(A personal commentary from a new report, copied and pasted below, from the Raleigh, NC News & Observer)
I can't prove it, but I can just "smell" it!
I do believe a "deep study" for legal verification will show many of the new voter registrations in NC will show many, yes, I said many of the new registrations are illegal immigrants, without US citizenship, which would make them illegal voter registrations.
If so, each registered voter without US citizenship are stealing the votes from each and all voter(s) who is and/or are US citizen(s).
Who can and will "check it out"? If so, who will prosecute? Time is of the essence!
Oscar Y. Harward
Published: Apr 15, 2008 12:30 AM
Modified: Apr 15, 2008 02:45 AM
More North Carolinians sign up to vote - News & Observer
Ryan Teague Beckwith, Bill Krueger and Dan Kane, Staff Writers
Since the first of the year, 144,774 new voters have signed up in North Carolina.
The 2.6 percent increase in registered voters has come as two top positions -- president and governor -- are being vacated by second-term incumbents with no obvious political heir.
The State Board of Elections calculated the new numbers over the weekend, including residents who
filed by Friday's deadline for traditional registration. Still, North Carolinians can register and vote at one-stop sites from Thursday through May 3.
Slightly more than half of the new voters are Democrats.
In all, new registered voters were: 76,131 Democrats, or 53 percent; 53,732 unaffiliated, or 37 percent; and 14,911 Republicans, or 10 percent.
That left the state with 5.75 million voters.
Wednesday, April 23, 2008
Monday, March 31, 2008
Protect Our Electoral College Inside Our US Constitution
America, please listen carefully! Do not allow any of our elected politicians on Capitol Hill or anywhere else in America to tamper with and/or destroy our Electoral College as our process of electing our President and Vice President of our United States. Our current electoral process is sacred. Our Electoral System is not broken, or for that matter, not even stretched, except for those who may hate America and choose to break our Electoral College system and/or our Democratic Republic system of government.
There are some elected left-wing Liberals on Capitol Hill who are now starting the process to introduce and ratify legislation of eliminating the Electoral College process and of altering our election of our President and Vice President of our United States. Unfortunately, there are a few elected left-wing radicals who hate America and desire to destroy our Democratic Republic system of government. Recent reports now show three (3) Congressmen visited Iraq in October, 2002, at the request and expense of now deposed, convicted of war crimes, and executed Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. What would George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Ben Franklin, James McHenry, James Madison, or James Wilson, the Electoral College presenter, or so many others say to these current members in Congress and/or these currently proposed changes to our US Constitution and its’ potential corruptive changes? What about John Hancock, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Rush, Samuel Adams, John Adams, or any of our other authors? God Bless our forefathers’ leadership, their insights, their Wisdoms!
It is for certain our forefather authors of our US Constitution discussed the ideas of voters’ corruption and other corrupt ideas which could lead to a near never ending of counting and/or recounting votes for the President and Vice President. Over the years, we have so much history of alleged voter fraud.
Under our current Electoral College, voter fraud usually can he dealt with in a local precinct, local county, or at worst, in a single state, rather than by so many multiple precincts, counties, and/or states. Eliminating the Electoral College and changing to a total plurality vote could throw the electing of our President and Vice President into an election chaos all throughout America. The Electoral College nearly eliminates multiple corrupt precincts, counties, and/or states from perhaps, changing the final entire election results for President and Vice President of the United States after an extended term in our State and Federal Judiciary.
Our founding fathers had the wisdom to foresee the importance of an Electoral College system which may prevent corruption from destroying the entire election process in the Executive Branch as the President and Vice President of our United States.
Our forefathers set up the Electoral College system to give each state representation based for one (1) vote for each of the two (2) US Senators and one (1) vote for each of its respective members of the US House of Representatives (Congress), based on their population in their respective state.
In general, for example, if there were a 304,000,000 population within the US, and with our current fifty (50) States, each state would be allocated two (2) votes as each of our fifty (50) states have two (2) US Senators. One (1) vote for each 698,851 population persons will equally represent one (1) representative for each of our 435 members of the Congress.
With the exception of Maine and Nebraska, Electoral College votes are, by each voting state, winner take all. In Maine and Nebraska, the winning candidates as President and Vice President get the two (2) Electoral College votes as US Senators, and as each of their respective state’s total vote. Each Congressional District Electoral College vote is given to the Presidential/Vice Presidential candidate winning their respective Congressional District total votes.
Wyoming, the lowest in population (estimated at some 568,000), is the exception as each state has at least one (1) member vote in the US Congress. California is the largest in population with an estimated 36,500,000 people and which has 53 members in the US Congress.
Under a new system of electing the President and Vice President, based on a total majority votes system all over the United States, could lead to perhaps the smallest community in the US, by a very small amount of fraud, lead to corruption which may lead to counting and/or recounting votes in each and every precinct, in each and every county, and in each and every state, just to substantiate the official results.
Changes in eliminating the Electoral College for local corruption may not even change any local, district, and/or state elections; only the election for President and Vice President of the United States. The States’ and the Federal Judiciary could become overwhelmed with a newer election process. We do not need any additional legal fights throughout our entire stretched out Judicial system all over America!
The Electoral College process for electing our President and Vice President of our United States must be protected for our free Democratic Republic system of government. History proves our electoral system is unquestionably the very best.
For all who would choose to destroy our Electoral College process of electing our US President and Vice President, “JUST SAY NO”! Those who force their efforts to change our Electoral College should and must be replaced, themselves, by election.
Our Electoral College has worked exceptionally well for more than two hundred (200) years. There is no need to enter into more additional voters’ corruption. Capitol Hill representatives already have more than their own share of corruption on Capitol Hill. Changing the Electoral College is equivalent to initiating an earthquake, a hurricane, and/or a tornado combined while Americans lose their individual voting freedoms. We must save America and our Electoral College.
God Bless America!
Oscar Y. Harward
There are some elected left-wing Liberals on Capitol Hill who are now starting the process to introduce and ratify legislation of eliminating the Electoral College process and of altering our election of our President and Vice President of our United States. Unfortunately, there are a few elected left-wing radicals who hate America and desire to destroy our Democratic Republic system of government. Recent reports now show three (3) Congressmen visited Iraq in October, 2002, at the request and expense of now deposed, convicted of war crimes, and executed Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. What would George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Ben Franklin, James McHenry, James Madison, or James Wilson, the Electoral College presenter, or so many others say to these current members in Congress and/or these currently proposed changes to our US Constitution and its’ potential corruptive changes? What about John Hancock, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Rush, Samuel Adams, John Adams, or any of our other authors? God Bless our forefathers’ leadership, their insights, their Wisdoms!
It is for certain our forefather authors of our US Constitution discussed the ideas of voters’ corruption and other corrupt ideas which could lead to a near never ending of counting and/or recounting votes for the President and Vice President. Over the years, we have so much history of alleged voter fraud.
Under our current Electoral College, voter fraud usually can he dealt with in a local precinct, local county, or at worst, in a single state, rather than by so many multiple precincts, counties, and/or states. Eliminating the Electoral College and changing to a total plurality vote could throw the electing of our President and Vice President into an election chaos all throughout America. The Electoral College nearly eliminates multiple corrupt precincts, counties, and/or states from perhaps, changing the final entire election results for President and Vice President of the United States after an extended term in our State and Federal Judiciary.
Our founding fathers had the wisdom to foresee the importance of an Electoral College system which may prevent corruption from destroying the entire election process in the Executive Branch as the President and Vice President of our United States.
Our forefathers set up the Electoral College system to give each state representation based for one (1) vote for each of the two (2) US Senators and one (1) vote for each of its respective members of the US House of Representatives (Congress), based on their population in their respective state.
In general, for example, if there were a 304,000,000 population within the US, and with our current fifty (50) States, each state would be allocated two (2) votes as each of our fifty (50) states have two (2) US Senators. One (1) vote for each 698,851 population persons will equally represent one (1) representative for each of our 435 members of the Congress.
With the exception of Maine and Nebraska, Electoral College votes are, by each voting state, winner take all. In Maine and Nebraska, the winning candidates as President and Vice President get the two (2) Electoral College votes as US Senators, and as each of their respective state’s total vote. Each Congressional District Electoral College vote is given to the Presidential/Vice Presidential candidate winning their respective Congressional District total votes.
Wyoming, the lowest in population (estimated at some 568,000), is the exception as each state has at least one (1) member vote in the US Congress. California is the largest in population with an estimated 36,500,000 people and which has 53 members in the US Congress.
Under a new system of electing the President and Vice President, based on a total majority votes system all over the United States, could lead to perhaps the smallest community in the US, by a very small amount of fraud, lead to corruption which may lead to counting and/or recounting votes in each and every precinct, in each and every county, and in each and every state, just to substantiate the official results.
Changes in eliminating the Electoral College for local corruption may not even change any local, district, and/or state elections; only the election for President and Vice President of the United States. The States’ and the Federal Judiciary could become overwhelmed with a newer election process. We do not need any additional legal fights throughout our entire stretched out Judicial system all over America!
The Electoral College process for electing our President and Vice President of our United States must be protected for our free Democratic Republic system of government. History proves our electoral system is unquestionably the very best.
For all who would choose to destroy our Electoral College process of electing our US President and Vice President, “JUST SAY NO”! Those who force their efforts to change our Electoral College should and must be replaced, themselves, by election.
Our Electoral College has worked exceptionally well for more than two hundred (200) years. There is no need to enter into more additional voters’ corruption. Capitol Hill representatives already have more than their own share of corruption on Capitol Hill. Changing the Electoral College is equivalent to initiating an earthquake, a hurricane, and/or a tornado combined while Americans lose their individual voting freedoms. We must save America and our Electoral College.
God Bless America!
Oscar Y. Harward
Friday, March 21, 2008
From The E-mail Bag: HAPPY EASTER–The ‘‘Finished Work of the Cross’’ is Pentecost.
From The E-mail Bag: HAPPY EASTER–The ‘‘Finished Work of the Cross’’ is Pentecost.
(This commentary was received via e-mail and is authored by Charles "Chuck" Sproull, Springville, Virginia).
What most people don't realize about the gospel of Jesus Christ, is that "the Day of Pentecost" (50 days after His death) was the direct result of His death, burial, resurrection (what we celebrate during Easter season) and ascension into heaven. Also, even though the Resurrection is considered to be the most important event in history of mankind, "the Day of Pentecost" was the most influential event; because that was proof of His resurrection and the beginning of the New Covenant, when God’s Holy Spirit and grace was made available to all mankind all over the earth through the preaching of the gospel by Jesus’ disciples.
The entire Bible and history of mankind can be summarized by Gen 1-5 and Acts 2. In Genesis 1:26-28 God created Adam “and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and he became a living body with a living soul.” In Gen 2:24 God ordained standard man/woman marriage to reproduce future generations of mankind. In Gen 3:6-7 Eve and Adam sinned and lost their spiritual relationship with God, became living bodies with dead souls. In Gen 3:15 God promised a future Savior, the “seed of the woman,” who would be victorious over the tempter. In Gen 5:3 “Adam begat sons and daughters after his image and likeness,” susceptible to sinful influences. And 4,000 years later, in Acts 2:4 and 38-42, as a result of Jesus obeying the gospel, , God breathed new life into the souls of believers, and Jesus’ followers became regenerated as living bodies with living souls. Thus, God ordained generation and regeneration to be family affairs.
About 32 years ago, I had a wonderful new birth experience (believing, confessing, repenting, being water “baptized in the name of Jesus Christ” and receiving “the gift of the Holy Spirit” – June 11,13, Oct 11,1975). This cleansed my heart of worldly lusts and overwhelmingly filled me with God's love, joy and holiness. This confirmed to me the reality of the gospel and the importance of Pentecost.
Soon afterwards, from studying the Bible, I learned that believing the gospel corresponds to “begotten again of the gospel” (1Cor 4:15, 1 Peter 1:3, Phil 1:10). Just as being begotten by a father precedes physical birth “of flesh” (John 3:6a), which actually consists of being born or water and breath and with an audible sound of breathing; likewise being “begotten again” of the gospel precedes the new birth of the “Spirit” (3:6b), which also consists of water and Holy Spirit, also with an audible sound, when God breathes new life into our souls.
Peter’s message in Acts 2:38 summarizes the procedure for believers to “obey the gospel.” Repentance = death to self will and sin. Water baptism in Jesus’ name = “buried with Him in baptism, in the likeness of His death.” (Rom 6:3-6). Receiving the Holy Ghost = resurrection into new life in Christ (Rom 6:11, 8:9-11).
All three of these correspond to being “born again of water and of the Spirit” (John 3:5, Acts 2:38). This new birth procedure is also referred to in Romans 6:3-13 and Col 2:11-13). Thus the gospel of Jesus Christ (over 2,000 years ago) can be celebrated today, every day, by experiencing the glory of Pentecost for ourselves.
While Jesus' birth, life, death and resurrection were prophesied many places in the Old Testament, "the Day of Pentecost" is when the "new covenant" and the New Testament “church” actually began. This blessed event was prophesied many places in the Old Testament (Jer 31:31-34, Joel 2:28, Isa 28:10-12, and referred back to in Acts Ch 2 and Heb. Ch 8.
Beginning on "the Day of Pentecost," people who believed the gospel began receiving what Jesus provided by the shedding of His blood, and by His resurrection and ascension. Using a technical analogy, the Gospel and Pentecost have a transmitter-receiver relationship. Two important words that link the gospel and Pentecost are “for” and “remission.” Understanding their true meanings is critical in seeing that link.
“Remission:” The most important statement regarding the purpose of Jesus death on the cross, and the least understood, is Matt 26:28, where Jesus said His blood would be "shed for many for remission of sins." Forms of the English word "remission" (occurring 12 places in the New Testament) are translated from four Greek words that mean (and are translated many other places in the New Testament) "forgiveness, blot and wash away." Remission saves us from the guilt of past sins and from fear of future judgment for those sins. On the cross, Jesus didn’t save us, but He provided us with one of many important factor of salvation, “remission of sins.”
He also promised that after He was resurrected, He would send His Holy Spirit back to His followers. He was with them, but would be in them (John 14:17,18,26; 15:26; 16:7). So, in His resurrection, He provided His Holy Spirit to all mankind.
Thus, as a result of Jesus' death, burial, resurrection, ascension into heaven and 50 days later - the pouring out of His Holy Spirit upon all flesh on the Day of Pentecost, sinners began "receiving remission of sins" by believing the gospel, repenting of their sins, and being water "baptized in the name of Jesus for the remission of sins."
Also, on "the Day of Pentecost," Jesus original followers in the upper room, eye witness believers, were “all filled with the Holy Ghost and began speaking in other tongues as the Spirit gave them utterance." And Peter preached to believers who enquired about salvation, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. For the promise is unto you and your children..." (Acts 2:4, 28-42). God ordained regeneration to be a normal family affair.
“For:” The Greek dictionary definition of the preposition "eis" includes “for,” and is most commonly used to indicate the purpose of a future action. The context meaning of "for" in Matt 26:28 is "shedding of Jesus’ blood for [the purpose of providing] remission of sins." And the context meaning of that same Greek preposition in Acts 2:38 is "water baptism in His name for [the purpose of receiving] remission of sins." [Incidentally: blood is 98% water]. There is no other way to receive remission (forgiveness of sins, washing away the guilt of past sins), because there is nothing else in the Bible whose stated purpose is “for remission;” but only the blood of Jesus, and water baptism, as Peter preached on the Day of Pentecost, the day the New Testament church began (Acts 2:47 > Matt 16:18-19).
Most theologians prefer to think that the only requirement for salvation is to believe the gospel. By skeptical reasoning they think water baptism “for remission” should actually be translated “because of remission;” therefore water baptism isn’t necessary and doesn’t actually save a person; but is only an outward sign and public confession of forgiveness, and of internal cleansing that already occurred as a result of Jesus shedding His blood. So, all we need to do is believe (accept Him and confess Him as our Savior). But there are four serious errors in this reasoning:
(1) If “for” is translated “because of” in Acts 2:38, then for the sake of consistency, that same preposition should also be translated “because of” in Matt 26:28; which would indicate Jesus shed His blood “because of remission;” or that the shedding of Jesus’ blood was an outward sign and public confession of something that had already occurred, as a result of what? Jesus believing and confessing it?
(2) Other places in the Bible, the preposition phrase “because of” is translated from a different Greek word “dia,” used to convey the reason for or result of a past condition.” It is used many other places in the New Testament, but not in these two Scriptures. There is no way to exchange one for the other in Scripture – they are not interchangeable.
(3) Theologians define water baptism as a work, and since James wrote that works don’t save us, and since [they say] we are “saved by grace alone by faith alone,” therefore the work of baptism doesn’t save us. Actually, water baptism is not work for the believer, the preacher does all the work. Also, they misquote and misunderstand the phrase “by grace are ye saved, through faith” Eph 2:8. According to the dictionary definitions and Bible context meanings of those two Greek words (charis” through “pistis”), “by grace” means “by God’s freely-given divine influence in our hearts, and it’s reflection in life,” and “through faith” means “trusting God’s word” enough to obey it, motivated by belief and hope (desire + expectation). Please study Titus 2:11-12 for the corresponding Bible context meaning of “grace,” and Heb 11:6, and Rom 1:5, 16:26, and then read Acts 19:1-8 to see how the Ephesians were born again of water and of the Spirit into the Kingdom of God and saved by God’s grace (divine influence), by through faith (responding in obedience to) the preaching of God’s word.
(4) Many think that since the thief on the cross was saved without water baptism and without the Holy Spirit, so can we. But that was at the end of the Old Testament (what Jesus “finished” on the cross), and he was never referred to anywhere in the New Testament letters.
When Peter preached the gospel to Cornelius's household, after they "received" the same gift of the Holy Ghost Peter and the others had received, he commanded them to "receive" remission of sins by believing on the name of Jesus, in water baptism (Acts 10:43-48, 11:14-17). This confirms that Jesus only provided remission on the cross.
When Paul preached to the Philippian jailor and family, he began his sermon with the title, "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved..." Then he spent the rest of the time in 16:32 (5 min - 1 hour?) explaining in more detail (implementation language) how to believe on Jesus Christ. That is motivated them to be water baptized (16:33) and rejoice (16:34). Luke didn't write all the details in Acts 16:30-34, so those Scriptures can't be used to justify not baptizing, or baptizing the wrong way for wrong reasons.
When and where did Paul "wash his sins away?" On the road to Damascus when He believed on Jesus Christ as Lord, or when he was water baptized in Damascus calling on the name of Jesus (Acts 22:16). How did the Ephesians become "holy and without blame before God in love"? By receiving the Holy Ghost and being "baptized in the name of Jesus Christ" for the remission (forgiveness) of their sins (Acts 19:1-7). What did Peter attribute his salvation and “the answer of a clean conscience” to?” Water baptism (1 Peter 3:21).
Finally, my friend, if you are still wondering if it is really necessary to “obey the gospel” and be water baptized in order to be saved, here is a question and answer for you to consider. Peter asked the question, “What shall the end be of them who obey not the gospel of God” (1 Peter 4:17). Concerning their eternal destiny, Paul answered, “In flaming fire taking vengeance on them who know not God, and obeyed not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction…” (1 Thes. 1:8,9). Pretty severe consequences, right?
When I was deeply concerned about the eternal destiny of my soul, God lead me to a place where I could hear and obey the gospel and receive the complete new birth, “of water and of the Spirit.” And it was so powerful I want others to know about it. So if I ever have a chance to wish you a “Happy Easter,” I would add, “The happiest Easter is a Pentecostal Easter.” - Chuck Sproull, Springville, IN., 3/19/2008 (1,9873 words)
Oscar Y. Harward
(This commentary was received via e-mail and is authored by Charles "Chuck" Sproull, Springville, Virginia).
What most people don't realize about the gospel of Jesus Christ, is that "the Day of Pentecost" (50 days after His death) was the direct result of His death, burial, resurrection (what we celebrate during Easter season) and ascension into heaven. Also, even though the Resurrection is considered to be the most important event in history of mankind, "the Day of Pentecost" was the most influential event; because that was proof of His resurrection and the beginning of the New Covenant, when God’s Holy Spirit and grace was made available to all mankind all over the earth through the preaching of the gospel by Jesus’ disciples.
The entire Bible and history of mankind can be summarized by Gen 1-5 and Acts 2. In Genesis 1:26-28 God created Adam “and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and he became a living body with a living soul.” In Gen 2:24 God ordained standard man/woman marriage to reproduce future generations of mankind. In Gen 3:6-7 Eve and Adam sinned and lost their spiritual relationship with God, became living bodies with dead souls. In Gen 3:15 God promised a future Savior, the “seed of the woman,” who would be victorious over the tempter. In Gen 5:3 “Adam begat sons and daughters after his image and likeness,” susceptible to sinful influences. And 4,000 years later, in Acts 2:4 and 38-42, as a result of Jesus obeying the gospel, , God breathed new life into the souls of believers, and Jesus’ followers became regenerated as living bodies with living souls. Thus, God ordained generation and regeneration to be family affairs.
About 32 years ago, I had a wonderful new birth experience (believing, confessing, repenting, being water “baptized in the name of Jesus Christ” and receiving “the gift of the Holy Spirit” – June 11,13, Oct 11,1975). This cleansed my heart of worldly lusts and overwhelmingly filled me with God's love, joy and holiness. This confirmed to me the reality of the gospel and the importance of Pentecost.
Soon afterwards, from studying the Bible, I learned that believing the gospel corresponds to “begotten again of the gospel” (1Cor 4:15, 1 Peter 1:3, Phil 1:10). Just as being begotten by a father precedes physical birth “of flesh” (John 3:6a), which actually consists of being born or water and breath and with an audible sound of breathing; likewise being “begotten again” of the gospel precedes the new birth of the “Spirit” (3:6b), which also consists of water and Holy Spirit, also with an audible sound, when God breathes new life into our souls.
Peter’s message in Acts 2:38 summarizes the procedure for believers to “obey the gospel.” Repentance = death to self will and sin. Water baptism in Jesus’ name = “buried with Him in baptism, in the likeness of His death.” (Rom 6:3-6). Receiving the Holy Ghost = resurrection into new life in Christ (Rom 6:11, 8:9-11).
All three of these correspond to being “born again of water and of the Spirit” (John 3:5, Acts 2:38). This new birth procedure is also referred to in Romans 6:3-13 and Col 2:11-13). Thus the gospel of Jesus Christ (over 2,000 years ago) can be celebrated today, every day, by experiencing the glory of Pentecost for ourselves.
While Jesus' birth, life, death and resurrection were prophesied many places in the Old Testament, "the Day of Pentecost" is when the "new covenant" and the New Testament “church” actually began. This blessed event was prophesied many places in the Old Testament (Jer 31:31-34, Joel 2:28, Isa 28:10-12, and referred back to in Acts Ch 2 and Heb. Ch 8.
Beginning on "the Day of Pentecost," people who believed the gospel began receiving what Jesus provided by the shedding of His blood, and by His resurrection and ascension. Using a technical analogy, the Gospel and Pentecost have a transmitter-receiver relationship. Two important words that link the gospel and Pentecost are “for” and “remission.” Understanding their true meanings is critical in seeing that link.
“Remission:” The most important statement regarding the purpose of Jesus death on the cross, and the least understood, is Matt 26:28, where Jesus said His blood would be "shed for many for remission of sins." Forms of the English word "remission" (occurring 12 places in the New Testament) are translated from four Greek words that mean (and are translated many other places in the New Testament) "forgiveness, blot and wash away." Remission saves us from the guilt of past sins and from fear of future judgment for those sins. On the cross, Jesus didn’t save us, but He provided us with one of many important factor of salvation, “remission of sins.”
He also promised that after He was resurrected, He would send His Holy Spirit back to His followers. He was with them, but would be in them (John 14:17,18,26; 15:26; 16:7). So, in His resurrection, He provided His Holy Spirit to all mankind.
Thus, as a result of Jesus' death, burial, resurrection, ascension into heaven and 50 days later - the pouring out of His Holy Spirit upon all flesh on the Day of Pentecost, sinners began "receiving remission of sins" by believing the gospel, repenting of their sins, and being water "baptized in the name of Jesus for the remission of sins."
Also, on "the Day of Pentecost," Jesus original followers in the upper room, eye witness believers, were “all filled with the Holy Ghost and began speaking in other tongues as the Spirit gave them utterance." And Peter preached to believers who enquired about salvation, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. For the promise is unto you and your children..." (Acts 2:4, 28-42). God ordained regeneration to be a normal family affair.
“For:” The Greek dictionary definition of the preposition "eis" includes “for,” and is most commonly used to indicate the purpose of a future action. The context meaning of "for" in Matt 26:28 is "shedding of Jesus’ blood for [the purpose of providing] remission of sins." And the context meaning of that same Greek preposition in Acts 2:38 is "water baptism in His name for [the purpose of receiving] remission of sins." [Incidentally: blood is 98% water]. There is no other way to receive remission (forgiveness of sins, washing away the guilt of past sins), because there is nothing else in the Bible whose stated purpose is “for remission;” but only the blood of Jesus, and water baptism, as Peter preached on the Day of Pentecost, the day the New Testament church began (Acts 2:47 > Matt 16:18-19).
Most theologians prefer to think that the only requirement for salvation is to believe the gospel. By skeptical reasoning they think water baptism “for remission” should actually be translated “because of remission;” therefore water baptism isn’t necessary and doesn’t actually save a person; but is only an outward sign and public confession of forgiveness, and of internal cleansing that already occurred as a result of Jesus shedding His blood. So, all we need to do is believe (accept Him and confess Him as our Savior). But there are four serious errors in this reasoning:
(1) If “for” is translated “because of” in Acts 2:38, then for the sake of consistency, that same preposition should also be translated “because of” in Matt 26:28; which would indicate Jesus shed His blood “because of remission;” or that the shedding of Jesus’ blood was an outward sign and public confession of something that had already occurred, as a result of what? Jesus believing and confessing it?
(2) Other places in the Bible, the preposition phrase “because of” is translated from a different Greek word “dia,” used to convey the reason for or result of a past condition.” It is used many other places in the New Testament, but not in these two Scriptures. There is no way to exchange one for the other in Scripture – they are not interchangeable.
(3) Theologians define water baptism as a work, and since James wrote that works don’t save us, and since [they say] we are “saved by grace alone by faith alone,” therefore the work of baptism doesn’t save us. Actually, water baptism is not work for the believer, the preacher does all the work. Also, they misquote and misunderstand the phrase “by grace are ye saved, through faith” Eph 2:8. According to the dictionary definitions and Bible context meanings of those two Greek words (charis” through “pistis”), “by grace” means “by God’s freely-given divine influence in our hearts, and it’s reflection in life,” and “through faith” means “trusting God’s word” enough to obey it, motivated by belief and hope (desire + expectation). Please study Titus 2:11-12 for the corresponding Bible context meaning of “grace,” and Heb 11:6, and Rom 1:5, 16:26, and then read Acts 19:1-8 to see how the Ephesians were born again of water and of the Spirit into the Kingdom of God and saved by God’s grace (divine influence), by through faith (responding in obedience to) the preaching of God’s word.
(4) Many think that since the thief on the cross was saved without water baptism and without the Holy Spirit, so can we. But that was at the end of the Old Testament (what Jesus “finished” on the cross), and he was never referred to anywhere in the New Testament letters.
When Peter preached the gospel to Cornelius's household, after they "received" the same gift of the Holy Ghost Peter and the others had received, he commanded them to "receive" remission of sins by believing on the name of Jesus, in water baptism (Acts 10:43-48, 11:14-17). This confirms that Jesus only provided remission on the cross.
When Paul preached to the Philippian jailor and family, he began his sermon with the title, "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved..." Then he spent the rest of the time in 16:32 (5 min - 1 hour?) explaining in more detail (implementation language) how to believe on Jesus Christ. That is motivated them to be water baptized (16:33) and rejoice (16:34). Luke didn't write all the details in Acts 16:30-34, so those Scriptures can't be used to justify not baptizing, or baptizing the wrong way for wrong reasons.
When and where did Paul "wash his sins away?" On the road to Damascus when He believed on Jesus Christ as Lord, or when he was water baptized in Damascus calling on the name of Jesus (Acts 22:16). How did the Ephesians become "holy and without blame before God in love"? By receiving the Holy Ghost and being "baptized in the name of Jesus Christ" for the remission (forgiveness) of their sins (Acts 19:1-7). What did Peter attribute his salvation and “the answer of a clean conscience” to?” Water baptism (1 Peter 3:21).
Finally, my friend, if you are still wondering if it is really necessary to “obey the gospel” and be water baptized in order to be saved, here is a question and answer for you to consider. Peter asked the question, “What shall the end be of them who obey not the gospel of God” (1 Peter 4:17). Concerning their eternal destiny, Paul answered, “In flaming fire taking vengeance on them who know not God, and obeyed not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction…” (1 Thes. 1:8,9). Pretty severe consequences, right?
When I was deeply concerned about the eternal destiny of my soul, God lead me to a place where I could hear and obey the gospel and receive the complete new birth, “of water and of the Spirit.” And it was so powerful I want others to know about it. So if I ever have a chance to wish you a “Happy Easter,” I would add, “The happiest Easter is a Pentecostal Easter.” - Chuck Sproull, Springville, IN., 3/19/2008 (1,9873 words)
Oscar Y. Harward
Friday, February 1, 2008
John McCain Is Not A Conservative
If John McCain is a Conservative, I am an astronaut, and the closest I have ever been to a space vehicle is some 300 miles up, and above our earth, as it passes over. What Sen. John McCain refers to as "comprehensive immigration reform", others refer to as "amnesty". A better description could be described is “Monopoly Immigration”. In the game of Monopoly, you pay $200.00 to get out of jail. Under John McCain’s plan, you pay $5,000.00 and you have just purchased American freedoms. Under the “illegal immigration” program which McCain is supporting, “illegal immigrants” come to America, usually with others’ stolen Social Security Number, and with that, maybe obtain another ID such as a “Drivers Operator’s License” from a state which issued “Operator’s License” to illegal immigrants, and they are on their way. The “illegal immigrants” are then able to use and abuse our hospitals, our other medical facilities, our Social Services, our public schools, etc., all at the expense of working Americans. These added costs prevent our own citizens from receiving their own adequate needs and services.
John McCain is to be commended for his service in the US Military, and especially as a “prisoner of war” in Vietnam. For God’s sake, do not allow Sen. McCain and others give away our precious freedoms so many have served for, and so many have given their lives for, especially for the criminal elements, which are now coming over the borders illegally. Americans supports legal immigration. Americans do not support illegal immigration.
Many of us have served and/or are currently serving in the US Military to protect our American Flag, our US Constitution, and the freedoms within. Over the history of our great nation’s history, over 600,000 soldiers have given their own life in the wars for these liberties. Shame on Sen. McCain and others who are willing to sell the values so many have served and died to protect.
Have you forgotten John McCain as a member of the “Gang of 14” US Senators who were to chastise President Bush for his appointments to the US Supreme Court? Have you forgotten Sen. McCain and the “Gang of 14” who were to decide on President Bush’s nominations prior to the US Senate?
Have you forgotten the McCain-Feingold legislation in the US Senate which allows the likes of billionaire George Soros who fund MoveOn.Org and recently funded an advertisement against General George Petraeus named ”General Petraeus or General Betray Us?” Have you forgotten all the funds George Soros has spent to destroy President George Bush and his administration? This legislation was co-authored by Republican Sen. John McCain and Democrat Sen. Russ Feingold. You can go to many other facts which prove Sen. John McCain is not a Conservative.
There is little difference, politically speaking, between US Presidential candidates Sen. John McCain and Sen. Hillary Clinton. The primary difference, which separates the two, is Republican Sen. McCain does support the “war on terrorism” while Democrat Sen. Clinton does not. Otherwise, you can check the record. John McCain is a Moderate to Liberal voting US Senator. Just as Democrat Sen. Joe Lieberman, both support the war on terrorism, but otherwise, are much more Liberal on almost any and all other issues.
Why did the mass TV and print media fail to, politically speaking, “bury” Sen. John McCain on the weekend news of January 26 through January 28, 2008 for “totally falsifying” Governor Mitt Romney’s remarks? The Liberal media love Sen. John McCain. To win, the “GOP can and must do much better”.
Is there any reason the likes of the New York Times and many others in the mass Liberal media support John McCain? Is there any other reason why leaders in the Democrat Party are hoping John McCain is the Republican Party nominee?
What is happening to America? What is happening to the GOP? As the Republican Party nominee, John McCain will lead the GOP to another loss in 2008.
Oscar Y. Harward
oharward@carolina.rr.com
John McCain is to be commended for his service in the US Military, and especially as a “prisoner of war” in Vietnam. For God’s sake, do not allow Sen. McCain and others give away our precious freedoms so many have served for, and so many have given their lives for, especially for the criminal elements, which are now coming over the borders illegally. Americans supports legal immigration. Americans do not support illegal immigration.
Many of us have served and/or are currently serving in the US Military to protect our American Flag, our US Constitution, and the freedoms within. Over the history of our great nation’s history, over 600,000 soldiers have given their own life in the wars for these liberties. Shame on Sen. McCain and others who are willing to sell the values so many have served and died to protect.
Have you forgotten John McCain as a member of the “Gang of 14” US Senators who were to chastise President Bush for his appointments to the US Supreme Court? Have you forgotten Sen. McCain and the “Gang of 14” who were to decide on President Bush’s nominations prior to the US Senate?
Have you forgotten the McCain-Feingold legislation in the US Senate which allows the likes of billionaire George Soros who fund MoveOn.Org and recently funded an advertisement against General George Petraeus named ”General Petraeus or General Betray Us?” Have you forgotten all the funds George Soros has spent to destroy President George Bush and his administration? This legislation was co-authored by Republican Sen. John McCain and Democrat Sen. Russ Feingold. You can go to many other facts which prove Sen. John McCain is not a Conservative.
There is little difference, politically speaking, between US Presidential candidates Sen. John McCain and Sen. Hillary Clinton. The primary difference, which separates the two, is Republican Sen. McCain does support the “war on terrorism” while Democrat Sen. Clinton does not. Otherwise, you can check the record. John McCain is a Moderate to Liberal voting US Senator. Just as Democrat Sen. Joe Lieberman, both support the war on terrorism, but otherwise, are much more Liberal on almost any and all other issues.
Why did the mass TV and print media fail to, politically speaking, “bury” Sen. John McCain on the weekend news of January 26 through January 28, 2008 for “totally falsifying” Governor Mitt Romney’s remarks? The Liberal media love Sen. John McCain. To win, the “GOP can and must do much better”.
Is there any reason the likes of the New York Times and many others in the mass Liberal media support John McCain? Is there any other reason why leaders in the Democrat Party are hoping John McCain is the Republican Party nominee?
What is happening to America? What is happening to the GOP? As the Republican Party nominee, John McCain will lead the GOP to another loss in 2008.
Oscar Y. Harward
oharward@carolina.rr.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)