Obama Campaign - "If I Wanted America To Fail"

Total Pageviews

Daily Devotions

WISDOM

If you support our national security issues, you may love and appreciate the United States of America, our Constitution with its’ freedoms, and our American flag.

If you support and practice our fiscal issues, you may value worldly possessions.

If you support and value our social issues, you may love Judeo-Christian values.

If you support and practice all these values, that is all good; an insignia of “Wisdom” . - Oscar Y. Harward

Monday, June 22, 2009

ConservativeChristianRepublican-Report - 20090622

Motivational-Inspirational-Historical-Educational-Political-Enjoyable



"Daily Motivations"

The style and tone of your communications are messages in and of themselves. -- Eric Harvey



"Daily Devotions" (KJV and/or NLT)

"His brilliant splendor fills the heavens." (Habakkuk 3:3)

Have you ever considered one of the most important questions anyone could ask? Is it possible for a mere human, less than a tiny speck on a pebble of a planet in the midst of a vast galaxy, to know the great God who created everything? If so, can we know God well enough to trust, love and obey Him in whatever He asks of us? This quest is the greatest adventure in life!

We can compare our quest to know God to the story of a microscopic mite that lived on a flea on a little dog in a small yard of a humble home. This house was on the outskirts of Jerusalem in the kingdom of the rich and powerful King Solomon. The king lived in a mysterious palace in the midst of royal elegance far beyond the microscopic world of the mite. The distance to the king's palace seemed like light years.

This tiny mite decided that the most important work he could ever do was to write about that world-respected king. But, after reflecting for a long time, the frustrated mite abandoned his project. None of his words seemed adequate to describe such a majestic person.

In a very real sense, that is our predicament when we try to understand our glorious and mighty God. He lives in indescribable splendor beyond our wildest imagination. His character is far above the limited scope of our human understanding. The only difference between us and the mite is that, compared to God, we are less than a mite in this universe of more than one hundred billion galaxies.



"The Patriot Post"

"A free people [claim] their rights as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate." -- Thomas Jefferson, Rights of British America, 1774



$50 For the Homeless
I recently asked my friend's little girl what she wanted to be when she grows up. She said she wanted to be president some day.

Both of her parents, liberal Democrats, were standing there, so I asked her, "If you were president what would be the first thing you would do?"

She replied, "I'd give food and houses to all the homeless people."

Her parents beamed.

"Wow... what a worthy goal." I told her, "But you don't have to wait until you're president to do that. You can come over to my house and mow the lawn, pull weeds, and sweep my yard, and I'll pay you $50. Then I'll take you over to the grocery store where homeless guys hang out, and you can give them the $50, you earned, to use toward food and a new house."

She thought that over for a few seconds, then she looked me straight in the eye and asked, "Why doesn't the homeless guy come over and do the work, and you can just pay him the $50?"

I said, "Welcome to the Republican Party."

Her parents still aren't speaking to me.



"ACU"

HELP SEND A MESSAGE TO ABC NEWS...

I am sure you have now heard about the President's latest attempt to vastly increase the size and cost of government. Obama calls it health care reform - we know it is one giant leap toward government-run health care.

Do we want government-run health care? Do we want to wait in days-long lines for urgent care? Do we want the government telling us what treatments we can and cannot have? Do we want to enter a DMV-style government office just to take a number and sit there while we bleed we waiting for treatment?

These questions should be answered. I believe we know how most Americans would answer them.

However, ABC News is planning an all-day long bonanza of coverage on Obama's health care plan next Wednesday, June 24 in Washington and they refused to include opposition voices.

That's right; a national television news network has told Republicans and conservatives that "you are not invited." To date, they have shut us out.

We must demand fairness in media coverage of this critical issue.

Send A Message To ABC News President David Westin And ABC Television President Anne Sweeney Here And Now That Americans Demand Fairness...Conservatives Should Be Heard In The Health Care Debate! Do Not Give Obama Free Television Time To Sell Government Run Health Care.

When you sign the petition we are also going to give you the direct phone number to ABC's New York offices so you phone in your concerns, if you wish, as well.

Their planned coverage of Obama is exhaustive.

As the DAILY NEWS from New York City reported today, on Wednesday, ABC will air an interview with President Obama and the First Lady on "Good Morning America." It will also have Charles Gibson anchor "World News" from the White House and will air a prime-time, hour-long town-hall-type special with the President fielding questions on health care from Gibson, Diane Sawyer and a panel of guests.

ABC News officials have said the special will be balanced, with opinions and pointed questions from all sides on the issue.

However they have refused to allow conservative voices to be heard.

President Obama has been so gracious in opening the doors of the White House to ABC. Why? We believe because they refused to allow conservatives or Republicans on the air.

It has been reported that ABC News has out right rejected requests to allow conservatives to be part of the debate. In fact there will be no debate as he will only answer questions that have been supposedly screened only by the executives of ABC News.

In response to requests that conservatives be part of their coverage, ABC issued a letter in essence saying no and adding, "ABC NEWS alone will select those who will be in the audience asking questions of the President."

We need to demand inclusion of conservative viewpoints. This issue is too big to surrender to the far-left political forces within the White House.

Send A Message To ABC News President David Westin And ABC Television President Anne Sweeney Here And Now That Americans Demand Fairness...Conservatives Should Be Heard In The Health Care Debate! Do Not Give Obama Free Television Time To Sell Government Run Health Care.

When you sign the petition we are also going to give you the phone number to ABC's New York offices to directly voice your concerns, if you wish, as well.

Yesterday, in response to ABC's refusal to allow Obama opponents to speak, the Republican National Committee took the step of offering free television studio and satellite time to any Republican Member of Congress who wanted to send a message back home about their concerns over his plans. To their credit they are at least trying to get the word out.

So while ABC News is giving free time to Obama to promote government run health care, his opposition is required to beg local stations to give them equal time.

A democracy where the people only hear from one side is a democracy that will not survive.

This may not be Iran where radio stations and cell phone towers are being shut down to stop dissent - but it is now becoming a nation where nationwide news organizations are shutting out dissent by denying access to our airways.

We have one week to change this decision. We must speak up. We need your help.

Send A Message To ABC News President David Westin And ABC Television President Anne Sweeney Here And Now That Americans Demand Fairness...Conservatives Should Be Heard In The Health Care Debate! Do Not Give Obama Free Television Time To Sell Government Run Health Care.

When you sign the petition we are also going to give you the phone number to ABC's New York offices so you phone in your concerns, if you wish, as well.

Estimates are that Obama-Care, his health care program, will cost us taxpayers up to, if not over, $1 trillion in government funds.

Who is going to pay that $1 trillion?

The simple answer is you and me.

However, it hasn't happened yet and now is the time to make sure the American people understand the costs and the poor benefits of a government run health care system.

The American people deserve to hear all sides of the story.

Send A Message To ABC News President David Westin And ABC Television President Anne Sweeney Here And Now That Americans Demand Fairness...Conservatives Should Be Heard In The Health Care Debate! Do Not Give Obama Free Television Time To Sell Government Run Health Care.

When you sign the petition we are also going to give you the phone number to ABC's New York offices so you can call them if you wish, as well.

Please join ACU and support our efforts to ensure conservative voices are heard.

ABC News needs to get this message.

Thank you for your time and attention to this important matter.

Sincerely,

Dennis Whitfield
Executive Vice President

P.S. ABC News doesn't seem to realize that almost half, 46%, of Americans voted against Barack Obama last November. Many more according to polls no longer support all of the massive government expansion and spending that has followed.

Send A Message To ABC News President David Westin And ABC Television President Anne Sweeney Here And Now That Americans Demand Fairness...Conservatives Should Be Heard In The Health Care Debate! Do Not Give Obama Free Television Time To Sell Government Run Health Care.



"The Web"

Is Anyone Minding the Store at the Federal Reserve?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJqM2tFOxLQ&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fslopeofhope



A Muslim Journey To Hope

A 20 minute "must hear" message of conversion from Muslim to Christianity. - oyh

http://www.muslimjourneytohope.com/testimonies/testimony_afshin.wmv



Sarah Palin, the 21st Century 'It' Girl

By Jay Valentine

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/06/sarah_palin_the_21st_century_i.html

The best and the brightest on the left go into politics. The best on the right run their own businesses. So it is no surprise that the left is far more adept, even expert at the art of hardball politics. And they are telling us something profound.

The left is telling us something many feel, many find as a hunch, that Sarah Palin is the most dangerous threat to the Obama administration with no close second. The left is telling us this by their "over the top" attacks. Not just the Letterman assaults, but the constant barrage of grievances filed against her in Alaska. The attacks every day on Palin for no apparent reason -- except that the left seems to see her quite differently from any Republican candidate. A difference of kind, not of degree.

They would never do this to Romney, Huckabee or Newt, at least not to this level. There is a clear reason -- these guys couldn't fill up a high school stadium unless they were giving out free beer.

What is the Sarah difference? Well, it's not the issues, at least that is not all of it. It is the charisma factor. Charisma is not learned, it is innate. One is born with it and no amount of training can inject it. Jack Kennedy had it. So did Reagan. Now Obama. Out of the thousands of politicians who have come and gone over the last generation, not one other person has shown "it."

Money is no longer the life blood of politics. Charisma is. Charisma can raise money overnight; money far beyond what a tired, inarticulate incumbent can raise from rich donors.

When you have "it," the conventional rules no longer apply. Reagan was vilified in 1976 and few thought he could ever be president. No matter how the liberals berated him as a "dumb actor" who made chimp movies and the actor who never got the girl, he just looked the American people in the eye, gave them a dose of common sense and it was over. Carter went on to build low income houses and a life of obscurity punctuated by mischief.

The street fighting, world class, lifelong political experts of the left see "it" and it makes them crazy. They went crazy for Obama; they are going crazy for Palin, although in the other direction.

Palin could fill a stadium if she were reciting a cookbook. But she isn't. She is delivering common sense to an electorate that is becoming ever more jaded every day with the Obama nonsense. Miranda rights for terrorists? $4 trillion deficit?

Look at the blow she delivered with one phrase about "styrofoam columns" and imagine what she can do with the material Obama has recently given her.

Opposing Palin's values has no payoff for the left. They oppose those values for any conservative. They have to destroy her. And that is her power because they can't destroy her.

Whenever she chooses, she will take her first trip to Iowa to campaign for some obscure congressional candidate, and when she does, the liberal media cannot ignore the screaming crowds. And they will not be crowds manufactured by an advance team. They will be fired up mothers, working people who do not want to pay for deadbeats' mortgages, people who are now going to grass roots tea parties.

The television age gives "it," charisma, more power than ever before. Charisma is magnified through television. How else to explain how a 2 year senator few knew could derail Hillary in a few months. How else to explain how an anti-charisma John McCain, someone television does not flatter or magnify, saw his crowds surge when Palin was next to him. Palin, an obscure, unknown governor of our most distant and most unknown state, walked onto the national stage and ignited a burst of energy that may well have taken McCain over the top, until his Queeg-like pausing of his campaign to work on a financial crisis and then vote for a bailout.

The landscape is now quite different. There are tens of millions of people who never voted for Obama, telling their friends "don't blame me." There is a growing number who did vote for Obama who have lost their jobs at car dealerships, who have not found work yet even after the massive spending, and there are those who just say "...this is not the change I had in mind."

Some thought McCain would be the anti-charisma candidate against the charisma candidate and that would work. Now we may be lining up for the common sense charisma campaign against the nonsense charisma.

The left is telling us something and they are the experts. They are telling us not to make Palin the conservative candidate because if we do, it will be humiliating. I agree with them and I take them at their word.

It will be the undoing of Obama, and it may be overwhelming.

Jay Valentine blogs at jayvalentine.com.



Obama Erases Pro-Democracy Money for Iran

Is this more evidence as to whose side President Obama is on? - oyh

By: Kenneth R. Timmerman

http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/Obama_Democracy_Iran/2009/06/19/227155.html

Even as Ayatollah Khamenei blasted the United States for fomenting unrest in a defiant Friday prayer address in Tehran, President Obama has kept silent, focusing instead on domestic policy.

Obama spent more time with TV personality Stephen Colbert, taping a segment for a comedy show, than he did addressing the turmoil in Iran this week.

Newsmax has learned that the Obama administration also has zeroed out funding for pro-democracy programs inside Iran from the State Department budget for fiscal 2010, just as protests in Iran are ramping up.

Funding for pro-democracy programs began in 2004, when Congress earmarked $1.5 million of the State Department budget for “educational, humanitarian, and non-governmental organizations and individuals inside Iran to support the advancement of democracy and human rights in Iran.”

The funding ramped up dramatically two years later, when Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice requested $75 million for pro-democracy programs. More than half of the $66.1 million Congress finally appropriated went to expand U.S. government-funded Persian language broadcasting services at Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.

But no money has been earmarked for such programs in the administration’s fiscal 2010foreign operations budget request. Congressional sources told Newsmax they doubted that a Democrat-controlled Congress would add it when the budget comes before a committee next week.

Controversy has surrounded the programs from the start, with pro-regime lobbying groups, such as the National Iranian-American Council urging the State Department to cancel the funding.

And although Bush administration officials told pro-democracy activists they wanted to fund projects inside Iran (as called for in the original legislative language), State Department desk officers intervened to block funding for any projects other than cultural exchanges and “think tanks and studies,” insiders told Newsmax.

One key opponent of the funding, who weighed in at meetings to block specific grant requests aimed at helping pro-democracy groups inside Iran, was Suzanne Maloney, who is now at the Brookings Institution.

Speaking at a Washington forum that the National Iranian-American Council sponsored Wednesday, Maloney applauded President Obama’s do-nothing policy. “The best thing we can do for Iranian democracy is sit back and let Iranians fight it out for themselves,” she said, echoing the president’s own words from a brief press statement the day before.

Program supporters say the efforts of people such as Maloney inside the State Department to blunt the original intent have made the funding virtually meaningless.

“The State Department never did a lot with all the funding we gave them, so I’m not sure that zeroing it out is a huge loss,” an aide to a key congressional supporter of the funding told Newsmax.

"Of the total $67 million that was appropriated, $42.7 million has been obligated, and $20.8 disbursed,” according to a just-released report from the Congressional Research Service.

Kenneth Katzman, the analyst who wrote the research service's Iran report, told Newsmax that the programs “suffered from finding few participants” inside Iran who were willing to be seen as taking U.S. government money.

“These programs reached a limited number of people in Iran and that would indicate that their effectiveness was limited.”

When reporters asked White House spokesman Robert Gibbs on Thursday about the president’s “hands-off approach,” Gibbs said there was “no debate in the White House” over how to address the events in Iran.

“Everybody is on the same page. There’s no difference of opinion. I think the only thing I might take — the only thing I would take — some exception to is the notion that the president has been hands-off.”

The next question from the press was about Father’s Day.

Earlier, the White House and the State Department dismissed Iranian government claims that it was interfering in the election.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton reinforced the administration’s “hands-off” policy in a statement to reporters on Wednesday.

“It is for the Iranians to determine how they resolve this internal protest concerning the outcome of the recent election,” she said.

At the same time, Clinton defended the phone call by a 27-year old State Department staffer to the CEO of Twitter, urging him to delay scheduled maintenance work to ensure that the social networking service remained available for use by Iranians without interruption.



Third Inspector General Controversy Emerges

Is President Obama violating US law while consolidation a Socialistic government? - oyh

By: Dave Eberhart

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_IG_controversy/2009/06/19/227192.html?s=al&promo_code=81E7-1

Judith Gwynn, the Inspector General for the International Trade Commission, has been told that her contract will not be renewed, making her the third IG in the Obama administration to draw controversy, according to a report by ABC News.

Gwynn’s release appears to be linked to an incident she recorded in her April 2009 Semiannual Report to Congress where she complained that “in the course of conducting an investigation regarding contractor activities, certain procurement files were removed forcibly from the possession of the Inspector General by a Commission employee.”

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, sent the chair of the ITC a letter asking about the March 5 tug-of-war with the files, noting his chagrin that the Inspector General was treated in such a manner. Shortly thereafter Gwynn got notice that her tenure would end.

According to the ABC report, Grassley wrote to ITC Chair Shara L. Aranoff, noting: “The ability of Inspectors General to secure agency records subject to audit or investigation is essential to ensure the integrity and reliability of their work on behalf of Congress and the American People.”

According to a report in AllGov.com, Gwynn had been auditing ITC activities and contracting while on temporary status since January 2008, when she was appointed. Since then Gwynn had been employed in a succession of six-month contracts with her current contract set to lapse next month.

In addition to uncovering what was beneath the file controversy, Grassley wants to know why the ITC has been permitted to keep its IG on six-month contracts. “I am unaware of any other agency Inspector General that serves under such a constraint and am curious to learn what statutory authority gives the USITC the ability to make a limited term appointment,” Grassley wrote.

Unlike most IGs in the federal service, the ITC’s IG is classified as a “non-independent” office -- giving the commission’s watchdog less independence and flexibility to carry out investigations.

ABC noted that the Gwynn controversy differed from the other two IG flaps because of its apparent lack of connection to the Obama administration. The White House does not appoint the inspector general of the ITC – Aranoff has that authority. Aranoff was appointed to the position by President Bush.

Since the Obama administration took over, the president has fired the IG for the Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS), and there is a charge that IG investigations at the Library of Congress have been allegedly interfered with.

The Inspector General for CNCS, Gerald Walpin, 77, has denied the charge that he had grown fuzzy and disoriented, saying the White House was simply discriminating against someone who is older than most. “I’m not senile. I’m not disoriented. It’s an absolute lie,” he said.

There is one similarity between Gwynn and Walpin, however.

Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., the author of a law that requires 30-day notice of the firing of an IG to Congress, has opined that the law has been violated in both cases.



Couple Ordered to Stop Holding Bible Study at Home Without Permit

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,522637,00.html

Pastor David Jones and his wife Mary have been told that they cannot invite friends to their San Diego, Calif. home for a Bible study — unless they are willing to pay tens of thousands of dollars to San Diego County.

"On Good Friday we had an employee from San Diego County come to our house, and inform us that the Bible study that we were having was a religious assembly, and in violation of the code in the county." David Jones told FOX News.

"We told them this is not really a religious assembly — this is just a Bible study with friends. We have a meal, we pray, that was all," Jones said.

A few days later, the couple received a written warning that cited "unlawful use of land," ordering them to either "stop religious assembly or apply for a major use permit," the couple's attorney Dean Broyles told San Diego news station 10News.

But the major use permit could cost the Jones' thousands of dollars just to have a few friends over.

For David and Mary Jones, it's about more than a question of money.

"The government may not prohibit the free exercise of religion," Broyles told FOX News. "I believe that our Founding Fathers would roll over in their grave if they saw that here in the year 2009, a pastor and his wife are being told that they cannot hold a simple Bible study in their own home."

"The implications are great because it’s not only us that’s involved," Mary Jones said. "There are thousands and thousands of Bible studies that are held all across the country. What we’re interested in is setting a precedent here — before it goes any further — and that we have it settled for the future."

The couple is planning to dispute the county's order this week.

If San Diego County refuses to allow the pastor and his wife to continue gathering without acquiring a permit, they will consider a lawsuit in federal court.



GRANDMA'S HANDS

Grandma, some ninety plus years, at feebly on the patio bench. She didn't move, just sat with her head down staring at her hands.

When I sat down beside her she didn't acknowledge my presence and the longer I sat I wondered if she was OK.

Finally, not really wanting to disturb her but wanting to check on her at the same time, I asked her if she was OK. She raised her head and looked at me and smiled. 'Yes, I'm fine, thank you for asking,' she said in a clear voice strong.

'I didn't mean to disturb you, grandma, but you were just sitting here staring at your hands and I wanted to make sure you were OK,' I explained to her.

'Have you ever looked at your hands,' she asked... 'I mean really looked at your hands?'

I slowly opened my hands and stared down at them. I turned them over, palms up and then palms down. No, I guess I had never really looked at my hands as I tried to figure out the point she was making.

Grandma smiled and related this story:

'Stop and think for a moment about the hands you have, how they have served you well throughout your years. These hands, though wrinkled shriveled and weak have been the tools I have used all my life to reach out and grab and embrace life.

'They braced and caught my fall when as a toddler I crashed upon the floor.

They put food in my mouth and clothes on my back. As a child, my mother taught me to fold them in prayer. They tied my shoes and pulled on my boots. They held my husband and wiped my tears when he went off to war.

'They have been dirty, scraped and raw, swollen and bent. They were uneasy and clumsy when I tried to hold my newborn son. Decorated with my wedding band they showed the world that I was married and loved someone special.

They wrote my letters to him and trembled and shook when I buried my parents and spouse.

'They have held my children and grandchildren, consoled neighbors, and shook in fists of anger when I didn't understand.

They have covered my face, combed my hair, and washed and cleansed the rest of my body. They have been sticky and wet, bent and broken, dried and raw.

And to this day when not much of anything else of me works real well these hands hold me up, lay me down, and again continue to fold in prayer.

'These hands are the mark of where I've been and the ruggedness of life. But more importantly it will be these hands that God will reach out and take when he leads me home. And with my hands He will lift me to His side and there I will use these hands to touch the face of Christ.'

I will never look at my hands the same again. But I remember God reached out and took my grandma's hands and led her home.

When my hands are hurt or sore or when I stroke the face of my children and husband I think of grandma. I know she has been stroked and caressed and held by the hands of God.

I, too, want to touch the face of God and feel His hands upon my face.



Let's play 'Match the racist to the quote'

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/06/lets_play_match_the_racist_to.html

Ethel C. Fenig

Match the speaker to the quote.

A) Reverend Jeremiah Wright
B) James von Brunn
C) Carlos Bledsoe/Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad

1) "U.S. soldiers are killing innocent Muslim men and women. We believe that we have to strike back. We believe in eye for an eye. We don't believe in turning the other cheek," he said.

2) "Them Jews ain't going to let him talk to me...(snip) that the president did not for fear of offending Jews and Israel.

3) "The Holocaust is a lie. Obama was created by Jews. Obama does what his Jew owners tell him to do. Jews captured America's money. Jews control the mass media."

Bonus question: Which is one is a far right racist hater; which one is a far left racist hater?

Correct answers:

1-C

2-A

3-B

Bonus answer. They all are racist haters; left, right, up, down merge into one group of haters.



American capitalism gone with a whimper

The following article was taken from an opinion columnist of the Russian Newspaper - Pravda
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/107459-0//

It must be said, that like the breaking of a great dam, the American decent into Marxism is happening with breath taking speed, against the back drop of a passive, hapless sheeple, excuse me dear reader, I meant people.

True, the situation has been well prepared on and off for the past century, especially the past twenty years. The initial testing grounds was conducted upon our Holy Russia and a bloody test it was. But we Russians would not just roll over and give up our freedoms and our souls, no matter how much money Wall Street poured into the fists of the Marxists.

Those lessons were taken and used to properly prepare the American populace for the surrender of their freedoms and souls, to the whims of their elites and betters.

First, the population was dumbed down through a politicized and substandard education system based on pop culture, rather then the classics. Americans know more about their favorite TV dramas then the drama in DC that directly affects their lives. They care more for their "right" to choke down a McDonalds burger or a BurgerKing burger than for their constitutional rights. Then they turn around and lecture us about our rights and about our "democracy". Pride blind the foolish.

Then their faith in God was destroyed, until their churches, all tens of thousands of different "branches and denominations" were for the most part little more then Sunday circuses and their televangelists and top protestant mega preachers were more then happy to sell out their souls and flocks to be on the "winning" side of one pseudo Marxist politician or another. Their flocks may complain, but when explained that they would be on the "winning" side, their flocks were ever so quick to reject Christ in hopes for earthly power. Even our Holy Orthodox churches are scandalously liberalized in America.

The final collapse has come with the election of Barack Obama. His speed in the past three months has been truly impressive. His spending and money printing has been a record setting, not just in America's short history but in the world. If this keeps up for more then another year, and there is no sign that it will not, America at best will resemble the Wiemar Republic and at worst Zimbabwe.

These past two weeks have been the most breath taking of all. First came the announcement of a planned redesign of the American Byzantine tax system, by the very thieves who used it to bankroll their thefts, loses and swindles of hundreds of billions of dollars. These make our Russian oligarchs look little more then ordinary street thugs, in comparison. Yes, the Americans have beat our own thieves in the shear volumes. Should we congratulate them?

These men, of course, are not an elected panel but made up of appointees picked from the very financial oligarchs and their henchmen who are now gorging themselves on trillions of American dollars, in one bailout after another. They are also usurping the rights, duties and powers of the American congress (parliament). Again, congress has put up little more then a whimper to their masters.

Then came Barack Obama's command that GM's (General Motor) president step down from leadership of his company. That is correct, dear reader, in the land of "pure" free markets, the American president now has the power, the self given power, to fire CEOs and we can assume other employees of private companies, at will. Come hither, go dither, the centurion commands his minions.

So it should be no surprise, that the American president has followed this up with a "bold" move of declaring that he and another group of unelected, chosen stooges will now redesign the entire automotive industry and will even be the guarantee of automobile policies. I am sure that if given the chance, they would happily try and redesign it for the whole of the world, too. Prime Minister Putin, less then two months ago, warned Obama and UK's Blair, not to follow the path to Marxism, it only leads to disaster. Apparently, even though we suffered 70 years of this Western sponsored horror show, we know nothing, as foolish, drunken Russians, so let our "wise" Anglo-Saxon fools find out the folly of their own pride.

Again, the American public has taken this with barely a whimper...but a "freeman" whimper.

So, should it be any surprise to discover that the Democratically controlled Congress of America is working on passing a new regulation that would give the American Treasury department the power to set "fair" maximum salaries, evaluate performance and control how private companies give out pay raises and bonuses? Senator Barney Franks, a social pervert basking in his homosexuality (of course, amongst the modern, enlightened American societal norm, as well as that of the general West, homosexuality is not only not a looked down upon life choice, but is often praised as a virtue) and his Marxist enlightenment, has led this effort. He stresses that this only affects companies that receive government monies, but it is retroactive and taken to a logical extreme, this would include any company or industry that has ever received a tax break or incentive.

The Russian owners of American companies and industries should look thoughtfully at this and the option of closing their facilities down and fleeing the land of the Red as fast as possible. In other words, divest while there is still value left.

The proud American will go down into his slavery with out a fight, beating his chest and proclaiming to the world, how free he really is. The world will only snicker.

Stanislav Mishin
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/107459-0/



The Year 1909

The year is 1909. One hundred years ago. What a difference a century makes! Here are some statistics for the Year 1909 :

1. The average life expectancy was 47 years.

2. Only 14 percent of the homes had a bathtub.

3. Only 8 percent of the homes had a telephone.

4. There were only 8,000 cars and only 144 miles of paved roads.

5. The maximum speed limit in most cities was 10 mph.

6. The tallest structure in the world was the Eiffel Tower!

7. The average wage in 1908 was 22 cents per hour.

8. The average worker made between $200 and $400 per year

9. A competent accountant could expect to earn $2000 per year, a dentist $2,500
per year, a veterinarian between $1,500 and $4,000 per year, and a mechanical
engineer about $5,000 per year.

10. More than 95 percent of all births took place at HOME .

11. Ninety percent of all doctors had NO COLLEGE EDUCATION!

12. Instead, they attended so-called medical schools, many of which were condemned in the press AND the government as ’substandard. ‘

13. Sugar cost four cents a pound.

14. Eggs were fourteen cents a dozen.

15. Coffee was fifteen cents a pound.

16. Most women only washed their hair once a month, and used Borax or egg yolks for shampoo.

17. Canada passed a law that prohibited poor people from entering into their country for any reason.

18. The American flag had 45 stars.

19. The population of Las Vegas, Nevada, was only 30!!!!

20. Crossword puzzles, canned beer, and ice tea hadn’t been invented yet.

21. There was no Mother’s Day or Father’s Day.

22. Two out of every 10 adults couldn’t read or write. Only 6 percent of all Americans had graduated from high school.

23. Marijuana, heroin, and morphine were all available over the counter at the local corner drugstores. Back then pharmacists said, ‘Heroin clears the complexion, gives buoyancy to the mind,regulates the stomach and bowels, and is, in fact, a perfect guardian of health’

24. Eighteen percent of households had at least one full-time servant or domestic help.

25. There were about 230 reported murders in the ENTIRE ! U.S.A. !

Five leading causes of death were:
1. Pneumonia and influenza
2. Tuberculosis
3. Diarrhea
4. Heart disease
5. Stroke



"The e-mail Bag"

The True Story of Four Horse

A man asked an American Indian what was his wife's name.

He replied, "She called Four Horse".

The man said, "That's an unusual name for your wife. What does it mean?"

The Old Indian answered, "It old Indian Name. It mean, NAG, NAG, NAG, NAG!"



Intelligence Inheritance

A little boy went up to his father and asked: 'Dad, where did my intelligence come from?' The father replied. 'Well, son, you must have got it from your mother, cause I still have mine.'

No comments: