Motivational-Inspirational-Historical-Educational-Political-Enjoyable
"Daily Motivations"
Our greatest natural resource is the minds of our children. -- Walt Disney
"Daily Devotions" (KJV and/or NLT)
The Voice of the Lord The voice of the Lord is upon the waters: the God of glory thundereth (Psalm 29:3). Some people think it’s a waste of time to simply sit at God’s feet and listen.
"The joy of the LORD is your strength." (Nehemiah 8:10)
"The Patriot Post"
"It is the duty of every man to render to the Creator such homage and such only as he believes to be acceptable to him. This duty is precedent, both in order of time and in degree of obligation, to the claims of Civil Society." -- James Madison, Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments, 1785
"Would it not be better to simplify the system of taxation rather than to spread it over such a variety of subjects and pass through so many new hands." -- Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, 1784
Democracy substitutes election by the incompetent many for appointment by the corrupt few. -- George Bernard Shaw, Man and Superman, "Maxims: Education," 1905
The government, which was designed for the people, has got into the hands of the bosses and their employers, the special interests. An invisible empire has been set up above the forms of democracy. -- Woodrow Wilson
"The Web"
Did you know?
As you walk up the steps to the building which houses the U.S. Supreme Court you can see near the top of the building a row of the world's law givers and each one is facing one in the middle who is facing forward with a full frontal view ... it is Moses and he is holding the Ten Commandments!
Did you know?
As you enter the Supreme Court courtroom, the two huge oak doors have the Ten Commandments engraved on each lower portion of each door.
Did you know?
As you sit inside the courtroom, you can see the wall, right above where the Supreme Court judges sit, a display of thea display of the Ten Commandments! Ten Commandments!
Did you know?
There are Bible verses etched in stone all over the Federal Buildings and Monuments in Washington, D.C.
Did you know?
James Madison, the fourth president, known as "The Father of Our Constitution" made the following statement:
"We have staked the whole of all our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God."
Did you know?
Patrick Henry, that patriot and Founding Father of our country said:
"It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded not by religionists but by Christians, not on religions but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ".
Did you know?
Every session of Congress begins with a prayer by a paid preacher, whose salary has been paid by the taxpayer since 1777.
Did you know?
Fifty-two of the 55 founders of the Constitution were members of the established orthodox churches in the colonies.
Did you know?
Thomas Jefferson worried that the Courts would overstep their authority and instead of interpreting the law would begin making law . an oligarchy . the rule of few over many.
Did you know?
The very first Supreme Court Justice, John Jay, said:
"Americans should select and prefer Christians as their rulers."
How, then, have we gotten to the point that everything we have done for 220 years in this country is now suddenly wrong and unconstitutional?
Lets put it around the world and let the world see and remember what this great country was built on.
Chamber, US House of Representatives
I was asked to send this on if I agreed or delete if I didn't. Now it is your turn ...
It is said that 86% of Americans believe in God. Therefore, it is very hard to understand why there is such a mess about having the Ten Commandments on display or "In God We Trust" on our money and having God in the Pledge of Allegiance. Why don't we just tell the other 14% to Sit Down and SHUT UP!!!
Why Did The Unions Today Choose 7 Million Illegal Aliens Over 7 Million Unemployed Americans?
By Roy Beck, Tuesday, April 14, 2009, 11:16 PM
WASHINGTON AND JEFFERSON COLLEGE, Pa. -- Just finished a 9-person immigration debate here after doing a live interview on the Glenn Beck Show from a studio in downtown Pittsburgh (if you wondered what the Iron City skyline was doing behind me during my appearance).
I'm on to Colorado tomorrow for a Thursday morning debate appearance at Denver University.
Started today on a CNN segment about the effect of illegal immigration on unemployment for less-educated American workers.
And throughout the day, did phone interviews with newspaper reporters through each airport as everybody is wondering . . .
. . . why in the world would the nation's union leaders take a stand to keep 7 million unemployed Americans from getting a job.
Thanks to a new study out from the Pew Hispanic Center today, we now have a solid citation for there being more than 8 million illegal foreign workers currently holding U.S. jobs!
Using the largest estimate of illegal workers in agriculture jobs, that means more than 7 million illegal aliens are holding down jobs in the construction, manufacturing and service industries.
Those are the jobs being sought (yes, this is the same number) by more than 7 million unemployed American workers who have no more than a high school education.
Why would the unions turn their backs on unemployed American workers?
Because backing illegal foreign workers -- and foreign workers in general -- is where the money is. Even for unions.
The Ford Foundation -- the prime backer of higher immigration, more foreign workers and rewards for illegal immigration for 40 years -- has announced that it is pouring $30 MILLION into immigration efforts the next 18 months.
And that is just one of dozens of foundations who are pulling out all the stops to pass an amnesty this year.
The announcement today by the national union leaders is part of this coordinated effort.
What is the business of unions?
Union dues.
The mission of American unions may have been to improve the working situation for American workers but the BUSINESS is union dues.
About the only kind of growth in the union business for a long time has been in unionizing foreign workers. The unions made especially strong in-roads among illegal workers. Thanks to a loophole in the 1986 law that made it illegal to hire an illegal alien, it is perfectly legal for a union to provide membership to an illegal alien. But the unions are hopeful that they will be able to get union dues out of a lot more of the 8 million illegal aliens if an amnesty can be secured for them.
If you are a member of a union (and I have been at points in my life), you need to raise a ruckus with your local leaders. They will be scared to death to report your concerns to the top, but you should insist on it.
To be fair to the national union leaders, there is some non-cynical rationale behind their switch from a century-long practice of protecting American workers from too much immigration. In 1986, the unions were promised that the feds would stop businesses from hiring illegal workers and, thus, depressing wages for all workers. But the Bush and then the Clinton and then the Bush Administrations failed miserably to stop the hiring. As the number of illegal workers grew into the millions, the unions leaders came to believe that the feds were never going to stop the flow. Thus, if all those foreign workers were going to be occupying jobs, anyway, the union leaders figured they might as well be legal so they would do less harm to wages and working conditions.
I understand that, and I have some sympathy for it.
But the answer is for the unions to throw every bit of their influence behind passing a mandatory E-Verify bill which would begin to drive illegal foreign workers out of the labor market. Instead, the unions have been fighting E-Verify.
I have a feeling that the pro-amnesty position that began to be considered by the unions early this decade started out as a somewhat logical response to the lack of federal enforcement.
But this year's union opposition to E-Verify makes me believe that today's pro-amnesty announcement is a sign that the national labor movement has become hostile to American workers. It appears the national labor leaders are far more interested in helping for foreign workers than in helping American workers.
The legacy of Samuel Gompers was shattered today.
National Media Dismiss, Disparage and Attack Tax Day Tea Parties
Three networks and CNN ignore populist storm until tax day; blast FOX and repeat left-wing claims of 'AstroTurf' in same-day coverage. MSNBC continues vulgar 'teabagging' jokes. - Read the entire article by following the "link" below.
By Julia A. Seymour
Business & Media Institute
4/16/2009 1:09:12 PM
http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2009/20090416130347.aspx
Silent no more, by tax day the networks, CNN and the major papers finally acknowledged the story of the Tax Day Tea Party protests. And while they covered them, they found many ways to discredit the movement by repeating the claims of the left.
In CNN’s case, the network also became the story when one of its reporters showed contempt for people at the Chicago Tea Party, calling the protests “anti-government” and “anti-CNN.” One night earlier, Anderson Cooper repeated the offensive sexual term “teabagging,” which had been the favorite anti-tea party slur of “liberal” MSNBC since April 9.
National broadcast or print media used the term “AstroTurf” at least 12 times since April 10 to attack the idea that the protests were a grassroots movement of conservatives. Left-wing bloggers at BuzzFlash used that term to label the tea party movement as early as March 24.
A number of reports also accused Fox News of being too involved in the protests. ABC’s Dan Harris repeated criticism from the left that the tea parties were “a product” of Fox News and lobbyist organizations. All three network newscasts tried to discredit the protests on April 15.
All of those themes – “Teabagging” remarks, “AstroTurf” slams and claims that Fox News was organizing the protest – were popularized on left-wing blogs and MSNBC before resounding in the mainstream media’s echo chamber.
URGENT HOT PETITION! Please click, sign, and WE WILL FAX your petition automatically to ALL 100 U.S. SENATORS right away (saving you hours of labor)!
https://secure.conservativedonations.com/pijn_fax/?a=2272
Dear Citizen Activists,
President Barack Obama continues to push his nomination of federal Judge David Hamilton, who has issued controversial rulings (banning public prayers offered "in Jesus name," and hastening the abortion of unborn children), to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals (the same court that has reversed his aggressive decisions for many years).
To oppose Hamilton, we've already put in 240,000+ fax petitions to the U.S. Senate, but to the delight of many liberal groups (including the National Abortion Rights Action League who is actively campaiging FOR Hamilton), ZERO REPUBLICAN SENATORS have yet promised to filibuster this bad nomination of the most dangerous liberal extremist, anti-Life, anti-Liberty, anti-Jesus Judge David Hamilton to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. We must demand a filibuster to oppose him. Can you please help us reach our goal of 1,000,000 faxes against Hamilton?
PLEASE CLICK HERE TO SIGN AND WE'LL AUTOMATICALLY FAX YOUR PERSONALIZED PETITION TO ALL 100 U.S. SENATORS, OPPOSING THE ANTI-LIFE, ANTI-CHRISTIAN JUDGE DAVID HAMILTON.
Judge Hamilton is the worst of Obama's 15 new liberal appeals court appointees. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals covers Wisconsin, Indiana and Illinois. Since most cases never reach the Supreme Court, the federal appellate circuits often provide the last word on cases affecting life and liberty.
READ THE FACTS:
The Judicial Confirmation Network quickly opposed Hamilton's nomination, stating that "President Obama's first nominee to the federal appeals courts -- specifically the appeals court based in Chicago -- is an ultra-liberal named David Hamilton who is a former fundraiser for ACORN and former leader of the Indiana chapter of the ACLU. He was nominated to the district court bench by President Clinton even though he had no judicial experience and was rated as 'not qualified' by the American Bar Association ."
Hamilton ruled in 2005 to ban the practice of opening the chamber's business with prayers mentioning Jesus Christ or using terms such as "Savior." He said that amounted to state endorsement of a religion. (But he ruled prayers to "Allah" were perfectly lawful.)
ANTI-JESUS, BUT PRO-ALLAH?
Judge Hamilton wrote: "The injunction orders the Speaker...that the prayers should not use Christ's name or title or any other denominational appeal...If those offering prayers in the Indiana House of Representatives choose to use the Arabic 'Allah'...the court sees little risk that the choice of language would advance a particular religion or disparage others.
In other words, Judge Hamilton ruled the words "Jesus" or "Christ" are illegal words, prohibited for public speech, banned by the First Amendment, which somehow prohibits freedom of religious expression, and makes Christian prayers ILLEGAL in a public forum. (What crazy version of the First Amendment is he reading?)
Thank God, we took action in 2007 and provided legal arguments to the Indiana Attorney General who appealed to the 7th Circuit Court and WE WON a 2-1 decision overruling Hamilton, restoring the right to pray "in Jesus name" in Indiana.
PLEASE CLICK HERE TO SIGN AND WE'LL AUTOMATICALLY FAX YOUR PERSONALIZED PETITION TO ALL 100 U.S. SENATORS, OPPOSING THE ANTI-LIFE, ANTI-CHRISTIAN JUDGE DAVID HAMILTON.
ANTI-LIFE BUT PRO-ABORTION?
In 2003, Judge Hamilton struck down part of an Indiana law on abortion. The reasonable law had required abortion clinics to simply give women information about alternatives to abortion in the presence of a physician or nurse, 18 hours before the procedure, until Hamilton ruled to hasten abortions . But thank God, the 7th Circuit Court also reversed Hamilton's bad decision in that case.
If confirmed now Hamilton will sit on that 7th Circuit Court (the same court that frequently overruled him) with terrible power to rule the heartland with his anti-life, anti-liberty, anti-Christian agenda.
WE CAN WIN THIS BATTLE!
We've already sent thousands of faxes to the full Senate, and we're getting results! On April 1st, Senator Orrin Hatch led all Republicans to walk out of the Senate Judiciary Committee, in protest against the Democrat "rush job" to confirm Judge Hamilton. Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, said he was troubled by Hamilton's ruling against a sectarian prayer to open the Indiana House of Representatives. Even Senator Arlen Specter expressed concern. But will they vote unanimously against Hamilton?
Unfortunately retiring RINO Senator Richard Lugar (R-IN) endorsed Hamilton, endangering his own state of Indiana and ruining his own legacy. Lugar's five phone numbers are: Indianapolis (317) 226-5555, Evansville (812) 465-6313, Fort Wayne (260) 422-1505, Valparaiso (219) 548-8035, DC Office (202) 224-4814. Everybody please call all five numbers today, and especially ask your Indiana friends to call Sen. Lugar . You might even call both U.S. Senators from your own state, at 202-225-3121.
But remember, 100 emails = 10 phonecalls = 1 fax in political capital, since the Senate staffers must handle each paper and usually write a reply. So please join our automated fax-petition campaign first. Then please forward this email to your Indiana-Illinois-Wisconsin friends, and to all pastors in all 50 states, and click here to download a church flyer that pastors can copy and distribute.
But first, take action right now! I pray you will not hesitate, but sign the petition and WE WILL FAX your petition right away, automatically to all 100 U.S. Senators.
PLEASE CLICK HERE TO SIGN AND WE'LL AUTOMATICALLY FAX YOUR PERSONALIZED PETITION TO ALL 100 U.S. SENATORS, OPPOSING THE ANTI-LIFE, ANTI-CHRISTIAN JUDGE DAVID HAMILTON.
God Bless you, in Jesus' name,
Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt
"The e-mail Bag"
Never underestimate a Redneck
A Redneck from North Carolina walked into a bank in New York City and asked for the loan officer.
He told the loan officer that he was going to Bakersfield on business for two weeks and needed to borrow $5,000 and that he was not a depositor of the bank.
The bank officer told him that the bank would need some form of security for the loan, so the Redneck handed over the keys to a new Ferrari.
The car was parked on the street in front of the bank. The Redneck produced the title. Everything checked out.
The loan officer agreed to hold the car as collateral for the loan and apologized for having to charge 12% interest.
Later, the bank's president and its officers all enjoyed a good laugh at the Redneck from the south for using a $250,000 Ferrari as collateral for a $5,000 loan.
An employee of the bank then drove the Ferrari into the bank's private underground garage and parked it.
Two weeks later, the Redneck returned, repaid the $5,000 and the interest of $23.07.
The loan officer said, 'Sir, we are very happy to have had your business, and this transaction has worked out very nicely, but we are a little puzzled. While you were away, we checked you out and found that you are a multimillionaire. What puzzles us is, why would you bother to borrow $5,000?'
The good 'ole Tar Heel boy replied, 'Where else in New York City can I park my car for two weeks for only $23.07 and expect it to be there when I return?'
His name was BUBBA...
A SATISFIED TAXPAYER
Dear Internal Revenue Service:
On this April 15th tax return due date you will find enclosed my 2008 tax return showing that I owe $3,407.00 in taxes.
Please note the attached article from the USA Today newspaper, dated 12 November, wherein you will see the Pentagon (Department of Defense) is paying $171.50 per hammer and NASA has paid $600.00 per toilet seat.
I am enclosing four (4) toilet seats (valued @ $2,400) and six (6) hammers (valued @ $1,029), which I secured at Home Depot, bringing my total remittance to $3,429.00. Please apply the overpayment of $22.00 to the "Presidential Election Fund," as noted on my return.
You can do this inexpensively by sending them one (1) 1.5 inch Phillips Head screw (see aforementioned article from USA Today newspaper detailing how H.U.D. pays $22.00 each for 1.5 inch Phillips Head Screws). One screw is enclosed for your convenience.
To recap my enclosures:
Four toilet seats, Six hammers, and One screw.
It has been a pleasure to pay my tax bill this year, and I look forward to paying it again next year.
Sincerely,
A Satisfied Taxpayer
1 comment:
ENFORCE THE 1986 IMMIGRATION & REFORM ACT? IT'S ALREADY AVAILABLE & ON THE BOOKS? NO MORE AMNESTIES!
You will never get a true accounting from our government, politicians or the national press, on what illegal aliens are costing US taxpayers? It spirals into hundreds of billions of dollars. Nor will we ever know the costs to taxpayers associated with the Stimulus spending packages. Same with illegal immigration, owing to fact that one must hunt down financial appropriation through the back door, by going to the Internet. Let's face it--as far as our legislators are concerned--it's not our business? Americans have been lethargic on a need--to--know basis? If we didn't have the web, we THE PEOPLE would never know the expenditures of our respected politicians, hidden away on Capitol hill? In the old days the only way to express, frustration, followed by anguish and then finally anger was by mail or a screened phone call. It's only today that with computer technology can we not only complain to our Senators and Representatives, but network with thousands of other individuals, who realize they have been manipulated by the personages on the Hill?
The Immigration Reform and Control Act , also Simpson-Mazzoli Act (IRCA) signed by President Ronald Reagan on November 6, 1986) is an Act of Congresswhich reformed United States immigration law. The Act made it illegal to knowingly employ or recruit illegal immigrants (immigrants who have not been processed and not possess lawful work authorization), It required the business world to attest to their employees' immigration status, and granted amnesty to certain illegal immigrants, who had settled here continuously and who entered the United States before January 1, 1982. The law also granted a path towards legal status to certain immigrants and agricultural seasonal workers who had been continuously and illegally present in the United States since January 1, 1982. It proposed the I-9 form to ensure that all employees presented documentary proof of their legal eligibility to accept employment in the United States, which could be easily forged. If at all it was used by unscrupulous companies, who have two sets of tax books anyway?It was estimated that over 2.7- 3 million individuals were given a path to legal status from the 1983 IRCA law. https://www.oig.lsc.gov/legis/irca86.htm If our politicians are truly working for the American people--THEN WHY NOT ADD AMENDMENTS TO THE (IRCA)?
In this last decade secret committees and behind closed doors on issues, are soon revealed by either parties clerks, contacts or staff members. Within an instant the staff member has already emailed a friend, who has transmitted alarm to a significant adverse organization to that policy. Immigration reform as a paramount issue, is fomenting quietly on the back burner and will soon raise it's ugly head again. It makes absolutely know sense to initiate another immigration reform package, when each day the media expresses concern of the rising jobless population. Mexico is the largest culprit to relieve the overheating pressure of their abundance of people looking for work. The problem is, we cannot and should not bring into our country more slave labor, when even our own professional people have downgraded to a bar tender--just to put food on the table. hundreds of thousands of American kids cannot find a job, because foreign nationals have displaced them in Mc Donalds, or other fast food establishments. I hear the continuing discourse of lost souls, conveying that who would mow the lawn, wash dishes in restaurant, make beds in hotels. Well guess who were exposed to these tasks back in the 50 and 60's? Actual Americans completed these jobs, even down to picking potatoes and other vegetables and fruit in the bygone days. My grandfather told me how he picked strawberries, grapes and even potatoes after the second World War and was able to feed his family.
President Obama is going to introduce a new Immigration reform bill to the Congress this very year--is probable? But Americans today are ready and although a new law might pass--their will be many compromises. If a new reform bill is enacted, millions of more uneducated, indigent will will expect the same--if they can just make it across the border? The only way to stop this second invasion, is to make unlawful entry a criminal act and a felony. With a severe prison sentence attached, that will make people think twice. As a good example read Mexican immigration law, if you slip into there nation. It isn't pretty and it can be extremely dangerous.
Build the fence as originally planned by Rep. Duncan Hunter.(R-CA). See how the barrier stretches through San Diego--it's not a single fence as constructed as separating the US from Mexico. It was envisioned as a double layer barrier, with razor wire along its length and a gravel two lane vehicle no-mans land in between. The completely funded barrier along the Southern border stopped a large percentage of drugs and illegal people crossing. Yet the extension that was secretly unfunded by President Bush is a single fence with areas of complete openness with only motion detectors, vehicle barriers and high towers with many non-functioning cameras. Even the actual length as of this year, is subject to miscalculation? You will have to investigate for yourself on AMERICANPATROL the truth? They used their own plane to survey the building of the fence You can thank Sen. Harry Reid and his contingent of Democrats for sacrificing funding, so they the border fence has been less of a deterrent.
Our new President has promised this path to citizenship for millions. But what about the criminals who have penetrated the hinterland with illicit drugs. What of all those spending years in incarceration. The murders, rapists, kidnappers, home invasion robberies, are they going to get citizenship in the future? How in the world can any government agency organize the removal of hard-core gang members, who have infiltrated every community in our nation. Even now they have huge backlogs of honest potential immigrants waiting in their home countries for an entry visa. Perhaps one of the most disgusting indignity is the rise in drunk driving by foreign nationals. It seems to re vibrate across the country, in every small neighborhood to the towns and cities. Very seldom will the liberal, self-opinionated press release this information to the public. many of these drivers have several or even more DUI's and have been released over and over again. There always seems to be a measure of leniency in front of a traffic judge, but not for Americans. This finally comes to a halt, when the drunken driver of the vehicle who cannot read traffic signs plows down and runs, or kills a family on the highway. In the bigger cities the roads the roads have become a dangerous obstacle course for regular people, and end up fighting their insurance company because the other driver has no insurance or even a valid drivers license.
Those who apply under the new bill have several obstacles, to being recognized by the American people as new immigrants. They must pay some or all back taxes? That will be real interesting, when even our own politicians have cheated the IRS for not paying what's due to Uncle Sam? Then paying a fine as a penalty for entering this country without being processed? Cannot imagine how much they will be expected to pay. Some immigration attorneys charge around $2500 for filing and processing your application for residency? Will they only have to pay--may be $2.000 dollars, when honest immigrants paid that--and more? Seems very unfair to me--extremely unfair, to those who have waited in line for years? Then they must learn English and understand some US history and government.
The US Homeland Security are going to have their hands full. It will be very interesting to learn how the FBI goes about checking police backgrounds of the millions of family members who have settled here. That in itself, will take an act of Congress to appropriate the money for investigations and record searching from one foreign nation to the other. Remembering many countries do not have police records available--so then what does the agency do. hundreds of criminals make get amnesty and our police departments will never know.
Last but not least. Every newcomer have to submit to a medical examination. Or so that was the case. We only have to read the tepid press in mostly hardly disclosed print of breakout of Tuberculosis, or some other contagious diseases. Most of these are in public schools in large populations of illegal immigrants, such as California. But many illnesses spread very quickly amongst the inhabitants of small rural towns, where the news is stifled--so as not to cause a panic.
Nobody can blame just one administration---Not the Obama administration, George Bush, Bill Clinton, George Bush Senior all the way to Ronald Reagan. None have enforced the 1986 (IRCA) Immigration law. We had a chance to enforce the Simpson/Mazzoli laws but was--as usual--upstaged by the special interest confederacy. The new H.R. laws was miserable enforced and subjected to massive fraud by a majority who could counterfeit utility bills or other documents, proving they had been here for many years. The 1986 Immigration and Control act has decomposed before our eyes and now we have 13 million or up to 40 million illegal aliens (according to the the Heritage Foundation)--whoever you are inclined to believe. this is not just border jumpers, but countless numbers who flew here and overstayed their visas. Stupid as it sound the US Customs and Immigration form you fill-in, before arriving in this country, never had the capacity to be aware who has left--when their tourist or other visa expires. Nobody ever checked and it was a fallacy to think anybody could be tracked down--once here with a INS document.
Immigration laws have always been engineered by our legislators, which made sure that anybody who crossed the border was not subjected to criminal law. The war gods of the business world had used their influence and healthy bank accounts to sink any federal statutes that would hinder their greed. So now we have people running around with either copies of a legal family members social security number, or counterfeit drivers licenses, green cards or some other form of identification. If caught they used to be only detained if they committed a felony or the (INS) Immigration and Naturalization Service would let them walk the streets again. If in the first place the law had been more rigid, such in Mexico or hundreds of other countries around the world--this nonsense would never have happened.
For all the leniency applied to the people who unlawfully came here, is the demand for even more. All we get in many cases is demonstrations expecting citizen rights with foreign flag waving and a unceasing amount of criminal activity nationwide. Many do come here to work and some pay taxes, but not enough to cover the extraordinary costs applied to free medical care, education, housing and a whole host of undisclosed government handouts. Through a large loophole in IRS tax regulation Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). An obscene amount of money is returned to low income workers, states financial analyst and economist Edwin Rubinstein in his book. Originally a report, The Earned Income Tax Credit and Illegal Immigration: A Study in Fraud, Abuse, and Liberal Activism. For instance, the Additional Child Tax Credit (ACTC) is available to illegal immigrants even if they do not have a valid Social Security number. The EITC is the most accessible of the major entitlement programs and used by more people than food stamps or Medicare. In 2007, more than 23 million households received more than $47 billion in the EITC payments. Much of the so-called "tax relief" goes to people who never paid a cent in taxes. Pariah employers should be paying for all these services, but instead are extracted from taxpayers exhausted wallets and purses. It's equally absurd and disgraceful when Americans needing social help and denied under current laws.
Before of any immigration reform the US population was promised that the gates of our country would be sealed shut. That the illegal movement of people in large numbers would be terminated. But nothing of the sort has been done and yet we are supposed to welcome countless millions out of the shadows? Critics say that it will be a bountiful opportunity to build our economy? Well! I don't think so--nor millions of other people, who comment in thousands of newspapers around the country. If they do pay taxes at all, most will receive the majority back as they have large families. That if you are on the poverty line, you will not pay any taxes anyway. It's really simple mathematics that many of those here, will have access to our many government handouts
Yet the worst is yet to come. Once settled as a bone-fide legal resident, they can then sponsor their family circle. Sen. Obama voted in favor of the Clinton Amendment (SA 1183) to S. 1348. The Clinton Amendment would significantly increase legal immigration by adding an unlimited number of spouses and minor children of lawful permanent residents to the uncapped immediate relative category that currently is for the spouses, minor children and parents of U.S. citizens only. As a Senator has a terrible history of staunching illegal immigration. He has always to vote for guest worker amnesties, chain migration, comprehensive immigration reform, including voted against capping special work visas, voted against an amendment to stop guest workers being issued green cards and in 2008 voted for a policy to safeguard Sanctuary cities. What it really means is that President Obama is anti-American sovereignty and pro-illegal immigrant. Go to NUMBERSUSA for the grading facts of Obama's immigration record.
With either party in power THE LINE IN THE SAND HAS BEEN DRAWN, but even in a worst way with the Democrats. I see it as a ugly battle, because ordinary citizens will be blasted with nasty racial slurs. Many will not show up or cringe down away from the libertarian epithets, including all responsible lawmakers who try to make a stand. Tom Tancredo was divorced from speaking out at the University of North Carolina and many others have been ethically assassinated by a mob of who do not believe in the right to "Free Speech".
Two issues must be carefully calculated in this war. First and foremost this is an issue about the massive costs involved, in not only for every man, women and in some cases children being processed. But the years ahead will be a very expensive one for the taxpayers, for the millions who will be able legally to forage around for free benefits. First of all Social Security will take a hit, because these people will be unemployed in a grand scale. Not just the Mothers of babies questionably born in the United States in a 14th Amendment misinterpreted law meant for slaves after the War of the States, that gave them immediate ad-factor citizenship. That a baby intentionally brought into our sovereign nation, so that the Mother can become a welfare recipient and collect government benefits. Thus assuring because of this misinterpretation of our laws, an illegal immigrant mother can apply for food stamps, Medicare , low income housing and welfare payments. That the husband and other children without legal status can reside in the home. Yet our old folks, veterans and sick can remain homeless, and should morally get first preference.
"The average illegal immigrant family receives an average of $30,000 in governmental benefits! Yet they pay only about $9,000 in taxes per year. That creates a $21,000 shortfall that the American taxpayer has to make up. That's like buying each of the illegal immigrant families a brand new Mustang convertible -- each and every year!" so states Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation
Now the Obama administration is opening a can of worms by pushing for another AMNESTY. If the 1986 Immigration and Control Act had been rigidly enforced, instead of being intentionally ignored or just downright dropped, we would not be in this organized chaos caused by the K street lobbyists? Now the the Democratic hierarchy is running rampant, looking to appease minorities---we can expect the worst? With disgraceful legislators like Sen. Harry Reid, Speaker Nancy Pelosi that snuffed E-Verify, ostracized the real ID act, the regular police detainment 247(g) program. Anything that contradicts their open border agenda, it's dead mostly in the Senate chambers. There is to much information to unfold in commenting, so go to these sites: VDARE, FAIRUS, JUDICIALWATCH, NUMBERSUSA, AMERICANPATROL, CAPSWEB & ALIPAC. The stakes are sky high because Amnesty means, thousands more will swamp the border looking for yet a 3rd---AMNESTY.
Post a Comment