Obama Campaign - "If I Wanted America To Fail"

Total Pageviews

Daily Devotions

WISDOM

If you support our national security issues, you may love and appreciate the United States of America, our Constitution with its’ freedoms, and our American flag.

If you support and practice our fiscal issues, you may value worldly possessions.

If you support and value our social issues, you may love Judeo-Christian values.

If you support and practice all these values, that is all good; an insignia of “Wisdom” . - Oscar Y. Harward

Sunday, October 31, 2010

Ronald Reagan’s national security v. Bill Clinton’s insecurity

During the early 1980’s, President Ronald Reagan called upon the scientific community for the development of a new anti-missile missile technology. Many Democrat leaders on Capitol Hill referred to the concept as “star wars” and criticized President Reagan on the idea. This Ronald Reagan idea turned into developed technology in 1987. President Reagan placed this development into the US Military system for security reasons. This technology stays in the US Military until Bill President Clinton was elected and took office in January 1993.

During the Presidential Bill Clinton administration, this anti-missile missile technology software was taken out of the US Military and put into the Department of Commerce. Listen America, we are making reference to President Clinton taking a new missile technology to shoot missiles and/or satellites out of the sky, and selling and/or giving this technology to Communist China. How much damage to our National Security is done by President Clinton and his administration allowing this anti-missile missile technology to be transferred to Communist China. This change was about the same time when US Secretary of Energy Bill Richardson was making visitations to China.

Upon the transfer, the anti-missile missile technology and other missile technologies were sold to Communist China. Every time you see Chinese technology shooting a missile and/or satellite out of the sky must give the Clintons’ their due appreciation; theirs not ours. http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=644

Could this be one of the main reasons the Clintons’ seem to have so many political donor friends in China?

No comments: