Spineless Court Of The United States (SCOTUS)

By Oscar Y. Harward

 

Our Constitution was originated by our Founding Fathers with three equal Branch components; Executive, Legislative, and Judiciary.

 

Each of these components have its own checks and balances; specifically, with “responsibilities” in confirming or countering the others.

 

Traditionalists have seen GW Bush’s appointment, John Roberts to SCOTUS, to contain a lack of Conservatism “judgment” since reviewing Roberts’ decisions.

 

There seems to be “adequate to overwhelming” evidence that President Obama may not be a “natural born citizen” and whereas, is not qualified to serve as President as defined by SCOTUS in MINOR v. HAPPERSETT.

 

Over the recent years, “legal professionals and scholars” have prepared cases to bring reasonable and justifiable cases before the Supreme Court seeking a hearing in proving that President Obama may not be qualified to serve as President.  All cases have been “rejected” from presentations without comments before Chief Justice John Robert’s Court.  Why?  Isn’t the responsibility for SCOTUS to monitor the two other Branches of government and apply the law as empowered under our Constitution?  I say “yes” and our SCOTUS is “failing in its Constitutional responsibilities”.

 

American History may discover that John Roberts, appointed by President GW Bush, and sworn in as Chief Justice on October 3, 2005, is not a “true” Conservative as advertised earlier.

 

John Roberts’ Court may end up serving as the Chief Justice’s most Spineless Court Of The United States (SCOTUS).  Americans are seeking Constitutional protections from without and within.