may not provide support or opposition to any candidate or party.”

As the chart below reveals, ACORN/Project Vote’s voter registration drive was not targeted at registering voters as it was at winning for Democrats. A number of their political plans and ACORN’s own endorsements of the likes of Obama and Donna Edwards made it clear whose side they were on.

In 2008, it was revealed that the Obama Campaign had given over $800,000 to an ACORN affiliate, Citizens Service Inc,

“The Ohio primary was March 4. According to FEC records, the Obama campaign paid Citizens Services Inc. $832,598.29, from Feb. 25 to May 17.

A Trib analysis of campaign finance reports showed Obama paid CSI for services that stood out as unusual. For example, CSI received payments of $63,000 and $75,000 for advance work. Excluding the large payments to CSI, the average amount the Obama campaign spent with other organizations was $558.82 per check on more than 1,200 entries classified as advance work.

Citizens Services Inc. is headquartered at the same address as ACORN’s national headquarters in New Orleans. Citizens Services was established in December 2004 to “assist persons and organizations who advance the interests of low- and moderate-income people,” according to paperwork filed in Louisiana. In a 2006 ACORN publication, Citizen Services Inc. is described as “ACORN’s campaign services entity.”

Project Vote’s own 2009 tax returns reveal that it gave a similar amount to CSI.

Here is the explanation:

Ballotpedia quotes from a New York Times article that references the Elizabeth Kingsley report gives insight into who Project Vote was paying at CSI.

“An example would be Zach Pollett, formerly Project Vote’s executive director and also ACORN’s political director, until July, when he relinquished the former title. Mr. Pollett continues to work as a consultant for Project Vote through another Acorn affiliate”

As evidence continues to mount against Obama and ACORN it remains to be seen how long Obama’s Teflon will last. While the public was distracted by ACORN’s antics like registering Mickey Mouse to vote, the group implemented a strategic plan in battleground states to produce the right margin of victory for Democrats. ACORN’s own 2008 Get Out the Vote plan illustrates how this was done. Click to enlarge.

ACORN’s impact in shaping American politics has become clearer since Obama took office. Considering the number of corrupt politicians holding office, that ACORN effect should not be surprising, nevertheless, the actual numbers are quite startling.

When you break those numbers down by battleground state, the true threat of ACORN and its friends becomes even clearer.

With his ineffective leadership, lies to the American people and an imploding economy, the commander-in-chief is starting to resemble yet another corrupt politician from ACORN- a usurper intent on making deals and passing agendas that push America closer to ACORN’s socialist utopia.

Cross-Posted from my new site Emerging Corruption.

Monday, August 16, 2010

TEA Party v. NUT Party

Americans may be facing some dangerous inflation along with high unemployment, and ballooned by an exploding $13 Trillion national debt. There is no optimistic remedy for American’s economy from President Obama and the liberal majority Democrat Party on Capitol Hill.

Notwithstanding, the Democrat National Committee (DNC) may have developed a strategy for winning in November. They may be developing on two (2) issues. First, they want to discredit the TEA (Taxed Enough Already) Party as ‘not credible’ on the issues. The TEA Party associates are ordinary middle class Americans who feel that they are overtaxed while watching unwanted legislation ‘crammed down our throats’.

Secondly, Democrats may be falsifying in creating ‘race’ as an issue in the election. Democrats cannot win any election without 90%-plus of the minority community. The Democrats intend to label the TEA Party associates as racists. TEA Party associates are not racists; however, if the DNC can sell ‘race’ as an issue, they hope to get out the minority votes.

If the Democrat Party can discredit the TEA Party associates ‘not credible’, and if the Democrats are able to tag the TEA Party associates ‘racists’, they may be more fallaciously triumphant in November. All elections should be based on issues, not race.

The DNC continues their efforts to discredit the TEA Party as ‘not credible’ and ‘racists’, May I recommend to the American voters that they may choose to look at the Democrat Party as the ‘Never Under Taxed’ (NUT) Party. The acronym would be most descriptive.

Oscar Y. Harward

Saturday, August 7, 2010

Do Not Build A Mosque At Ground Zero

Mayor Bloomberg, today we get a news report: “Afghanistan (AP) — Ten members of a medical team, including six Americans, were shot and killed by militants as they were returning from providing eye treatment and other health care in remote villages in northern Afghanistan, a spokesman for the team said Saturday.” Mayor Bloomberg, these killers were Islamic Muslims who hate Americans and all of the Jewish community.

Mayor Bloomberg, it was on 9/11-2001 when members of the Islamic Muslim community killed more than 3,000 Americans in your city, right here in America. Mayor Bloomberg, these killers were Islamic Muslims who hate Americans and all of the Jewish community.

On a regular basis, we hear where members of the Islamic Muslim community are killing other Americans who choose to practice Judeo-Christianity. Some victims are part of their own blood family. Mayor Bloomberg, these killers are Islamic Muslims who hate Americans and all of the Jewish community.

In many nations in the Middle East, Africa, and others, there are people who practice the Islamic Muslim thinking or lack thereof. Mayor Bloomberg, these are killers who practice the Islamic Muslim thinking who hate Americans and all of the Jewish community.

As for me, I choose to practice as Dr. Michael Kessler, who is Assistant Director of the Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs and Visiting Assistant Professor of Government at Georgetown University, said in the Washington Post, "Islam is not a religion. It is a violent political ideology of which religion is only one component and is based on its own set of laws that has no tolerance for non Muslims."

Mayor Bloomberg, if you think so much of these killers, invite each of them into your home for their practicing activity. Do not allow these known killers to build a Mosque at Ground Zero.

Protect Our Electoral College Inside Our US Constitution

This is a reprint from March 31, 2008

America, please listen carefully! Do not allow any of our elected politicians on Capitol Hill or anywhere else in America to tamper with and/or destroy our Electoral College as our process of electing our President and Vice President of our United States. Our current electoral process is sacred. Our Electoral System is not broken, or for that matter, not even stretched, except for those who may hate America and choose to break our Electoral College system and/or our Democratic Republic system of government.

There are some elected left-wing Liberals on Capitol Hill who are now starting the process to introduce and ratify legislation of eliminating the Electoral College process and of altering our election of our President and Vice President of our United States. Unfortunately, there are a few elected left-wing radicals who hate America and desire to destroy our Democratic Republic system of government. Recent reports now show three (3) Congressmen visited Iraq in October, 2002, at the request and expense of now deposed, convicted of war crimes, and executed Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. What would George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Ben Franklin, James McHenry, James Madison, or James Wilson, the Electoral College presenter, or so many others say to these current members in Congress and/or these currently proposed changes to our US Constitution and its’ potential corruptive changes? What about John Hancock, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Rush, Samuel Adams, John Adams, or any of our other authors? God Bless our forefathers’ leadership, their insights, their Wisdoms!

It is for certain our forefather authors of our US Constitution discussed the ideas of voters’ corruption and other corrupt ideas which could lead to a near never ending of counting and/or recounting votes for the President and Vice President. Over the years, we have so much history of alleged voter fraud.

Under our current Electoral College, voter fraud usually can he dealt with in a local precinct, local county, or at worst, in a single state, rather than by so many multiple precincts, counties, and/or states. Eliminating the Electoral College and changing to a total plurality vote could throw the electing of our President and Vice President into an election chaos all throughout America. The Electoral College nearly eliminates multiple corrupt precincts, counties, and/or states from perhaps, changing the final entire election results for President and Vice President of the United States after an extended term in our State and Federal Judiciary.

Our founding fathers had the wisdom to foresee the importance of an Electoral College system which may prevent corruption from destroying the entire election process in the Executive Branch as the President and Vice President of our United States.

Our forefathers set up the Electoral College system to give each state representation based for one (1) vote for each of the two (2) US Senators and one (1) vote for each of its respective members of the US House of Representatives (Congress), based on their population in their respective state.

In general, for example, if there were a 304,000,000 population within the US, and with our current fifty (50) States, each state would be allocated two (2) votes as each of our fifty (50) states have two (2) US Senators. One (1) vote for each 698,851 population persons will equally represent one (1) representative for each of our 435 members of the Congress.

With the exception of Maine and Nebraska, Electoral College votes are, by each voting state, winner take all. In Maine and Nebraska, the winning candidates as President and Vice President get the two (2) Electoral College votes as US Senators, and as each of their respective state’s total vote. Each Congressional District Electoral College vote is given to the Presidential/Vice Presidential candidate winning their respective Congressional District total votes.

Wyoming, the lowest in population (estimated at some 568,000), is the exception as each state has at least one (1) member vote in the US Congress. California is the largest in population with an estimated 36,500,000 people and which has 53 members in the US Congress.

Under a new system of electing the President and Vice President, based on a total majority votes system all over the United States, could lead to perhaps the smallest community in the US, by a very small amount of fraud, lead to corruption which may lead to counting and/or recounting votes in each and every precinct, in each and every county, and in each and every state, just to substantiate the official results.

Changes in eliminating the Electoral College for local corruption may not even change any local, district, and/or state elections; only the election for President and Vice President of the United States. The States’ and the Federal Judiciary could become overwhelmed with a newer election process. We do not need any additional legal fights throughout our entire stretched out Judicial system all over America!

The Electoral College process for electing our President and Vice President of our United States must be protected for our free Democratic Republic system of government. History proves our electoral system is unquestionably the very best.

For all who would choose to destroy our Electoral College process of electing our US President and Vice President, “JUST SAY NO”! Those who force their efforts to change our Electoral College should and must be replaced, themselves, by election.

Our Electoral College has worked exceptionally well for more than two hundred (200) years. There is no need to enter into more additional voters’ corruption. Capitol Hill representatives already have more than their own share of corruption on Capitol Hill. Changing the Electoral College is equivalent to initiating an earthquake, a hurricane, and/or a tornado combined while Americans lose their individual voting freedoms. We must save America and our Electoral College.

God Bless America!

Oscar Y. Harward

Friday, August 6, 2010

JD Hayworth v. John McCain

August 24 Primary Election is just around the corner. JD Hayworth is unquestionably the true conservative candidate for the US Senate; however, John McCain has worked more for the GOP leadership in the past year than in his entire lifetime as a Senator.

John McCain has collected some $17.8 Million in his campaign; $4.65 Million which may be dirty.

John McCain’s record authenticates that he has worked intimately with the most liberal left-wing Senator(s) Harry Reid, John Kerry, Barack Obama, the late Ted Kennedy, and others on extremely liberal legislation. John McCain refers to his activity as being a ‘maverick’. John McCain’s exertion with these liberal left-wing Democrat Senators helped defeat more conservative GOP legislation.

John McCain worked for years with these same aforementioned Senators to transform ‘illegal immigration’ and their criminal activity into ‘amnesty’. After reading the political polls, John McCain reversed his position as Arizona’s Legislature passed Immigration Law SB 1070 to control and/or stop criminal activity that was coming to and through Arizona.

JD Hayworth graduated from NC State in Raleigh, NC some three hours from my home. As a congressman, JD Hayworth earned an ‘A’ rating with the NRA and additional conservative approval ratings of 89% to 100%.

Re-electing John McCain for the US Senate as a conservative would be comparable to returning a convicted drunk to a liquor store. John McCain has rejected traditional Republicans by not supporting our GOP’s conservative legislation. JD Hayworth’s request is to become a principled conservative Senator for Arizona.

Oscar Y. Harward

Thursday, August 5, 2010

John McCain v. the GOP

By Oscar Y. Harward

John McCain and “Flimsy” Graham has members of their staffs who must have lots of time to spend their time on the telephones making arrangements for these to make appearances on TV.

Since JD Haworth became a candidate for the US Senate in a primary election against John McCain, John McCain has worked more in the past year for the GOP leadership than in his past lifetime as a US Senator.

With John McCain’s history, he has worked closely with the most liberal Senators like Harry Reid, John Kerry, Barack Obama, the late Ted Kennedy, and others on the most liberal legislation of all. While US Senate members of the Republican Party were attempting to pass conservative legislation, John McCain was working with these liberal Democrats to defeat the GOP legislation.

Just to let everyone know that John McCain (R-AZ), over the years, has been one of the worst representative GOP US Senators in the US Senate fighting the more conservative members on legislation. With John McCain (R-AZ), Susan Collins(R-ME), Olympia Snowe (R-ME) on a regualar basis along with others like “Flimsy” Graham (R-SC), it is difficult for a conservative coalition to be successful on passing conservative issues into law.

John McCain now says he is opposed to “amnesty” to “illegal immigrants” while for years he worked with Senators Reid, Kerry, Obama, and Kennedy to legalize “amnesty” to these same “illegal immigrants” which Arizonians are struggling for now. John McCain changed his position as Arizonians demanded to save themselves from the criminal activity which has been coming to and through Arizona.

To me in supporting John McCain for re-election to the US Senate would be comparable to returning a drunk back into a liquor store. John McCain has already had his opportunities to support conservative issues. In doing so, John McCain failed the test.

Monday, August 2, 2010

George Soros, Part II--The Shadow Gov't Is The Obama Gov't is the Soros Gov't.

Who is George Soros?

Written by Bruce Eden




This is a necessary read. He brought the market down in 2 days:

Here is what (CBS’) Mr. (Steve) Kroft’s research has turned up. Bit of a read, but it took 4 months to put it together.

“The main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States.” George Soros

George Soros is an evil man. He’s anti-God, anti-family, anti-American, and anti-good. He killed and robbed his own Jewish people.

If George Soros isn’t the world’s preeminent “malignant messianic narcissist,” he’ll do until Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot are reincarnated.

What we have in Soros, is a multi-billionaire atheist, with skewed moral values, and a sociopath’s lack of conscience. He considers himself to be an elitist world class philosopher, despises the American Way and just loves to do social engineering (change cultures).

György Schwartz, better known to the world as George Soros, was born August 12, 1930 in Hungary. Soros’ father, Tivadar, was a fervent practitioner of the Esperantoa language invented in 1887, and designed to be the first global language, free of any national identity.

The Schwartz’s, who were non-practicing Jews, changed the family name to Soros, in order to facilitate assimilation into the gentile population, as the Nazis spread into Hungary during the 1930s.

When Hitler’s henchman Adolf Eichmann arrived in Hungary, to oversee the murder of that country’s Jews, George Soros ended up with a man whose job was confiscating property from the Jewish population. Soros went with him on his rounds.

Soros has repeatedly called 1944 “the best year of his life.”

“70% of Mr. Soros’s fellow Jews in Hungary , nearly a half-million human beings, were annihilated in that year, yet he gives no sign that this put any damper on his elation, either at the time or indeed in retrospect.”

During an interview with “Sixty Minute’s” Steve Kroft, Soros was asked about his “best year:”

KROFT: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson.

SOROS: Yes. Yes.

KROFT: Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from your fellow Jews, friends and neighbors.

SOROS: Yes. That’s right. Yes.

KROFT: I mean, that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult?

SOROS: Not, not at all. Not at all, I rather enjoyed it.

KROFT: No feeling of guilt?

SOROS: No, only feelings of absolute power.

In his article, Muravchik describes how Soros has admitted to having “carried some rather potent messianic fantasies with me from childhood, which I felt I had to control, otherwise they might get me in trouble.”

Be that as it may. After WWII, Soros attended the London School of Economics, where he fell under the thrall of fellow atheist and Hungarian, Karl Popper, one of his professors. Popper was a mentor to Soros until Popper’s death in 1994. Two of Popper’s most influential teachings concerned “the open society,” and Fallibilism.

Fallibilism is the philosophical doctrine that all claims of knowledge could, in principle, be mistaken. (Then again, I could be wrong about that.)

The “open society” basically refers to a “test and evaluate” approach to social engineering. Regarding “open society” Roy Childs writes, “Since the Second World War, most of the Western democracies have followed Popper’s advice about piecemeal social engineering and democratic social reform, and it has gotten them into a grand mess.”

In 1956 Soros moved to New York City , where he worked on Wall Street, and started amassing his fortune. He specialized in hedge funds and currency speculation.

Soros is absolutely ruthless, amoral, and clever in his business dealings, and quickly made his fortune. By the 1980s he was well on his way to becoming the global powerhouse that he is today.

In an article Kyle-Anne Shiver wrote for “The American Thinker” she says, “Soros made his first billion in 1992 by shorting the British pound with leveraged billions in financial bets, and became known as the man who broke the Bank of England . He broke it on the backs of hard-working British citizens who immediately saw their homes severely devalued and their life savings cut drastically, almost overnight.”

In 1994 Soros crowed in “The New Republic ” that “the former Soviet Empire is now called the Soros Empire.” The Russia-gate scandal in 1999, which almost collapsed the Russian economy, was labeled by Rep. Jim Leach, then head of the House Banking Committee, to be “one of the greatest social robberies in human history.” The “Soros Empire” indeed.

In 1997 Soros almost destroyed the economies of Thailand and Malaysia . At the time, Malaysia ’s Prime Minister, Mahathir Mohamad, called Soros “a villain, and a moron.” Thai activist Weng Tojirakarn said, “We regard George Soros as a kind of Dracula. He sucks the blood from the people.”

The website Greek National Pride reports, “[Soros] was part of the full court press that dismantled Yugoslavia and caused trouble in Georgia , Ukraine and Myanmar [ Burma ]. Calling himself a philanthropist, Soros’ role is to tighten the ideological stranglehold of globalization and the New World Order while promoting his own financial gain. He is without conscience; a capitalist who functions with absolute amorality.”

France has upheld an earlier conviction against Soros, for felony insider trading. Soros was fined 2.9 million dollars.

Recently, his native Hungary fined Soros 2.2 million dollars for “illegal market manipulation.” Elizabeth Crum writes that “The Hungarian economy has been in a state of transition as the country seeks to become more financially stable and westernized. [Soros’] deliberately driving down the share price of its largest bank put Hungary’s economy into a wicked tailspin, one from which it is still trying to recover.

My point here is that Soros is a planetary parasite. His grasp, greed, and gluttony have a global reach.

But what about America ? Soros told Australia ’s national newspaper “The Australian”: “America, as the centre of the globalised financial markets, was sucking up the savings of the world. This is now over. The game is out,” he said, adding that the time has come for “a very serious adjustment” in American’s consumption habits. He implied that he was the one with the power to bring this about.”

Soros: “World financial crisis was “stimulating” and “in a way, the culmination of my life’s work.”

Obama has recently promised 10 billion of our tax dollars to Brazil, in order to give them a leg-up in expanding their offshore oil fields. Obama’s largesse towards Brazil, came shortly after his political financial backer, George Soros, invested heavily in Brazilian oil (Petrobras).

Tait Trussel writes, “The Petrobras loan may be a windfall for Soros and Brazil, but it is a bad deal for the U.S. The American Petroleum Institute estimates that oil exploration in the U.S. could create 160,000 new, well-paying jobs, as well as $1.7 trillion in revenues to federal, state, and local governments, all while fostering greater energy security and independance.”

A blog you might want to keep an eye on is SorosWatch.com.  

Their mission: 

“This blog is dedicated to all who have suffered due to the ruthless financial pursuits of George Soros. Your stories are many and varied, but the theme is the same: the destructive power of greed without conscience. We pledge to tirelessly watch Soros wherever he goes and to print the truth in the hope that he will one day be made to stop preying upon the world’s poor, that justice will be served.”

Back to America. Soros has been actively working to destroy America from the inside out for some years now. People have been warning us. Two years ago news sources reported that “Soros [is] an extremist who wants open borders, a one-world foreign policy, legalized drugs, euthanasia, and on and on. This is off-the-chart dangerous.”

In 1997 Rachel Ehrenfeld wrote, “Soros uses his philanthropy to change or more accurately deconstruct the moral values and attitudes of the Western world, and particularly of the American people. His “open society” is not about freedom; it is about license. His vision rejects the notion of ordered liberty, in favor of a PROGRESSIVE ideology of rights and entitlements.”

Perhaps the most important of these “whistle blowers” are David Horowitz and Richard Poe. Their book “The Shadow Party” outlines in detail how Soros hijacked the Democratic Party, and now owns it lock, stock, and barrel.

Soros has been packing the Democratic Party with radicals, and ousting moderate Democrats for years.

The Shadow Party became the Shadow Government, which became the Obama Administration.

DiscoverTheNetworks.org (another good source) writes, “By his [Soros’] own admission, he helped engineer coups in Slovakia , Croatia , Georgia , and Yugoslavia . When Soros targets a country for “regime change,” he begins by creating a shadow government, a fully formed government-in-exile, ready to assume power when the opportunity arises.The Shadow Party he has built in America greatly resembles those he has created in other countries prior to instigating a coup.”

The November 2008 edition of the German magazine “Der Spiegel,” in which Soros gives his opinion on what the next POTUS (President of the U.S.) should do after taking office. “I think we need a large stimulus package.” Soros thought that around 600 billion would be about right.

Soros also said that “I think Obama presents us a great opportunity to finally deal with global warming and energy dependence. The U.S. needs a cap and trade system with auctioning of licenses for emissions rights.”

Although Soros doesn’t (yet) own the Republican Party, like he does the Democrats, make no mistake, his tentacles are spread throughout the Republican Party as well.

Soros is a partner in the Carlyle Group where he has invested more than 100 million dollars. According to an article by “The Baltimore Chronicle’s” Alice Cherbonnier, the Carlye Group is run by “a veritable who’s who of former Republican leaders,” from CIA man Frank Carlucci, to CIA head [and ex-President] George Bush, Sr.

In late 2006, Soros bought about 2 million shares of Halliburton, Dick Cheney’s old stomping grounds.

When the Democrats and Republicans held their conventions in 2000, Soros held Shadow Party conventions in the same cities, at the same time.

In 2008, Soros donated $5,000,000,000 to the Democratic National Committee, DNC, to insure Obama’s win and wins for many other Alinsky trained Radical Rules Anti-American Socialist. George has been contributing a $ billion plus to the DNC since Clinton came on the scene.

Soros has dirtied both sides of the aisle, trust me. And if that weren’t bad enough, he has long held connections with the CIA.  

And I mustn’t forget to mention Soros’ involvement with the MSM (Main Stream Media), the entertainment industry (e.g. he owns 2.6 million shares of Time Warner), and the various political advertising organizations he funnels millions to. In short, George Soros controls or influence most of the MSM. Little wonder they ignore the TEA PARTY, Soro’s NEMESIS.

As Matthew Vadum writes, “The liberal billionaire-turned-philanthropist has been buying up media properties for years in order to drive home his message to the American public that they are too materialistic, too wasteful, too selfish, and too stupid to decide for themselves how to run their own lives.”

Richard Poe writes, “Soros’ private philanthropy, totaling nearly $5 billion, continues undermining America ’s traditional Western values. His giving has provided funding of abortion rights, atheism, drug legalization, sex education, euthanasia, feminism, gun control, globalization, mass immigration, gay marriage and other radical experiments in social engineering.”

Some of the many NGOs (None Government Organizations) that Soros funds with his billions are: MoveOn.org, the Apollo Alliance , Media Matters for America , the Tides Foundation, the ACLU, ACORN, PDIA (Project on Death In America ), La Raza, and many more. For a more complete list, with brief descriptions of the NGOs, go to DiscoverTheNetworks.org.

Poe continues, “Through his global web of Open Society Institutes and Open Society Foundations, Soros has spent 25 years recruiting, training, indoctrinating and installing a network of loyal operatives in 50 countries, placing them in positions of influence and power in media, government, finance and academia.”

Without Soro’s money, would the Saul Alinsky’s Chicago machine still be rolling?

Would SEIU, ACORN, and La Raza still be pursuing their nefarious activities?

Would Big Money and lobbyists still be corrupting government?

Would our college campuses still be retirement homes for 1960s radicals?

America stands at the brink of an abyss, and that fact is directly attributable to Soros.

Soros has vigorously, cleverly, and insidiously planned the ruination of America and his puppet, Barak Obama is leading the way.

The words of Patrick Henry are apropos: “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!”

These days, Patrick Henry’s sentiment is more than just some quaint hyperbole from long ago. It’s a slow burning, but intense, glow that fires our courage and heart.

Bruce Eden

Oops! Obama mama passport 'destroyed'

State Dept. claims records gone for Stanley Ann Dunham prior to 1968

Posted: August 01, 2010
6:28 pm Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2010 WorldNetDaily


Photo from Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro's 1972 passport records
Last week, in response to a Freedom of Information Act request, the State Department released passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham, President Obama's mother – but those records for the years surrounding Obama's 1961 birth are missing.

The State Department claims that a 1980s General Services Administration directive had resulted in the destruction of many passport applications and other "non-vital" passport records, including Dunham's 1965 passport application and any other passports she may have applied for or held prior to 1965.

Destroyed, then, would also be any records shedding light on whether Dunham did or did not travel out of the country around the time of Barack Obama's birth.

The claim made in the FOIA response letter that many passport records were destroyed during the 1980s comes despite a statement on the State Department website that claims Passport Services maintains U.S. passport records for passports issued from 1925 to the present.

The records that were released, however, do contain interesting tidbits of new information about Obama's mother, including the odd listing of two different dates and locations for her marriage to Obama's Indonesian step-father, Lolo Soetoro.

In the released documents Ann Dunham listed both March 15, 1965, in Molokai, Hawaii, and alternatively, March 5, 1964, in Maui, Hawaii, as the dates and times of her marriage.

Ann Dunham later divorced Lolo Soetoro in Hawaii. The divorce decree took effect on Nov. 5, 1980, but the divorce papers do not list the date of the marriage.

No marriage certificate between Dunham and Soetoro has yet publicly surfaced, but a released application to amend Ann Dunham's 1965 passport to her married name Stanley Ann Soetoro includes a checked box indicating that a passport officer had seen the marriage certificate.

The released records also document that on Aug. 13, 1968, Ann Dunham applied to have her 1965-issued passport renewed for two years, until July 18, 1970.

Under 22 USC Sec. 217a, from 1959 through 1968, passports were initially issued for three years, but they could be renewed for an additional two years.

Obama, by any other name

Also revealed by the released records is a heretofore unknown, alternative name for Barack Obama.

In the 1968 application to renew her 1965 passport, Dunham listed as her son Barack Hussein Obama, including in parenthesis below the name, "Saebarkah," in what appears to be a variation of an Indonesian surname not previously associated in the public record with the president.
For some unexplained reason, the designation of "Barack Hussein Obama (Saebarkah)" is crossed off the 1968 application by five, handwritten, diagonal hash marks.

Ann Dunham also appears to have used two different variations of her name in obtaining and amending passports while married to Lolo Soetoro: Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro and, without her maiden name, Stanley Ann Soetoro.
On April 27, 1981, Ann Dunham applied from Jakarta, Indonesia, for a U.S. passport, indicating that she was in Indonesia working on a two-year contract from the Ford Foundation, from January 1981 through December 1982.

At that time, Ann Dunham was working on a microfinance program for the Ford Foundation, which was overseen by Peter Geithner, the father of Timothy Geithner, the current U.S. secretary of the treasury.
Ann Dunham's occupation in the 1981 passport application was listed as "Program Officer, Ford Foundation."

No passport records subsequent to 1986 for Ann Dunham were released, though presumably a passport was issued following her 1986 application, such that the 10-year period prior to expiration would have extended one year past her death.

Ann Dunham died Nov. 7, 1995, and was known to have been in Indonesia in 1994 when an Indonesian doctor first misdiagnosed as indigestion the first signs of the ovarian cancer that was the cause of her death the following year.

The released documents shed no light on proving or disproving whether Ann Dunham might have held a passport prior to Barack Obama's birth that she could have used to travel to Kenya for his birth, as has been speculated in the absence of the release of Obama's long-form birth certificate from Hawaii..

The State Department released the documents on July 29, responding to a FOIA request submitted by Christopher Strunk, a New York resident who has actively pursued obtaining documents regarding Barack Obama's birth and his eligibility to be president under the "natural born citizen" requirement of Section 1, Article Two of the United States Constitution.

The Ann Dunham passport documents released last week by the State Department in response to the Strunk FOIA request have been archived on the Internet.

The controversy continues

A prominent array of commentators, including Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, Mark Levin, Lou Dobbs, Peter Boyles and WND's Chuck Norris and Pat Boone have all said unequivocally and publicly that the Obama eligibility issue continues to be legitimate and worthy.

Longtime New York radio talker Lynn Samuels did the same. "We don't even know where he was born," she said. "I absolutely believe he was not born in this country."

WND has reported on multiple legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some of the lawsuits question whether Obama was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

Further, others question his citizenship by virtue of his attendance in Indonesian schools during his childhood and question on what passport did he travel to Pakistan three decades ago.

Adding fuel to the fire is Obama's persistent refusal to release documents that could provide answers and his appointment of lawyers to defend against all requests for his documentation.

While his supporters cite an online version of a "Certification of Live Birth" from Hawaii as his birth verification, critics point out such documents actually were issued for children not born in the state.