Medias failing “Freedom of Speech”

By Oscar Y. Harward

As we look at each individual state, congressional district, and/or even a community, and make an effort to evaluate as to why this referenced locale votes liberal, moderate, or conservative, it is imperative that we look at the bias and/or diverse presentations to the locales by the main-stream Medias of TV, radio, and print in the same areas.

In areas where the Medias present their stories with a liberal bias in a locale, you will find the voters responding accordingly. The moderate and/or conservative Medias also have a respective voting record in their locals accordingly.

However, wherever you find an area where the voting records continue to be more liberal, you will find liberal Medias of the area who will print and accept liberal editorial views while denying the printing of conservative editorial views on the identical issues in the matching areas. The liberal left-leaning editorial articles presented will be published over the more conservative-leaning editorial articles by a ratio of five to one or more. Additionally, liberal left-leaning editorial articles will be presented with a positive accent while more conservative-leaning editorial articles will be presented with a more negative tarnish.

A diverse presentation of the news means the “main stream” media must begin in practicing “Freedom of Speech” by reporting the truth, rather than liberal bias. Sometimes, it appears many in the liberal main-stream lack the abilities to acknowledge the truth without a liberal bias. Political polls show an overwhelming majority of Americans view journalists in the Medias and their presentations as liberal and left-wing accounts. Left-wing liberal versions in the Medias have led many American voters to change their own voting decision process in their selection viewpoints.

Communications are shifting in America and around the world. An “open and free” Internet is making dramatic modifications of peoples’ views. With a few strokes on a computer keyboard, any individual may communicate their personal thoughts to thousands, and even millions, of same-thinking individuals all over the globe. Any can share the same fiscal, social, and military values to and fro. With these findings on the Internet, Americans are uncovering they are not attached to a closed liberal view of singular thoughts.

Americans are discovering they can acquire a more open examination of the news from Fox News Channel. As a result, Fox News Channel’s audience is growing rapidly with more and more viewers realizing a “fair and balanced” version of the news, as opposed to other “biased liberal views of the news” offered by CNN, MSNBC, CNBC, and even many local news stations, etc.

Neilson’s data suggests’ that 14 years old Fox News Channel may now have more audience viewers on an average time frame than CNN, MSNBC, and CNBC combined. ABC, CBS, and NBC should adjust their reporting to a more “fair and balanced” presentation. Many editors and reporters fail to acknowledge the importance of reporting “free and honest” coverage on issues are most important components of our “Freedom of Speech”.

There is a coordination in today’s world combining partisan politics to higher education. As liberals are defeated in the electoral process, the defeated liberals are appointed as professors and/or other instructors in Universities and Colleges, teaching our children the same harmful and destructive political beliefs which the voters rejected. Many liberals in the Medias fail or refuse to recognize and/or accept opposing positions, when other conservative views may carry an equal or perhaps, a more productive view. For some liberals in the Medias, it is much easier to silence and/or disassociate/discard more Conservative, Christian, and/or old English common-sense views.

For liberal editors and reporters of the Media to reject opposing conservative viewpoints, are disallowing Americans the same “Freedom of Speech” they, themselves, otherwise pledge to practice. A large majority of Americans are seeking a “fair and balanced” presentation of the news. Those in the Medias who offer this approach will grow. Others will wither on the vine. And to our friends in the liberal Medias, think as Voltiare said, “Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so, too”.

Prevent criminal activity with amnesty to illegal immigrants

By Oscar Y. Harward

Capitol Hill Democrats have not completed their agenda in the 111th. Congress. After “cramming down our throats” several radical laws in the past 2 years, American voters responded by defeating many Democrat Party members in the Congress and Senate. The Obama/Reid/Pelosi team is winding down; however, the Democrats continue to press radical left-wing legislation for the last part of November and December, 2010.

The US Senate “lame-duck” session reopens on November 29, 2010. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has scheduled a vote on S. 3827; proposed legislation which, in my opinion, is a slight disguise to grant amnesty for illegal immigrants.

Illegal immigration is a foremost issue as more criminal activity is entering the USA, specifically, crossing into America from Mexico.

You may choose to contact (y)our US Senators by telephone, send E-mails, faxes, and/or visit the Senators’ offices encouraging each how important it is to vote “NO” on S. 3827.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) has written an article concerning S.3827. These 10 items are jam-packed into short points of concern. The entire article with more comprehensive dialogue may be read at the following “link”: http://cfif.org/v/index.php/commentary/58-immigration/821-ten-things-you-need-to-know-about-s3827-the-dream-act

1. The DREAM Act Is NOT Limited to Children, and It Will Be Funded On the Backs Of Hard Working, Law-Abiding Americans

2. The DREAM Act PROVIDES SAFE HARBOR FOR ANY ALIEN, Including Criminals, From Being Removed or Deported If They Simply Submit An Application

3. Certain Criminal Aliens Will Be Eligible For Amnesty Under The DREAM Act

4. Estimates Suggest That At Least 2.1 Million Illegal Aliens Will Be Eligible For the DREAM Act Amnesty. In Reality, We Have No Idea How Many Illegal Aliens Will Apply

5. Illegal Aliens Will Get In-State Tuition Benefits

6. The DREAM Act Does Not Require That An Illegal Alien Finish Any Type of Degree (Vocational, Two-Year, or Bachelor’s Degree) As A Condition of Amnesty

7. The DREAM Act does not require that an illegal alien serve in the military as a condition for amnesty, and There is ALREADY A Legal Process In Place For Illegal Aliens to Obtain U.S. Citizenship Through Military Service

8. Despite Their Current Illegal Status, DREAM Act Aliens Will Be Given All The Rights That Legal Immigrants Receive—Including The Legal Right To Sponsor Their Parents and Extended Family Members For Immigration

9. Current Illegal Aliens Will Get Federal Student Loans, Federal Work Study Programs, and Other Forms of Federal Financial Aid

10. DHS Is Prohibited From Using the Information Provided By Illegal Aliens Whose DREAM Act Amnesty Applications Are Denied To Initiate Their Removal Proceedings or Investigate or Prosecute Fraud in the Application Process

Radical Islamic Muslims crushing American Constitutional freedoms

By Oscar Y. Harward

Ronald Reagan said, "Our natural, inalienable rights are now considered to be a dispensation from government, and freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp as it is at this moment." Ronald Reagan was exemplifying that inalienable rights are granted from God as defined in Judeo-Christian values and explicitly expressed by our founding fathers. This should not be confused by radical Islamic Muslims’ beliefs as defined in their Quran.

For histories, radical Islamic Muslims, in support of their Quran beliefs, have been at war with all Judeo-Christians around the world. The battles continue today with disputes of US Constitutional freedoms v. the Quran and Sharia Law. In expanding and intense battles, Islamic Muslims are pressing their beliefs upon America, Constitutional freedoms, and Judeo-Christian values. These transformations of radical Islamic Muslim replacement pursuits apply to many other nations of the free world.

Prior to the attack on US Marines in 1983, there was little fear of attacks on US Military armed forces’ facilities around the world. On Sunday, October 23, 1983, one homicidal Hezbollah radical Islamic Muslim, driving a truck loaded with 12,000 pounds of dynamite and drove his truck into a US Marines’ barrack in Beirut, Lebanon killing 241 Marines.

Up until 9/11/2001, Americans had little fear of getting into an airplane for business or pleasure. On September 11, radical Islamic Muslims flew 2 hijacked commercial airplanes into the New York City “twin towers” killing some 2,750 innocent Americans.

Radical Islamic Muslims flew one hijacked commercial airplane into the Pentagon killing 184 innocent Americans.

Radical Islamic Muslims flying 1 hijacked commercial airplane to an unknown destination crashed in Pennsylvania killing 40 innocent Americans. Most believe the target was the US Capitol, the White House, or perhaps, Camp David.

These illustrations are a few of many incidents with radicalism by Islamic Muslims common-day references. Radical Islamic Muslims are damaging and/or destroying America, our Constitutional freedoms, and our Judeo-Christian values.

Over the last 30 years of so, radicalism of Islamic Muslims are using our Constitution in the spread of more extremism.

The ACLU, in selling their agenda to provide individual freedoms, are continuously filing lawsuits against taxpayer-stripped federal, state, and local governments, Houses of Worship, Non-Profit organizations, etc. In many of these filed cases, the prosecuting ACLU is defeating the defendants due to their abilities to pay the legal cost in fighting the ACLU. Many of these cases are chipping away at Constitutional freedoms as intended by our founding fathers. These radical Muslims will kill any humans of Judeo-Christian values. The weapon of choice is becoming suicidal and/or homicidal bombings.

Flying in airplanes around the world has forced governments and airlines to use security in protecting public passengers and shipping of products. Full-body scanning machines and pat-down is now used as the most common used security.

Radical Islamic Muslims on September 11, 2001 did fly 2 hijacked commercial airplanes into the New York City “twin towers” killing some 2,750 innocent Americans, another into the Pentagon killing 184 innocent Americans, and a third hijacked and crashed airplane killing 40 innocent Americans. Islamic Muslims are now attempting to build an Islamic Muslim Mosque near “ground zero”. Even worse, they are seeking the taxpayers to support in funding the project.

Americans Constitutional freedoms are being crushed by radical Islamic Muslims and their criminal activity. Americans should not be penalized and/or forced to be seen by others on full-body scanning machines. American airline passengers should not be forced to tolerate full pat-down searches. American taxpayers should not be forced to pay for Radical Islamic Muslims’ criminal activity. Radical Islamic Muslim nations should be forced to pay the cost for their own peoples’ potential criminal actions by keeping Americans and the world’s other free-loving people secure.

Charlotte Airport Director Says He Wants the TSA Out

Published by Bane Windlow

http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/

CHARLOTTE, N.C. (WBTV) – The director of Charlotte Douglas International says he doesn’t think the TSA should be in charge of the airport’s security.

“I think they spend way too much money and I think it could be done a lot quicker, a lot better at a lot less expense,” said Jerry Orr.

Orr said he has always believed the airport’s police officers could do the job TSA agents do. He says he has been carefully following the backlash of the body scanners and thorough pat downs over the past several days.

To him, the complaints — especially flight attendant Cathy Bossi’s harrowing experience over being asked to removed her prosthetic breast — are nothing new. “With the amount we’ve spent with the technology that’s available that’s seems a lit overboard doesn’t it,” said Orr.

WBT

Charlotte-Douglas is now the second airport I am aware of that is considering throwing out TSA. Orlando is the other and San Francisco already uses a private contractor.

The TSA stories hitting the media are getting more and more horrific with each passing day. I think the worst one I’ve seen so far now is the experience of a Mr. Tom Sawyer, a bladder cancer survivor, who has to wear a urostomy bag. Despite his warning to the TSA security guard, who patted him down regarding his condition, the agent caused the bag to leak and Mr. Sawyer had to board the plane with his own urine splashed on him.

While the fascist director of TSA, John Pistole, insists they will not budge on the new intrusive procedures, I have a feeling his hand is going to be forced eventually. The backlash is building and I think the Congress is going to have no choice but to intervene.