By Oscar Y. Harward
Since President Obama’s swearing in ceremony in January 2009, the Obama/Reid/Pelosi team has managed to spend more than “$3 trillion” more than America’s income. When we look at the current National Debt Clock http://www.usdebtclock.org/, we see there are some 11,412,210 “US income taxpayers”. By a simple division with arithmetic, you can calculate each US income taxpayer’s debt has increased by $26,927.03 each, in less than 2 years.
Dr. Adrian Rogers said, “Friend, you cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom. And what one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government can’t give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody. And when half of the people get the idea they don’t have to work because the other half’s going to take care of them, and when the other half get the idea it does no good to work because somebody’s going to get what I work for, that, dear friend, is about the end of any nation.”
The Obama/Reid/Pelosi team insisted that these multiple Democrat Party legislations’ expenditures were all about a recovering economy. We now have $3 trillion of US income taxpayers’ funds depleted while we have more unemployed Americans.
The fight on Capitol Hill is Democrat Party’s more spending, more government, and less Constitutional freedoms v. Republican Party’s less spending, less government, more tax relief for all, more jobs for a growing economy, and restoring Constitutional freedoms.
If you desire more government programs like ObamaCare, you may choose to vote for Democrat Party candidates.
If you desire to reverse ObamaCare, support “tort reform” in an effort to control/stop healthcare lawsuits, and you want the right to choose your own healthcare at a reasonable cost, you may choose to vote for Republican Party candidates.
If you desire more government programs like Cap and Trade legislation which will dramatically increase businesses’ cost and consumers’ cost; therefore destroying more jobs and increasing more unemployment, you may choose to vote for Democrat Party candidates.
If you desire less government programs like Cap and Trade legislation which would dramatically increase businesses’ cost and consumers’ cost; therefore destroying more jobs, but you do support less government growth, less government regulation, and you support more tax relief for all to create jobs, you may choose to vote for Republican Party candidates.
If you support more government programs like the “Banks and Wall Street Bailouts”, you may choose to vote for Democrat Party candidates. Is it strange that Democrat Party candidates on Capitol Hill are not running on the listed issues they “crammed down our throats”?
In summary, if you believe in an open and free economy allowing individuals, as well as small, middle, and large businesses, to be allowed to invest their profits into creating new jobs and expanding existing jobs; and if you believe these businesses should not receive taxpayers’ bailouts, you may choose to vote for Republican Party candidates.
For 2010 Elections, it is the economy stupid. What else is there for “left-wingers” to misunderstand?
No comments:
Post a Comment