ConservativeChristianRepublican-Report - 20090212

Motivational-Educational-Historical-Inspirational-Enjoyable



"Daily Motivations"

Promises are like crying babies in a theater, they should be carried out at once. -- Norman Vincent Peale

The nose of the bulldog is slanted backwards so he can continue to breathe without letting go. -- Winston Churchill

Every thought is a seed. If you plant crab apples, don’t count on harvesting golden delicious. -- Bill Meyer



"The Patriot Post"

US Economy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEfICUoWKBw - Sen. Schumer, I believe Americans do care. - oyh

Schumer: “The American People Don’t Care About The Pork In The Spending Bill”

"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on the objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." -- James Madison

"Our nation is facing a serious economic crisis, but the Democrats in Congress have offered a purely partisan bill that does not incorporate bipartisan recommendations. The American people deserve to know that the president's call for a compromise has been completely ignored by House Democrats who would use a time of national economic crisis to fund their big government priorities under the guise of stimulating the economy. .... The Democrat bill won't stimulate anything but more government and more debt." --Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN)

The Golden State is in such desperate need of gold that residents will have to wait to receive their own money back this year. ABC News reports that "tax refunds are now on hold in California for the first time in state history, according to the state controller's office." California has had no money in the general fund for 17 months and has been borrowing from Wall Street and special interest funds. Even that borrowed money will be gone by the end of February. The state controller's office has called for a 30-day delay in tax refunds beginning 1 February because it needs the extra $1.99 billion to pay for "education, debt service, and other payments that legally have first claim to state funds." Now, color us confused, but if tax refunds are due to individuals, are they really part of "state funds"?

“There's a reason why the Obama administration wanted to cram this massive spending bill through the Congress by Abe Lincoln's birthday. Speed is of the essence: The longer it lingers, the more details emerge, proving this egg is rotten to the core. Republicans are now using those details to build skepticism about this freight train of partisan pork.” -- Brent Bozell, III, Author, Syndicated Columnist, Founder and President, Media Research Center



2nd. Amendment

"A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." -- Second Amendment, United States Constitution

"No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms." --Thomas Jefferson



"It ought to be a law that people must have a gun in their homes. I know many fine police officers. But we can't depend on the police to protect us anymore. The value of human life means nothing to [criminals]. If it had been my house [this thug] came in on, he would have wound up at Coulter Funeral Home." -- General Sessions Court Judge Bob Moon (Chattanooga, TN) advising a female victim of a home invasion to buy a gun


"What is a left-wing socialist but a Marxist without a gun"? -- Don Feder



Faith and Family: 'Stimulating' family planning

One of Barak Obama's first actions as president was to lift the ban on U.S. funding of abortions in other countries. The policy banned the use of federal dollars to overseas organizations providing abortions, providing information on them, or lobbying to make them legal. Obama said that the ban "undermines family planning in developing countries." Since when is abortion considered family "planning"?



"The Web"

Wash Your Hands Very Often! Keep Your Hands Clean!

http://media2.foxnews.com/112008/worm_tumor_700.wmv



Tags: Economy

http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/articles/americans-oppose-nationalizations-of-banks-021109001.html

From Rasmussen (conducted: 2/8-9/09)

Overall, 75% Oppose Nationalization of banks
88% of Republicans oppose
62% of Democrats oppose

Commentary by Kris Lazaro (registered Democrat)

As banks continue to struggle in these tough economic times, the question of nationalization of such entities comes up. Should the federal government take over these ailing banks in the hopes of salvaging their losses?

This is a tough question, but one that needs to be answered. To this author, the answer is no. This country is still technically a free market economy and if our banks start to become nationalized, then what sector is next?

This is not a fear of socialism, but the avoidance of loss of economic freedom. The federal government should only take over a bank in dire circumstances, and in such cases it should only be temporary.

We all need to remember the principles of a free market, and not panic at the first signs of trouble, for one day it will again fix itself.



Jesus, Rescue Me!

http://www.andiesisle.com/JesusRescueMe.hs.html



Every man's work shall be made manifest... -- 1 Corinthians iii. 13.



STROKE: Remember the 1st Three Letters…. S.T.R.

STROKE IDENTIFICATION:

During a BBQ, a friend stumbled and took a little fall - she assured everyone that she was fine (they offered to call paramedics) .she said she had just tripped over a brick because of her new shoes.

They got her cleaned up and got her a new plate of food. While she appeared a bit shaken up, Ingrid went about enjoying herself the rest of the evening

Ingrid’s husband called later telling everyone that his wife had been taken to the hospital - (at 6:00 pm Ingrid passed away.) She had suffered a stroke at the BBQ. Had they known how to identify the signs of a stroke, perhaps Ingrid would be with us today. Some don’t die. they end up in a helpless, hopeless condition instead.

It only takes a minute to read this…

A neurologist says that if he can get to a stroke victim within 3 hours he can totally reverse the effects of a stroke… totally . He said the trick was getting a stroke recognized, diagnosed, and then getting the patient medically cared for within 3 hours, which is tough.

RECOGNIZING A STROKE

Thank God for the sense to remember the ‘3′ steps, STR . Read and Learn!

Sometimes symptoms of a stroke are difficult to identify. Unfortunately, the lack of awareness spells disaster. The stroke victim may suffer severe brain damage when people nearby fail to recognize the symptoms of a stroke.

Now doctors say a bystander can recognize a stroke by asking three simple questions:

S * Ask the individual to SMILE.
T * Ask the person to TALK and SPEAK A SIMPLE SENTENCE (Coherently) (i.e. It is sunny out today)
R * Ask him or her to RAISE BOTH ARMS.

If he or she has trouble with ANY ONE of these tasks, call emergency number immediately and describe the symptoms to the dispatcher.

New Sign of a Stroke ——– Stick out Your Tongue

NOTE: Another ’sign’ of a stroke is this: Ask the person to ’stick’ out his tongue.. If the tongue is ‘crooked’, if it goes to one side or the other, that is also an indication of a stroke.

SHARE THE LINK : http://shettydeepak.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/blood-clotsstroke/ WITH AS MANY PEOPLE YOU KNOW, YOU CAN BET THAT ATLEAST ONE LIFE WILL BE SAVED.



The End of Parenting: The Complete Morons Who Take Their Kids to "Friday the 13th"

By Debbie Schlussel

Tonight, I concluded that the decline of America is increasing with rapidity and escalation far worse than I've earlier diagnosed.

I just returned from a special critics and promotional screening of the latest installment of the "Friday The 13th" movie franchise. This latest one bears the same name as the 1980 original--simply, "Friday the 13th." And I watched parents voluntarily subject their very young children to graphic, bloody violence, from which many parents in the Third World only wish they could shield their kids.

Al-Qaeda murdered 3,000 Americans on 9/11. That was an outrage. But thousands more American parents--who are merely sperm, egg, and womb donors--are doing to this country what Al-Qaeda could never do. These American parents have voluntarily turned their kids' minds to mush--kids who will still be around, who will "grow up," and who will continue to add to America's decline.

Does This Look Like It's for Babies & 10-Year-Olds?

In the past, I've complained on this site about selfish parents who take their babies to the movies, so we hear them crying instead of the movie. And I've lamented that irresponsible parents take their very young kids to violent, graphic, sex-laden, R-rated movies like this one. This latest "Friday the 13th," should have been rated NC-17 and, a few years ago, it would have been. But Hollywood is desperate to keep teens coming to these flicks and manages to get the ratings standards relaxed.

But while I blame Hollywood, I blame these pseudo-parents far more.

Tonight, I saw ever more extreme examples of this--of the morons who are "raising" America's next generation.

"Friday The 13th" is what you'd expect--except that it's more graphic, bloody, and violent than ever. Posters and passes to the free screening of this movie say, "FROM THE PRODUCERS OF THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE." (There are more graphic beheadings in this movie than a dozen Al-Qaeda videos.) It also is more replete with topless, heavily-implanted women, sexual language and content, and a prolonged, very explicit sex scene.

It's NOT for kids. But fewer and fewer parents in America seem to care anymore.

Tonight, I saw--or rather, heard--at least two crying babies at the "Friday the 13th" showing. And I saw at least two parents with VERY young, impressionable kids. It was one of those times I wish I had a video camera with me. I spoke with each of these parents I saw.

First, the babies. I understand that it's "Friday The 13th." It's no masterpiece. More like the anti-masterpiece. I expected lots of laughter at supposedly scary points in the movie and lots of talking back to the screen.

But I didn't expect surround-sound baby. Two single parents--a baby mama and a baby daddy--brought their babies to the movie. They didn't think: Hmmm . . . I don't wanna or can't afford to spring for a baby sitter. So, the right thing to do would be to be a good parent and a good citizen and stay home with my kid.

Nope, they thought: I wanna see a free movie, and damn it if I have this inconvenient product of my slutty single sex life get in the way. I'm gonna go see that movie, not matter what. And I don't give a crap if the rest of the people in the theater can't enjoy the movie when my baby predictably cries or makes noises.

That was selfish enough. But, then, as you'd predict, their babies repeatedly cried, cooed, and screamed during the entire movie. Not once did they get up and leave the theater. No, that would ruin their movie-viewing experience. Who gives a crap about the rest of the people in the theater?

I asked both of the parents of these babies why they brought their crying babies to the movies. Both happened to be Black, but don't you worry that this is a race thing, because I'll get to the two moronic single White mothers who brought their young kids later on in this column.

First, there was a single Black mother with her baby. I shouted to her, "Why did you bring a baby to "Friday the 13th?" "Shut up, bitch," was the response. To another film critic's questions, she and her friends said, "Mind ya own damn bid'ness." Um, well, we would, if we wouldn't have to hear the result of your bid'ness throughout the movie, sister.

Then, there was the single Black father and his aging mother with a baby. I'd bet money his mother is raising this grandkid. They were parked next to me, and after the movie, I asked, "Why was it necessary for you to bring your baby to 'Friday the 13th'? Don't you think that's rude and irresponsible?"

His response: "He say he wanna get scared."

Me: "Huh? How old is this kid? Can he even talk?"

Baby Daddy: "He one-year-old."

Me: "A one-year-old can understand what's going on in 'Friday the 13th'? Come on . . .. ."

Baby Daddy: "You'd be surprised."

Me, getting into my car: "Well, that's very irresponsible parenting and very rude to the rest of us who heard his crying."

Then, there are the two White, single mothers with their kids, who looked to be between the ages of 8 and 11.

White Single Mother #1 took two young daughters to see this disgustingly violent, explicitly sexual movie. I asked her youngest daughter how old she was. She looked at me and her mother like even she knew she wasn't old enough to be there.

White Single Mother (WSM) #1: "She's eleven."

Me: "Why would you take an eleven-year-old girl to see this movie?"

WSM #1: "Well, if I would have known it would be like this . . .. .."

Me: "If you would have known?! Lady, it's 'Friday the 13th.'"

And it's R-rated. WSM #1 threw her hands up and smiled because she knew quite well what the content of "Friday the 13th." It's not like there haven't been a gazillion sequels to and incarnations of this movie over the last three decades (the first was in 1980).

Me: "Great parenting. You're a moron."

White Single Mother #2 had a teeny, tiny, young boy with her. I asked the boy how old he is. He, too, had the same look of guilt as White Single Mother #1's daughter. He knew he shouldn't be at this movie.

White Single Mother (WSM) #2: "He's ten."

Me: "Why are you taking a ten-year-old to see such a graphic violent movie?"

WSM #2: "It's only a movie. And, yeah, I know it's violent and stuff, but he knows right from wrong. And ya know, it's only a movie and stuff."

Me: "Huh? That's Bullsh-t. He's only ten and you're taking him to a movie where people are hacked to death, burned alive, and otherwise killed in morbid, grisly ways?"

WSM #2: "I can't believe you just cussed in front of my son."

Me: "Why does that suddenly bother you, since you just dragged your ten-year-old son to a movie at eleven o-clock at night, in which they're swearing throughout the entire movie? [Every other word is sh-t, f-ck, the p-word, etc.] You're completely irresponsible."

WSM #2: "Well, that's not real. Mind your own business."

You know what? I wish Americans could mind their own business. I wish that we didn't have so many morons, so many irresponsible people raising kids in America. But that is my business, and it's yours, too. Because how they raise--or rather, don't raise--their kids is going to affect us and future generations of this country. "Deep Throat" is "just a movie," too. I wonder why this woman isn't also showing that to her 10-year-old. Or maybe she is.

Trust me--this isn't the first time White Single Mothers #1 and #2 are subjecting their kids to these kinds of movies, violence, and sex, because they, themselves, can't pass up a free movie ticket. If they have no problem with this, odds are that they have no problem with a lot of other objectionable things that come up in raising their kids. And the same goes for Black Single Mom and Father. They'll do the same. These so-called parents have no sense, no basic standard of what it means to be responsible, to raise your child with the tools to be good people and use common sense. It's, frankly, indecent. And sickeningly selfish.

And this is one of the reasons I'm not optimistic about America's future.

When I was a kid, my parents investigated the movies I saw BEFORE I saw them. They didn't let me see the movies I was too young to see. They didn't view parenting as a passive, go-through-the-motions avocation. It was their very serious vocation. (And they taught me to be a polite citizen--not to consider a movie theater my own personal living room, in which I can answer my cell phone, bring a crying baby, provide John Madden-style endless play-by-play color commentary of the obvious regarding what's happening on-screen, or otherwise disturb everyone else repeatedly.)

At first, my father wouldn't let me see "Star Wars," because he heard there were monsters and scary-looking people in it. I was seven or eight at the time and begged him to see it. He saw it on his own first to check it out and loved it, realizing that his concerns were not borne out. He couldn't wait to take us. But I'm glad--and lucky--that I had a parent who cared enough to be concerned in the first place.

When I was in high school, my dad wouldn't let me see "Risky Business" because it glorified prostitution and pimping (as a way to get into the college of your choice). But compared to the new "Friday the 13th," "Risky Business" is nothing.

Sorry, but parents who take their ten-year-olds to see "Friday the 13th" shouldn't have kids. It's child abuse of a more insidious kind.

These were just four irresponsible parents--all single parents, too. But I've seen other parents take their young kids to violent, risque movies. And there are, sadly, tens of thousands--probably hundreds of thousands and even millions--of American parents who just don't give a damn.

They don't give a damn about the rest of the people in the theater. And, even worse, they don't care a whit about their own children.

And when people don't care enough about their own kids, who will they care about?

Certainly not the rest of their country. The stuff to which you subject your children is the stuff that they will be.

Garbage in, garbage out. And sadly, we have a lot of trash to take out in America.

Let's take out the trash before it takes us out.



"Chuck Sproull"

FOUR SIDES OF SPIRITUAL WARFARE:

Chuck Sproull, Springville IN

This principle applies to all moral, religious and political issues. There is enmity between all 4 sides: A's love to defend God's standard from C's and D's abuses, but sometimes B's are a hindrance. All could become winners if they would wave the white flag of surrender to Jesus and allow God's standards of righteousness to govern them.

For Example: To justify their abnormal alternatives, homosexual and lesbian activists love to point out and exaggerate (1) negative examples of normal marriages that were abusive and unfaithful (mostly caused by the Human Rights Campaign exposing generations of married men and women and youth, to pornography and violence in entertainment, media and public
schools, made worse by alcohol and drug addictions), and (2) violence caused by a few bigots who speak the truth in hate; as if there is something wrong with normal marriage and with the preaching the truth of God's word in love. Then they try to point out positive advantages of their selfish perversions.

A. Good examples of something good:

(1) God established normal marriage between a man and a woman as His standard, for moms and dads to raise normal boys and girls. But there are some allowable variations:

(2) Some choose to put their children up for adoption.

(3) Some couples can't have children, some adopt.

(4) Some choose not to have children. (Do any of these - 2,3,4 - justify alternative sexual relationships or redefinition of marriage? NO!!!)

B. Bad examples of something good:

(5) Some normal partners are abusive and unfaithful, cause marriage to end in divorce, and force children to be raised in foster

homes or adopted. Does this mean normal marriage is bad? No. Only that some people failed to demonstrate the goodness

of normal marriage.


C. Good examples of something bad:
(6) A few gay partners may seem to care more for each other than abusive normal people, and have longer lasting relationships.
(7) Some desire to adopt and raise children who were victims of divorced normal marriages.
(8) Some have made positive contributions to society, but not as a result of them being homosexual.
(9) Some are hated by normal people (B's).
D. Bad examples of something bad:
(10) Recent psychological studies have shown that the seemingly good examples (6,7,8,9) are just pretty masks for the ugly evil lurking in the darkness of selfishness, dishonesty, homoerotic perversion, sadism, brutal abusiveness, child molestation, pederasty, diseases and early deaths.

- (6) Caring and sharing household expenses does not justify immoral sexual relationships. Two normal men or two women can live

together, and care for each other's well being, and qualify for household tax breaks, without engaging in same sex-unions.

Most homosexual relationships are very abusive, temporary, multiple.
- (7) Children raised by two males (homos) or two females (lesbians) are more frequently abused, have a higher incidence of drug and alcohol abuse and suicide (looking for false comfort from sexual and emotional abuse), are very confused, have bad impressions of gender, and are embarrassed by the negative social stigma of their situation.

- (8) Their good contributions are not because of their homosexuality, but because of other good personal abilities. Many people attempt to justify their immorality by their positive contributions, without acknowledging their greater negative damage to
society, or how much more positive their contribution could be if they were normal. God wants us to keep our good qualities and turn away from all evil, and for our hearts and lives to be filled with His good influence of His word.

- (9) As American citizens, our Bill of Rights guarantees all citizens including homosexuals, legal protection from hatred, prejudice and violence. But they are not protected from enforcement of laws against all forms of immorality, or from the preaching of God's word in love that can save them. Also, our innocent children are guaranteed protection from physical, emotional and sexual abuse. No matter how much homosexuals may want to be included in "diversity" and "multiculturalism," and be protected from prejudice, two males or two females involved in intimate sex with each other are not "diversity," they are "perversity."

(11) Homosexual activists try to recruit school children into this perversion through "sex education." (Planned Parenthood also uses this tactic to sell unreliable birth control products, and then abortions.) When some students resist or their parents react negatively, homosexual activists attempt to further coerce them by accusing them of "homophobia" or of being afraid. But this is flawed reasoning (Rom 2:1-3).

Many people bathe every day, not because they are afraid of dirt "dirt-phobic," but because they hate the diseases and annoyances associated with filth, and love the benefits of cleanliness. Likewise, normal people don't avoid homosexuality because of fear or prejudice, but because they hate the physical and moral corruptions associated with it, and don't want it taught in the schools or shown in movies; and because of their conscience they love the benefits associated with higher standards of morality. Homosexuals don't seem to understand this. Besides, if "homophobia" helps people be avoid the health and emotional problems and the eternal
consequences associated with those perverted sexual relationships, then it is a good thing. Our Creator, who became our Savior (in Jesus Christ), will someday be Judge of all who refuse to receive deliverance. "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of Wisdom" (Psalm 111:10, also Deut 6:2, Psalm 33:8, Psalm 103:7 and Prov. 1:28-30).

Do any of these examples (2-11) justify redefining marriage, or legalizing so-called "gay marriage" or any other "civil union" that includes sex outside of normal marriage? ABSOLUTELY NO!!!

The obvious conclusion is this; if people want to enjoy the sexual relations that God created within us, and to raise children as God ordained, let them be saved and cleansed from their vile erotic lusts and engage in normal marriage (A). In spiritual warfare there is only one winning team -faithful husbands and wives, and dads and moms who teach their boys and girls to be normal men and women. All other non-standard sexual relationships are inferior substitutes for God's original plan, and in the long run, all are losers. There is no physical or spiritual future in homosexual relations.



"The email Bag"

As I came out of the supermarket that sunny day...

Submitted by Andy, Gettysburg, Pa.

... pushing my cart of groceries towards my car, I saw an old man with the hood of his car up and a lady sitting inside the car, with the door open.

The old man was looking at the engine. I put my groceries away in my car and continued to watch the old gentleman from about twenty five feet away.

I saw a young man in his early twenties with a grocery bag in his arm, walking towards the old man. The old gentleman saw him coming too and took a few steps towards him. I saw the old gentleman point to his open hood and say something.

The young man put his grocery bag into what looked like a brand new Cadillac Escalade and then turn back to the old man and I heard him yell at the old gentleman saying, "You shouldn't even be allowed to drive a car at your age." And then with a wave of his hand, he got in his car and peeled rubber out of the parking lot.

I saw the old gentleman pull out his handkerchief and mop his brow as he went back to his car and again looked at the engine. He then went to his wife and spoke with her and appeared to tell her it would be okay.

I had seen enough and I approached the old man. He saw me coming and stood straight and as I got near him I said, "Looks like you're having a problem."

He smiled sheepishly and quietly nodded his head. I looked under the hood myself and knew that whatever the problem was, it was beyond me.

Looking around I saw a gas station up the road and told the old man that I would be right back. I drove to the station and went inside and saw three attendants working on cars. I approached one of them and related the problem the old man had with his car and offered to pay them if they could follow me back down and help him.

The old man had pushed the heavy car under the shade of a tree and appeared to be comforting his wife. When he saw us he straightened up and thanked me for my help. As the mechanics diagnosed the problem (overheated engine) I spoke with the old gentleman.

When I shook hands with him earlier he had noticed my Marine Corps ring and had commented about it, telling me that he had been a Marine too. I nodded and asked the usual question, "What outfit did you serve with?"

He had mentioned that he served with the first Marine Division at Tarawa, Saipan, Iwo Jima and Guadalcanal. He had hit all the big ones and retired from the Corps after the war was over.

As we talked we heard the car engine come on and saw the mechanics lower the hood. They came over to us as the old man reached for his wallet, but was stopped by me and I told him I would just put the bill on my AAA card.

He still reached for the wallet and handed me a card that I assumed had his name and address on it and I stuck it in my pocket. We all shook hands all around again and I said my goodbye's to his wife.

I then told the two mechanics that I would follow them back up to the station. Once at the station I told them that they had interrupted their own jobs to come along with me and help the old man. I said I wanted to pay for the help, but they refused to charge me.

One of them pulled out a card from his pocket looking exactly like the card the old man had given to me. Both of the men told me then, that they were Marine Corps Reserves. Once again we shook hands all around and as I was leaving, one of them told me I should look at the card the old man had given to me. I said I would and drove off.

For some reason I had gone about two blocks when I pulled over and took the card out of my pocket and looked at it for a long, long, time. The name of the old gentleman was on the card in golden leaf and under his name........"Congressional Medal of Honor Society."

I sat there motionless looking at the card and reading it over and over. I looked up from the card and smiled to no one but myself and marveled that on this day, four Marines had all come together, because one of us needed help. He was an old man all right, but it felt good to have stood next to greatness and courage and an honor to have been in his presence.

America is not at war. The U.S. Military is at war-- America is at the Mall.