We must support “authentic values” with “honor” in politics as in our own life.

By Oscar Y. Harward

For the last more than 40 years, I have determined that the average voter will, in passing, listen to candidates on TV, on the radio, and/or read in the newspaper make simple “hot spot” statements that catch their ear, their heart, etc.; however, there is not enough time for voters to qualify these candidates’ statements for validation. 

True and in-depth study of candidates takes an enormous time for study.  The average voter is too busy in todays’ society for an enormous time for study and should not be forced to take todays’ necessary time to authenticate candidates’ statements.

This is “the reason” all candidates in GOP primaries should be forced to face a “Truth Group” headed by Republicans who “demands truths”.  We cannot trust the “mean-stream” Medias to report the entire truths.  GOP Presidential candidates are “saying anything they want to say” without any protests as to their “recorded history public records” which are contrary to what the candidate(s) may be saying.

The same Democrats “Truth Group” group would/should also apply.

President Obama's "Pilot Car"

If you support President Obama, follow his “Pilot Car”.

The Isaiah 9:10 Judgment - Part 1

Is “Judgment” near?   Americans have elected political leaders who have appointed others to drive God out of our daily lives; in public schools, in governments, and all around us otherwise while we sit back allowing the un-Godly to become acceptable. 

View and listen to 52:25 minutes.

 

The Isaiah 9:10 Judgment - Part 2

Is “Judgment” near?   Americans have elected political leaders who have appointed others to drive God out of our daily lives; in public schools, in governments, and all around us otherwise while we sit back allowing the un-Godly to become acceptable.

View and listen to 53:04 minutes.

ObamaCare? Can/Did it survive?

What will President Obama and Capitol Hill Democrats next "cram down our throat"?

By Lisa Benson - March 30, 2012



The Fake Trayvon Martin Flipping The Bird Pic Vs. The Real Trayvon Martin Flipping The Bird Pic

This article with pictures may put a somewhat differ image on Trayvon Martin.  “Compare” as to what the “radical” left-wing Democrats and Medias are presenting to Americans.

Perhaps, this may indicate a reference as to how his parents should be teaching their children the difference between what is right and what is wrong? 

It is amazing what parents should and could teach their children in any “House of Worship”.  You can “betcha” that this young man was not a practicing attendee in any “House of Worship”. - Oscar Y. Harward

http://rightwingnews.com/crime/the-fake-trayvon-martin-flipping-the-bird-pic-vs-the-real-trayvon-martin-flipping-the-bird-pic/

 

Written By : John Hawkins

In an extraordinary show of bias, this picture has been the face of Trayvon Martin in the media.



Trayvon looks to be, I don’t know, maybe 12 years old in this pic? Now, the MSM certainly has no obligation to use the most up to date pictures of anyone, but when you use a childhood picture of someone who is almost a man in a case like this, it presents a false image to the public. That’s very relevant given George Zimmerman’s story.

Trayvon Martin threatened and beat George Zimmerman, Zimmerman’s father said tonight in an exclusive interview on WOFL-Channel 35.
“Trayvon Martin said something to the effect of ‘you’re going to die now’ or ‘you’re going die tonight,’ ” Robert Zimmerman told WOFL’s Valerie Boey. “He continued to beat George, and at some point, George pulled his pistol and did what he did.”

Nobody would buy the idea that the kid in that picture said, “you’re going to die now” and attacked an adult. It just doesn’t seem plausible. On the other hand, would you buy that story about this kid?

He’s got the pants hanging down and the double middle fingers flipped up. He looks like a thugged out little punk — and yes, you could definitely visualize him attacking George Zimmerman. The problem is, that’s not the real Trayvon Martin.

Before we go any further, let me note that not only have I not posted that picture here before, I have written on RWN and on Twitter that isn’t the real Trayvon Martin. However, it isn’t a “phony” picture and it didn’t come from any “white supremacist” website as I’ve heard some people claim. It came from the Facebook page of Trayvon Martin (Hat tip to Dan Riehl, who was the first person I saw to find this). This Trayvon Martin is from Savannah, Georgia, not Florida. So, I think it’s fair to give people who used this photo the benefit of the doubt and assume they thought it was genuine, although it’s certainly not a legit picture.

Of course, some people have been understandably very upset about this inaccurate picture running. They’ve said it’s a smear, it was an effort to make Trayvon Martin look like a thug, etc., etc. That makes you wonder what they’re going to say about this newly found picture, which is real.


The fact that Trayvon Martin is flipping off the camera doesn’t mean George Zimmerman is innocent or that Martin deserved to get shot, but again, it undercuts the entire picture that the mainstream media has been painting. Trayvon Martin isn’t a little kid, he was far from an angel, and yes, it is entirely possible that George Zimmerman is telling the truth about what happened. Maybe Trayvon did foolishly choose to attack him and Zimmerman shot him because he had good reason to believe that his life was in danger. We simply don’t have enough information yet to know for sure who was right and who was wrong.

We do, however, have enough information to say that making this tragic and incredibly ambiguous situation into some sort of national test case for whether black Americans can get justice in the Obama era was incredibly foolish. This case is anything BUT simple or clearcut and anyone pretending that it is, is either misinformed or doesn’t care much about the truth

ObamaCare practices wealth redistribution, Socialism, and/or Communism

By Oscar Y. Harward

In most states, owners/operators of most motorized vehicles driven on our public roads and highways are required to maintain liability insurance.

The liability insurance costs are based on his/her vehicle(s), their personal lifestyle, their personal history, their driving record, and/or other histories, etc.  Each individual’s liability insurance cost is reflective to the individual and their vehicle(s), and must pay accordingly.

Not so with ObamaCare.  Under ObamaCare that President Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, and Capitol Hill Democrats “crammed down (y)our throats” in 2009-2010 in the US House http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2010/roll165.xml and in the US Senate http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00396, everyone is treated equally.  Not one member of the Republican Party on Capitol Hill voted for this Unconstitutional legislation.

If an individual becomes an “alcoholic or drunk”, a “drug addict”, a “smoker”, practices “loose sex, homosexuality, lesbian activity”, and/or other “more costly health care with hazardous lifestyle activities”, etc., and because his/her unsafe activities may create more ObamaCare health care cost, the more “good living and healthier lifestyle” individuals are “penalized” and “forced to pay”  the excessive costs for the “not so good living with more hazardous lifestyle” individuals.

Additionally, under ObamaCare, as under Socialism or Communism, there is less or no personal incentive to work harder and smarter to achieve more than those who lack the incentive to attain more in life.  All people become equal; Socialism or Communism replaces a free and open Capitalistic economy based on our Constitution and US Code.

Obama admits he is not an American.

I have not heard these distinct words from his own mouth in his own words.  Where is SCOTUS?  Obama must be removed from office!

It is not too late to nominate Newt Gingrich

By Oscar Y. Harward

Election 2012 has a comparable election of 1976. Gerald Ford, who had become appointed President via President Nixon’s White House corruption, was up for (re)election. A GOP Presidential GOP candidate named Ronald Reagan was challenging Gerald Ford’s re-election. Ronald Reagan won its first GOP Primary in North Carolina. The then-elite Republicans rejected Ronald Reagan by standing by Gerald Ford who ended up losing the General Election to Jimmy Carter.

This 2012 campaign has witnessed “Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum choosing to deliberately lie http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NawQeKsOWiE&feature=youtu.be about Newt Gingrich on many issues” when Newt’s record is clear; one example is that Newt Gingrich presented his objection to Al Gore’s version of “climate warming” in Congressional hearings http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoyPcX75RV8.

2012 GOP Presidential candidates need a “Truth-meter”. You can know the “mean-stream” Medias are noting.

This election year, the current-elite Republicans are standing by Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney does not have an outstanding history of public service and any honorable service in the private sector is questionable.

Newt Gingrich has an outstanding history of public and private service; however, Newt Gingrich has been falsely attacked by Mitt Romney and others as unrestrained. Yes, Newt Gingrich has made mistakes in his personal life, but who has not? Review and evaluate Newt Gingrich’s voting record http://www.votesmart.org/candidate/evaluations/26821/newt-gingrich.

Many Republicans are voting for a “flip-flop” nominee in Mitt Romney whom the American electorate probably will reject. Newt Gingrich is the only GOP Presidential candidate who has the knowledge, skills, experience, and yes, the determination and ability to defeat President Obama, Hillary Clinton, or any other Liberal Democrat Party nominee.

The “mean-stream” Medias will be “vetting and attacking” any GOP nominee going into the November 6, 2012 General Election. Any nominee other than current GOP Presidential candidate Newt Gingrich will likely lose.

Obama's energy solution for (y)our cars and trucks?

Obama’s energy for your cars is about as useless as getting you to work for all of his jobs. - Oscar Y. Harward

Photoshop source

Obama's economic drive!

By Gary Varvel - March 19, 2012 

President Obama’s actions are cause for Impeachment

By Oscar Y. Harward 

On June 28, 2009, Honduran President Zelaya was ousted after defying a Supreme Court order to drop plans for a referendum to ask Hondurans if they wanted to change the Constitution.  The coup had the support of the Honduran Supreme Court, Congress, and a majority of its citizens.  

President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton rejected Honduras’s Supreme Court and Congress, and a Honduran citizen majority of ousting President Zelaya by demanding the return of Zelaya as Honduran President http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/07/AR2009070702174.html.  Honduras is a free government today. 

It appears President Obama and other members of his administration may be replicating Honduran President Zelaya’s miscalculations of violating or considering the violation(s) of our Constitution and US Code. 

“Free and open elections” are one of the most “precious freedoms” for each and every citizen who is a legally qualified voter under our US Constitution. The importance is for each individual legally, qualified voter to have that person’s votes to be fully weighed. “Voter fraud” is a violation of our Constitutional freedoms. “Voter fraud” is an “obstruction to justice” as each counterfeit vote actually diminishes every legally, qualified voter’s values and rights.

On March 12, 2012, AG Eric Holder “blocked” Texas “Voter ID”.  On March 2, 2012, AG Eric Holder  prosecuted Florida’s “Voter ID”.  On December 2011, AG Eric Holder “blocked” South Carolina’s “Voter ID”; a law mirrored after Indiana’s “Voter ID”.  President Obama and his Attorney General seem to continue in efforts to authorize “Voter fraud” for their own personal and political advantages. 

The US Supreme Court has ruled on a 6 to 3 vote http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-280_162-4049369.html that “Voter ID” is permitted.  President Obama and AG Eric Holder “must” abide by SCOTUS or be “Impeached”.  Do President Obama and AG Eric Holder believe they are above US Supreme Court rulings? 

On March 9, 2012, Sec. of Defense Leon Panetta and his military advisors say US Military is under the control of UN & NATO - NOT Congress http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIrpToGU6D4. 

The US Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, says, “The Congress shall have Power… To declare War..”.  At no place does (y)our US Constitution give the UN and/or NATO any power to “supersede” Congress.  Do President Obama and AG Eric Holder believe they are above the US Constitution? 

Sec. Panetta’s conclusions came after President Obama used military force sending our US Military to Libya without any Congressional authorization.  Based on US Constitutional law, any violations by President Obama, Sec. Panetta, or any other(s) without Congressional approval must be  “Impeached”. 

On a somewhat daily basis, we see and/or hear on our TV, radio, and/or in the newspapers of additional allegations of unauthorized and/or illegal activity within this President Obama administration. 

As Honduran President Zelaya was ousted after defying their Constitution, our Constitutional freedoms must be preserved.

Obama's supply and demand

Obama's tearing-down economy.

By Lisa Benson - March 14, 2012



WHY I VOTED DEMOCRATIC

 

http://www.jeffersonreview.com/2011/04/why-i-voted-democratic/

(from a reader)

Top 12 Reasons….A List That Explains Most Everything

*When your friends cannot explain why they voted for Democrats, give them this list.  They can then pick their reasons from this “TOP12″…*

1. I voted Democrat because I believe oil companies’ profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene, but the government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15% isn’t.

2. I voted Democrat because I believe the government will do a better job of spending the money I earn than I would.

3. I voted Democrat because Freedom of Speech is fine as long as nobody is offended by it.

4. I voted Democrat because I’m way too irresponsible to own a gun, and I know that my local police are all I need to protect me from murderers and thieves.

5. I voted Democrat because I believe that people who can’t tell us if it will rain on Friday can tell us that the polar ice caps will melt away in ten years if I don’t start driving a Prius.

6. I voted Democrat because I’m not concerned about millions of babies being aborted so long as we keep all death row inmates alive.

7. I voted Democrat because I think illegal aliens have a right to free health care, education, and Social Security benefits.

8. I voted Democrat because I believe that business should not be allowed to make profits for themselves. They need to break even and give the rest away to the government for redistribution as the Democrats see fit.

9. I voted Democrat because I believe liberal judges need to rewrite the Constitution every few days to suit some fringe kooks who would never get their agendas past the voters.

10. I voted Democrat because I think that it’s better to pay billions to people who hate us for their oil, but not drill our own because it might upset some endangered beetle or gopher.

11. I voted Democrat because while we live in the greatest, most wonderful country in the world, I was promised “HOPE AND CHANGE”.

12.  I voted democrat because my hand’s in the public till, and I don’t want no tea party slammin’ the cash drawer on my dirty, sticky fingers.

Newt Gingrich & the effort to stop Sharia Law.

Stop the spread of "radical" Islamic Muslins' "Sharia Law".