Looking as to what the Capitol Hill Democrats are forcing on a few Senators who otherwise seem to have values to “life” over “abortion”, a few are making reference to “abortion” only when it makes reference to taxpayers money. First, how can anyone profess to support “civil rights” when they fail to support “life” of the unborn? “Life” should always supersede over taxpayers’ funds.
What are many elected legislators on Capitol Hill practicing? By definition by the dictionary: “whore” - To compromise one's principles for personal gain. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/whore
Another definition by Dictionary: “whore” - a venal or unscrupulous person http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/whore
By definition, “venal” - capable of being bought or obtained for money or other valuable consideration http://www.britannica.com/bps/dictionary?query=venal+ Again, by definition, “unscrupulous" - unprincipled http://www.britannica.com/bps/dictionary?query=unscrupulous
In summary, how much of taxpayers’ money will it take for a US Senator/US Representative change his/her values on “life” to vote for abortion over life? Where are the principles for life over any money? I would call on both of Louisiana’s Senators Mary Landrieu (D) and David Vitter (R) to vote “no” for ObamaCare, and all abortions over $300 Million in taxpayers’ funds for the State of Louisiana. I call upon others to vote “no” to this unprincipled legislation. “Life” is a precious value. In lieu of this proposal, the voters of Louisiana and the United States must remember on effective election days.
No comments:
Post a Comment